Comments on: Who Won the Cold War? http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/08/who-won-the-cold-war/ Life, Culture and Politics from BrisVegas Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:12:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Nabakov http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/08/who-won-the-cold-war/#comment-20823 Nabakov Sun, 17 Apr 2005 11:47:29 +0000 http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/08/who-won-the-cold-war/#comment-20823 Uhm. Having revisted my earlier post here, I should point out it was late and I was pissed. Having said that, I think there's a big point to made here about the discountinutity between what they them there said back then and what's going on now. I'm actually lunching with Laurie Lessig and other players in about a fortnight (Deakin Innovations Lecture shit). Will report back then on current US state of the art thinking about wrangling the global attention economy. (This comment written while listening to Jodie Foster sing "La Vie C'est Chouette". Got your attention didn't I?) Uhm. Having revisted my earlier post here, I should point out it was late and I was pissed. Having said that, I think there’s a big point to made here about the discountinutity between what they them there said back then and what’s going on now.

I’m actually lunching with Laurie Lessig and other players in about a fortnight (Deakin Innovations Lecture shit). Will report back then on current US state of the art thinking about wrangling the global attention economy.

(This comment written while listening to Jodie Foster sing “La Vie C’est Chouette”. Got your attention didn’t I?)

]]> By: Nabakov http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/08/who-won-the-cold-war/#comment-45625 Nabakov Sun, 17 Apr 2005 11:47:29 +0000 http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/08/who-won-the-cold-war/#comment-45625 Uhm. Having revisted my earlier post here, I should point out it was late and I was pissed. Having said that, I think there's a big point to made here about the discountinutity between what they them there said back then and what's going on now. I'm actually lunching with Laurie Lessig and other players in about a fortnight (Deakin Innovations Lecture shit). Will report back then on current US state of the art thinking about wrangling the global attention economy. (This comment written while listening to Jodie Foster sing "La Vie C'est Chouette". Got your attention didn't I?) Uhm. Having revisted my earlier post here, I should point out it was late and I was pissed. Having said that, I think there’s a big point to made here about the discountinutity between what they them there said back then and what’s going on now.

I’m actually lunching with Laurie Lessig and other players in about a fortnight (Deakin Innovations Lecture shit). Will report back then on current US state of the art thinking about wrangling the global attention economy.

(This comment written while listening to Jodie Foster sing “La Vie C’est Chouette”. Got your attention didn’t I?)

]]> By: Mark http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/08/who-won-the-cold-war/#comment-20822 Mark Sun, 17 Apr 2005 11:25:08 +0000 http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/08/who-won-the-cold-war/#comment-20822 Cats are the secret rulers of the world, Irant... Cats are the secret rulers of the world, Irant…

]]> By: Mark http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/08/who-won-the-cold-war/#comment-45624 Mark Sun, 17 Apr 2005 11:25:08 +0000 http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/08/who-won-the-cold-war/#comment-45624 Cats are the secret rulers of the world, Irant... Cats are the secret rulers of the world, Irant…

]]> By: Irant http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/08/who-won-the-cold-war/#comment-20821 Irant Sat, 16 Apr 2005 08:44:28 +0000 http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/08/who-won-the-cold-war/#comment-20821 Yeah, I'm not sure what Nabs was doing relating Feyerabend/Kuhn to IP. These people with cat gravatars...I dunno. It worries me. Yeah, I’m not sure what Nabs was doing relating Feyerabend/Kuhn to IP. These people with cat gravatars…I dunno. It worries me.

]]> By: Irant http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/08/who-won-the-cold-war/#comment-45623 Irant Sat, 16 Apr 2005 08:44:28 +0000 http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/08/who-won-the-cold-war/#comment-45623 Yeah, I'm not sure what Nabs was doing relating Feyerabend/Kuhn to IP. These people with cat gravatars...I dunno. It worries me. Yeah, I’m not sure what Nabs was doing relating Feyerabend/Kuhn to IP. These people with cat gravatars…I dunno. It worries me.

]]> By: Mark http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/08/who-won-the-cold-war/#comment-20820 Mark Sat, 16 Apr 2005 06:15:50 +0000 http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/08/who-won-the-cold-war/#comment-20820 Thanks, Irant. I'm not sure Nabs needs to be opposed to the Kuhns and Feyerabands - since they were doing philosophy of science. I don't see how their arguments are inconsistent with a focus on IP. But then I'm not sure what "perception is the lever" means in this context. Thanks, Irant.

I’m not sure Nabs needs to be opposed to the Kuhns and Feyerabands – since they were doing philosophy of science. I don’t see how their arguments are inconsistent with a focus on IP. But then I’m not sure what “perception is the lever” means in this context.

]]> By: Mark http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/08/who-won-the-cold-war/#comment-45622 Mark Sat, 16 Apr 2005 06:15:50 +0000 http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/08/who-won-the-cold-war/#comment-45622 Thanks, Irant. I'm not sure Nabs needs to be opposed to the Kuhns and Feyerabands - since they were doing philosophy of science. I don't see how their arguments are inconsistent with a focus on IP. But then I'm not sure what "perception is the lever" means in this context. Thanks, Irant.

I’m not sure Nabs needs to be opposed to the Kuhns and Feyerabands – since they were doing philosophy of science. I don’t see how their arguments are inconsistent with a focus on IP. But then I’m not sure what “perception is the lever” means in this context.

]]> By: Irant http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/08/who-won-the-cold-war/#comment-20819 Irant Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:36:13 +0000 http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/08/who-won-the-cold-war/#comment-20819 Well Nabs hasn't come back from lunch yet so for Mark, Feyerabend's main arguments is the infamous "anything goes" in regards to scientific methodology. Some consider it epistemological anarchy but that it to misread Feyerabend. He wasn't saying that there is no progress in science (though he was vague regarding what "progress" meant)nor you can't "do" science but that the act of science doesn't adhere to a universal scientific method. Kuhn is mentioned at the end and they do share similar ideals however Feyerabend takes them a tad further. Well Nabs hasn’t come back from lunch yet so for Mark, Feyerabend’s main arguments is the infamous “anything goes” in regards to scientific methodology. Some consider it epistemological anarchy but that it to misread Feyerabend. He wasn’t saying that there is no progress in science (though he was vague regarding what “progress” meant)nor you can’t “do” science but that the act of science doesn’t adhere to a universal scientific method.

Kuhn is mentioned at the end and they do share similar ideals however Feyerabend takes them a tad further.

]]> By: Irant http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/08/who-won-the-cold-war/#comment-45621 Irant Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:36:13 +0000 http://larvatusprodeo.net/2005/04/08/who-won-the-cold-war/#comment-45621 Well Nabs hasn't come back from lunch yet so for Mark, Feyerabend's main arguments is the infamous "anything goes" in regards to scientific methodology. Some consider it epistemological anarchy but that it to misread Feyerabend. He wasn't saying that there is no progress in science (though he was vague regarding what "progress" meant)nor you can't "do" science but that the act of science doesn't adhere to a universal scientific method. Kuhn is mentioned at the end and they do share similar ideals however Feyerabend takes them a tad further. Well Nabs hasn’t come back from lunch yet so for Mark, Feyerabend’s main arguments is the infamous “anything goes” in regards to scientific methodology. Some consider it epistemological anarchy but that it to misread Feyerabend. He wasn’t saying that there is no progress in science (though he was vague regarding what “progress” meant)nor you can’t “do” science but that the act of science doesn’t adhere to a universal scientific method.

Kuhn is mentioned at the end and they do share similar ideals however Feyerabend takes them a tad further.

]]>