<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sophie Masson on Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/04/sophie-masson-on-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/04/sophie-masson-on-blogging/</link>
	<description>Life, Culture and Politics from BrisVegas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:06:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Farrell</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/04/sophie-masson-on-blogging/#comment-20253</link>
		<dc:creator>James Farrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/04/sophie-masson-on-blogging/#comment-20253</guid>
		<description>Mary&#039;s opening comment goes for me as well. I am violating Brian&#039;s Rule #2 perhaps, but Mark is in effect conducting a survey, so he might want to know not just the range of attitudes, but also their frequency.

While on the subject of Brian&#039;s rules, I also concur strongly with #1. But I&#039;m also pretty busy and don&#039;t want to read through too much facetious general chit-chat, especially if the participants are an &#039;in&#039; crowd, focused mainly on themselves.

Comments threads give me intellectual stimulus from vigorous debate among thoughtful people (which I don&#039;t get at work), and delight in the occasional well-crafted gem of a comment. For me, it&#039;s not a substitute for the pub. I don&#039;t even go to the pub. (And I wonder if Rob&#039;s pub is real or ideal.) That&#039;s what I thought chat rooms were for.  &lt;i&gt;TA&lt;/i&gt; has a facetious chit-chat quotient of about 25%, &lt;i&gt;JQ&lt;/i&gt; about 10%, so they suit me pretty well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary&#8217;s opening comment goes for me as well. I am violating Brian&#8217;s Rule #2 perhaps, but Mark is in effect conducting a survey, so he might want to know not just the range of attitudes, but also their frequency.</p>
<p>While on the subject of Brian&#8217;s rules, I also concur strongly with #1. But I&#8217;m also pretty busy and don&#8217;t want to read through too much facetious general chit-chat, especially if the participants are an &#8216;in&#8217; crowd, focused mainly on themselves.</p>
<p>Comments threads give me intellectual stimulus from vigorous debate among thoughtful people (which I don&#8217;t get at work), and delight in the occasional well-crafted gem of a comment. For me, it&#8217;s not a substitute for the pub. I don&#8217;t even go to the pub. (And I wonder if Rob&#8217;s pub is real or ideal.) That&#8217;s what I thought chat rooms were for.  <i>TA</i> has a facetious chit-chat quotient of about 25%, <i>JQ</i> about 10%, so they suit me pretty well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Farrell</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/04/sophie-masson-on-blogging/#comment-45055</link>
		<dc:creator>James Farrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/04/sophie-masson-on-blogging/#comment-45055</guid>
		<description>Mary&#039;s opening comment goes for me as well. I am violating Brian&#039;s Rule #2 perhaps, but Mark is in effect conducting a survey, so he might want to know not just the range of attitudes, but also their frequency.

While on the subject of Brian&#039;s rules, I also concur strongly with #1. But I&#039;m also pretty busy and don&#039;t want to read through too much facetious general chit-chat, especially if the participants are an &#039;in&#039; crowd, focused mainly on themselves.

Comments threads give me intellectual stimulus from vigorous debate among thoughtful people (which I don&#039;t get at work), and delight in the occasional well-crafted gem of a comment. For me, it&#039;s not a substitute for the pub. I don&#039;t even go to the pub. (And I wonder if Rob&#039;s pub is real or ideal.) That&#039;s what I thought chat rooms were for.  &lt;i&gt;TA&lt;/i&gt; has a facetious chit-chat quotient of about 25%, &lt;i&gt;JQ&lt;/i&gt; about 10%, so they suit me pretty well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary&#8217;s opening comment goes for me as well. I am violating Brian&#8217;s Rule #2 perhaps, but Mark is in effect conducting a survey, so he might want to know not just the range of attitudes, but also their frequency.</p>
<p>While on the subject of Brian&#8217;s rules, I also concur strongly with #1. But I&#8217;m also pretty busy and don&#8217;t want to read through too much facetious general chit-chat, especially if the participants are an &#8216;in&#8217; crowd, focused mainly on themselves.</p>
<p>Comments threads give me intellectual stimulus from vigorous debate among thoughtful people (which I don&#8217;t get at work), and delight in the occasional well-crafted gem of a comment. For me, it&#8217;s not a substitute for the pub. I don&#8217;t even go to the pub. (And I wonder if Rob&#8217;s pub is real or ideal.) That&#8217;s what I thought chat rooms were for.  <i>TA</i> has a facetious chit-chat quotient of about 25%, <i>JQ</i> about 10%, so they suit me pretty well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harry</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/04/sophie-masson-on-blogging/#comment-20252</link>
		<dc:creator>harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/04/sophie-masson-on-blogging/#comment-20252</guid>
		<description>The biggest anticlimax of... well a short while.

The deleted comment read:

&quot;Haven&#039;t read the article yet, but anybody got a cake?&quot;

Tadaa!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest anticlimax of&#8230; well a short while.</p>
<p>The deleted comment read:</p>
<p>&#8220;Haven&#8217;t read the article yet, but anybody got a cake?&#8221;</p>
<p>Tadaa!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harry</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/04/sophie-masson-on-blogging/#comment-45054</link>
		<dc:creator>harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/04/sophie-masson-on-blogging/#comment-45054</guid>
		<description>The biggest anticlimax of... well a short while.

The deleted comment read:

&quot;Haven&#039;t read the article yet, but anybody got a cake?&quot;

Tadaa!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest anticlimax of&#8230; well a short while.</p>
<p>The deleted comment read:</p>
<p>&#8220;Haven&#8217;t read the article yet, but anybody got a cake?&#8221;</p>
<p>Tadaa!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/04/sophie-masson-on-blogging/#comment-20251</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/04/sophie-masson-on-blogging/#comment-20251</guid>
		<description>Too bad if everyone else preferred it the other way.  Should have got in first, you losers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad if everyone else preferred it the other way.  Should have got in first, you losers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/04/sophie-masson-on-blogging/#comment-45053</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/04/sophie-masson-on-blogging/#comment-45053</guid>
		<description>Too bad if everyone else preferred it the other way.  Should have got in first, you losers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad if everyone else preferred it the other way.  Should have got in first, you losers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/04/sophie-masson-on-blogging/#comment-20250</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/04/sophie-masson-on-blogging/#comment-20250</guid>
		<description>Done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/04/sophie-masson-on-blogging/#comment-45052</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/04/sophie-masson-on-blogging/#comment-45052</guid>
		<description>Done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/04/sophie-masson-on-blogging/#comment-20249</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/04/sophie-masson-on-blogging/#comment-20249</guid>
		<description>Hadn&#039;t noticed myself, Rob, but I agree &quot;Simon says&quot; is much better! Over to you, Robert!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hadn&#8217;t noticed myself, Rob, but I agree &#8220;Simon says&#8221; is much better! Over to you, Robert!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/04/sophie-masson-on-blogging/#comment-45051</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/04/sophie-masson-on-blogging/#comment-45051</guid>
		<description>Hadn&#039;t noticed myself, Rob, but I agree &quot;Simon says&quot; is much better! Over to you, Robert!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hadn&#8217;t noticed myself, Rob, but I agree &#8220;Simon says&#8221; is much better! Over to you, Robert!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

