Archive for June, 2005

America’s image problem

This report on the abuse of American students in today’s Sunday Mail is a manifestation of a greater worldwide problem regarding America’s image in the world.

The recently (23/06/05) released Pew Global Attitudes Project on the way the world sees America highlights the depths to which their reservoir of goodwill has sunk.

Anti-Americanism in Europe, the Middle East and Asia, which surged as a result of the U.S. war in Iraq, shows modest signs of abating. But the United States remains broadly disliked in most countries surveyed, and the opinion of the American people is not as positive as it once was. The magnitude of America’s image problem is such that even popular U.S. policies have done little to repair it. President George W. Bush’s calls for greater democracy in the Middle East and U.S. aid for tsunami victims in Asia have been well-received in many countries, but only in Indonesia, India and Russia has there been significant improvement in overall opinions of the U.S.

Unfortunately Australia was not one of the countries surveyed, but I suspect that despite the Sunday Mail report, our views would be more positive than many of the countries surveyed. What say ye on this Sunday morn?

Can’t see the Wood for the trees

The Douglas Wood story gets more curious, with revelations being detailed just about every day. It’ll be interesting to hear his story this evening, though given that he was bound, gagged, and blindfolded most of the time I can’t figure out what he would add to the events leading up to his release. Either way, with his loquacious nature there could be some good stuff on any number of fronts.

Yesterday in the SMH we had another Paul McGeough ripper, with more insights into the mindset and machinations of many of the actors on the ground in Iraq, he also asked some hard questions the nature of Australian involvement in Wood’s rescue.

he attacks also raise serious questions about the conduct of Australian forces in Iraq. The Federal Government refuses to elaborate on the authority under which Zadaan and the other prisoners were held. Previously, it has avoided the issue of the legal right of Australian forces to take prisoners, by claiming that US forces always accompanied Australian units and that it was the Americans who formally detained any Iraqis arrested by the Australians.

And today in the Fairfax sister publication the Sunday Age we have yet another account of the events leading up to Woods release. This is interesting.

Melbourne’s Sunday Age newspaper said arrangements were made by Australian authorities for the RAAF to fly Mr Wood from Dubai to Australia as early as June 6, but they were suddenly cancelled.

Inquiries indicate that members of the emergency response team, headed by senior Australian diplomat Nick Warner, believed that Mr Wood should be freed without any payment.

Federal police in the response team argued that, by meeting the demand, they would be condoning the payment of a ransom - even though the money was being donated by Mr Wood’s family and Sydney’s Islamic community. They argued this would set a dangerous precedent.

As they say, truth is the first casualty and as far as this story goes we’ll probably never be able to revive it.

This story is also a tale of two media organizations. It’s interesting to note that while the Fairfax media have gone at this story from all angles, the News Limited stable either shoots the messengers or relays New Idea like promotional snippets of Woods ordeal to a waiting and breathless public anxious to be fed another tale of good old Aussie bullshit. Wood, mercenary to the end, and selling his story like so many wannabe starlets looking for their fifteen minutes of fame, obviously suits the News Limited template of what counts as news.

The Weekend in Politics

All sorts of (exciting?) things are going on in Australian politics at the moment.

John Anderson has stepped down. Aside from the revelation that he is Peter Costello’s best buddy, the nation’s reaction is likely to be “like. whatever.” Even the story about generational change in the Liberal Party getting an impetus didn’t develop any legs. Perhaps because with a birthday in April 1956, Vaile is older than Anderson (November of the same year).

The real focus on the Nats is on Barnaby. Barnaby’s done well for himself, distinguished now by being known, like Cher, Bono and Madonna, only by his first name. I think he’ll have to be a bit of a rebel in Canberra after all the publicity. If not, you can bet the farm on him being a one-term Senator.

Craig Emerson has a bit of a dummy spit at not getting back on the front bench and rails against class politics, giving Dennis Shanahan a hook for a more confusing than usual op-ed piece. It’s all weird, says Denis. Howard is the workers’ friend, but don’t mention class.

Shanahan also notes that Bob Brown is crowing about the Greens’ new economic credibility, because they didn’t reject the budget schedules. Excuse me, Mr Brown, remember the last minor party leader who tried to establish “tough” economic credentials. Bye, Meg.

Reshuffle winner Lindsay Tanner quite correctly notes that Howard’s “economic reform agenda” has no further items on it after Telstra is sold, IR “reformed” and um… that’s it actually. They’re too busy setting up federal Technical colleges and um, well, what else has the government done for you lately? That’s right. “It’s the tax cuts, stupid”. Tanner astutely notes that the government really is the friend of producer interests everywhere. Top end of town all round.

Other reshuffle winners and losers. Ferguson goes from Immigration, Crean slips further into oblivion, and Peter Garrett can dust off his old t-shirts. Good. Not so sure about the politics unless Labor can pull together.

Die you sexy women…

The latest in the loony take control of women’s bodies agenda from US Republicans. About 70% of cases of cervical cancer - which as a lot of women know, has few symptoms to start off with, but is generally deadly if it’s not detected promptly - come from infection with the the human papilloma virus. Two American pharma companies have developed a vaccine which, if administered before girls become sexually active, would protect them against HPV and thus, when they are much older, against resultant cervical cancer. The response of the “culture of life” mob?

Wonderful, you are probably thinking, all we need to do is vaccinate girls (and boys too for good measure) before they become sexually active, around puberty, and HPV–and, in thirty or forty years, seven in ten cases of cervical cancer–goes poof. Not so fast: We’re living in God’s country now. The Christian right doesn’t like the sound of this vaccine at all. “Giving the HPV vaccine to young women could be potentially harmful,” Bridget Maher of the Family Research Council told the British magazine New Scientist, “because they may see it as a license to engage in premarital sex”.

Katha Pollitt, writing in the Nation, has them sussed. The pro-life choice for girls is virginity or death. There has to be an 80s t-shirt that would express this sentiment precisely.

Saturday Salon

An open thread where you can, at your weekend leisure, discuss whatever you like.

Music + Chickens = Friday Fun

Yesterday I went to 78 Records in the city and bought a few CDs instead of working hard on the magazine I’ve got to have finished sometime in the next five minutes. Hey! That’s procrastination for you. (Exhibit A: all my comments on this blog.)

This must be the best music store in Perth — if anyone knows of any other places that have a similarly decent selection, and are staffed by friendly music nerds who will always compliment me on my exceedingly good taste in music, let me know. The only thing I don’t like about 78 Records is the cavernous space above your head that opens up when you step in the door; CD shops need to be enclosed and a bit dreary, a refuge for those those with tousled hair and fashion sense frozen on the day they first heard Nirvana’s ‘Smells Like Teen Spirit’ or, whatever one’s own personal music nerd muse moment might have been. NB, this is not my musical nerd muse moment, which I may reveal later if hassled.

I picked up Iron & Wine’s Woman King, Sleater Kinney’s The Woods and a little four-track CD from Brisbane band The Grates. All are very good, Iron & Wine’s ‘WomanKing’ track itself is particularly great in this weird hippie-sci-fi-apocalyptic way, it’s kind of 70s and all very singalongable. My partner did make the mistake of asking if it were the John Butler Trio’s new song, to which I replied, “pfffft, take your non-music nerdishness away from me, silly man, this is not didactic quasi-folk from that annoyingly earnest dread-locked hippy!”

Actually I am ashamed of myself that it has taken me this long to get into Iron & Wine, but now I have to share the love. And please don’t hate me for not being into John Butler. I’m sympathetic to his aims and all, but the dreadlocks squick me.

The Grates are best known for the ‘Trampoline’ song that accompanied that Just Jeans add. Ya know, it goes “Use your bed like a trampoline! Higher! Higher!” It’s cute and poppy and I like playing it in the car.

And, finally… Sleater Kinney ROCKS. Put away that piffling Donnas album, my little feminist rock chicks, and get yourself a big old dose of ROCK. Yeah! I feel better now. There’s these amazing guitar moments that are just so aggressively cool. Who says women don’t do rock music? No-one? Good!

I know I am tres uncool because I have not succumbed to the wonderfulness that is the iPod and I am actually suggesting that you go out and buy some CDs rather than downloading tracks, but there it is. I am a luddite, but I like buying objects and not files from the vast machine. I’m sure the iPod will insinuate itself into my life sooner or later, but for now I reject perfectly portable music for the clumsiness of the CD player.

Also, this is the funny.

Tortuous Reasoning VI

My promised response to the latest article from the Deakin Law School op/ed stable and the continuing ramifications of the torture issue, among other matters, has now been published at Online Opinion.

Hoping for a bumpy ride

I’ve been watching closely the mayhem that is Canadian politics and wondering if, with the coming Senate changes, we are also in for an equally unstable period of politics.

While I know that a newly compliant Senate does change a lot - a situation that is relatively unique to Australian politics - this will really be much the same as that experienced permanently in Canada where the Senate really is ‘unrepresentative swill’ because new members and vacancies are appointed by the Government (PM) of the day.

In practice the Canadian upper house is supposed to act as a house of sober review, but in reality it’s populated by a bunch of drunks and political hacks (the perfect repository for someone like Laurie Ferguson by the way). Despite the useless appendage that the upper house really is, Canadian democracy, politics and society continue, however crazily, to function. It functioned when the Canadian Liberals had total control, and it functions in a minority situation with the NDP as a reticent partner and the renewed Conservatives in opposition; it also functions with a strong Quebec based political party dedicated to the break-up of the country. I think the same will also apply here whatever the outcomes. .

Total dominance does not automatically suggest stability for a government. In fact the total dominance held by the Canadian Liberals since the destruction of the old Progressive Conservatives (oxymoron alert) has led to its present precarious position. Yes, we can call it hubris, but mostly it was political greed. Were it not for an ineffective and nutty opposition they would be out on their arses.

In this new scenario for Australia there is a lot of potential for mischief making, and certainly the junior party in the Coalition (and the other minor parties) will have a renewed reason to exist and work harder. Will Mark Vaile and Warren Truss, in this situation, maintain discipline and resist the temptation to act as an unofficial opposition and just make up the numbers, or will they, sensing a opportunity to show their relevance to electorates they would like to reclaim and represent, flex their muscle in the Senate?

As an outsider I’ve never really understood the Nationals permanent affiliation with the Liberals, at first glance I had always thought that their best chance to make a difference stood in being at arms length from a party that just pays lip service to their concerns, and slowly steals their constituency, or in a loose coalition with the Labor Party. Hopefully they will wake up and realise that the decline in their political fortunes are a direct result of not representing their constituencies effectively, this is evidenced by the number of independents that notionally would be National Party members, who now represent seats formerly held by them.

Secondly, history shows that when oppositions and minor parties get their act together, a good and creative understanding of political and media tactics can be used very effectively in what may on the surface appear to be a losing political position. In effect, opposition can work. That’s why Labor’s tactic to oppose the tax cuts was a good one. And that’s why the Nationals should now be crazy brave and walk out of the Coalition.

For Labor, opposing the tax cuts started the process in beginning a more effective policy difference. You’ve got to start somewhere; tax cuts are just the economic equivalent of red cordial and need to be exposed as such. At least on this issue Beazley stood for something other than yet another case of metooism.

And for the Nationals, walking away from the Coalition might on the surface look self destructive, but could also do much to rejuvinate the party and the political scene in Australia by bringing another independent political force into play, with the consequence of increased relevance to their electorates and the possibility of winning back some of their core constituency. In the current situation they are on a losing proposition so they might as well take the radical option.

Lets hope for a bumpy ride.

Culture of Lesbianism

I was going to write a post on the new Hilary-hating book that makes insinuations about her sexuality based on an assertion that when she went to college, she was surrounded by a “culture of lesbianism”. Sounds cool, yeah? But Jess Ausculture, guesting at MsFits’ abode, has beaten me to it with a post composed in her inimitable style so go read her!

Incidentally, Gallop found in 1999 that 95% of Americans say they would vote for a woman as President. They’re not so accepting of gays and lesbians (59%) but we score higher than atheists (49%). Australia has had at least one gay state Premier, Don Dunstan in SA, but the truth of his sexuality wasn’t revealed til long after he left office. I wonder if any similar questions have been asked in Australian polls, and what the answers would be?

Rating the house down?

The crass nature of BB is causing all sorts of interesting comment, as they say, it’s a bar-b-que stopper, but how is it really playing out there in TV land?

By that I mean the marketplace. You know, the final arbiter on the success and failure of everything. Is there really a place for a show like BB? And is it really rating? What do the kids think? The Oztam ratings for BB over the past four weeks show a peak leading to a decline, with the show not even in the top 25 for the past week.

May 23 921,070, May 30 997,288, June 6 1,188,443, June 13 1,113,245, June 20 923,539.

This article in the Australian sums it up.

Sydney schoolgirl Daniella Cosentino, 16, said her friends watched more of Uncut than the PG-rated version - which features the daily activities of the housemates (usually sitting around talking) - because it was more amusing and revolved around sex.

“At my age, most of our conversations are all about sex, so it’s more relevant to my age group,” she said.

Daniella said she did not take offence at the derogatory comments male housemates made about women, or the way they behaved - including Michael exposing his penis while massaging Gianna, or Hotdogs trying to grope Vesna and calling her a “whore”.

Asked what she thought about the outcry over Uncut, Daniella said parents should make their children turn it off.

“There’s no point in the politicians trying to stop everybody,” she said.

Out of the mouths of babes. Maybe the kids are seeing a different kind of BB and aren’t consuming the show in the same way we are.

How Broad is the Church?

Taking time out from his customary attacks on PC in schools, Kevin Donnelly has turned his attention to dissing Petro Georgiou:

While the Liberal Party might be a broad church, the fact is the member for Kooyong’s views on issues like mandatory detention and asylum-seekers are so out of the ball park that he would be better suited joining the Democrats or the Greens.

Dr Donnelly appears to be taking his talking points here from the Young Libs’ Alex Hawke, rather than the PM, who’s recently called for a thousand flowers to bloom and a thousand schools of thought to contend.

But I wouldn’t at all be surprised if Donnelly’s view is closer to that held by many Liberals than the PM’s spin.

Anyway, it’s good to see some honesty about the 2001 election from a prominent Liberal, rather than the usual disclaimers:

Under Prime Minister Howard, the Coalition Government has consistently argued for border protection and for taking a hard line on illegal asylum-seekers. Political pundits argue that the 2001 federal election was won on the issue and last year the Australian electorate overwhelmingly endorsed the Government’s stand.

Disability: A Personal Story

His face is twisted, red and purple blotches smear across his straining cheeks, spit hangs from his grimacing mouth. He is hammering his own fists into his chest, with a rib-breaking bang bang bang and all the while he is making a horrible, repetitive “nah nah nah” grunting sound.

The teenage girls dart away from him in a flurry of blue school skirts, with sniggering laughs, one runs up to flick his baseball cap and just misses his flailing fist. There’s a rubbish bin and he suddenly lunges for it and throws it at one of the girls, it smashes beside her and pie wrappers and coke cans fly off in every direction. The girls start screaming and there’s a teacher there and I am too, I run to my brother and grab his hands even though he’s so big and I try to stop his fists from bruising his chest again.

The teacher takes him to the office and he’s too distraught to speak clearly for a while, he evades their eyes and his agitation grows as they try to find out what happened. It was one of the younger girls, they like to tease him, he’s a lumbering boy and they run up and try to knock his cap off his head.

Every day, every recess, he likes to take empty coke bottles and pretend to play the drums on a bench and these girls, these little bitches, they try to take his cap or his wallet and sometimes they’re nice, they pretend they like him and then they steal his packet of chips. He puts up with it for a while and then he snaps, once a week, every second day, every lunchtime. He’s thirteen years old.

He is three years younger than me and I resent him, like I resent the end of the school holidays, like I resent my glasses and tests and other people, but I will protect him as much as I can. It’s not much. I can’t do much. I feel the stares of the boys as I walk back to my lunch and know they think it’s somehow stupid to get involved. That we’re both freaks, the retarded boy and his chubby, sullen sister. I sit down and return to my sandwich. My friends pretend nothing has happened. Nothing will happen again every week or so until I leave high school.

He is four or five years old and he loves his Winnie the Pooh video and watches it every day. One day we are playing in the yard. It has been raining. I go back inside and when I come out he’s taken off his clothes and has wandered down the driveway. Mum comes out as I call her and we hurry up the driveway as he lies down in the big mud puddle and rolls around.

He smiles his beautiful smile up at us, his icy blonde hair plastered down with mud. “I wanted to be a little black rain cloud,” he says, and we remember his Winnie the Pooh video, where the bear does the same thing to try and steal honey. For a moment he seems like a normal boy.

He was the most gorgeous child, with his see-through skin and his brilliant blue eyes. It was when he was about two that my parents began to suspect that something was different, when words didn’t come and toilet training was impossible. It took several years for a diagnosis, and by then I’d grown to hate him, this changeling in our family. He used to shit himself regularly and I called him the “pooey monster” and would run away from him. As we grew older he found my sneezes (common with hayfever) so painful that he’d start banging himself in the ears if I sneezed. He would take off his clothes at the worst possible moments. He was embarrassing and humiliating and I hated him. But I loved him too, though it’s harder to remember that, and I got into a fight with a girl at school once who teased him. I used to dream that I would wake up and he would be normal.

Now he is 23 and we are working in my parent’s shop and I am teasing him about his girlfriend. She is 40 and lives in Mildura. I say, “You need a girlfriend your own age.” He says, with a small little dip of his head, his eyes sliding away and his skin flushing just a little, “but none of the girls like me”. He knows he is different.

He works in my parents’ shop all day. I have come home for four weeks so my parents and other brother can go on holidays. He didn’t want to go because they’re going to Vietnam and Cambodia and he doesn’t think he’ll like the food. He like chips and pies and McDonalds, so my parents ask me to stay with him, run their business, while I’m between writing jobs.

He works as hard as anyone I’ve ever met, harder than I do, but no-one except Mum and Dad will give him a job. So, they mortgaged their house, they put their lives on hold, and they bought a business which they now work in every day of the week.

My mother told me the other day how she worries about what will happen when they grow tired of the never-ending work. “I’m weary,” she said. “I need a rest. But what will your brother do if we sell the shop?” It’s a good question, and one echoed by my own questions: What will we do when my parents aren’t around?

My brother was diagnosed with Autism as a small child, but in recent years it seems his diagnosis is probably closer to Asperger’s Syndrome, as he is extremely high functioning in many ways. He doesn’t require 24-hour supervision. He works and he interacts with others on a very mature level, his aggression issues have settled down, the taunting of girls no longer bothers him.

He couldn’t get work in our small town until my parents bought the business they now run. He is their main employee and works from 7am to 7pm every weekday, and spends his money on CDs and baseball caps and trips with the local sheltered workshop group. If my parents weren’t around he’d be living on the disability pension.

My brother works hard, but he couldn’t get work elsewhere because people don’t like to be confronted by the unnatural, the not normal, the way he doesn’t like to meet their eyes and how he gets stuck on certain topics and sometimes he forgets to brush his teeth. But he’s not so strange. He’s a big boy and he loves to eat, he hates to shave and his favourite t-shirts have sports logos on them. He loves Metallica and Eminem and playing his Xbox. He gives me a big hug every time I come home and tells me how much he misses me.

If something happens to my parents, I am his legal guardian. I’ve been so since I was 21. I will do my best to look after him, and I see his worth as a human being again and again. But I know it will be hard, and I hope it won’t happen for many years, not just because I love my family and don’t want anything to happen to them, but also because I’m afraid of the responsibility.

I tell this story because it is people like my brother who fall between the cracks of economic rhetoric and political chatter. There are hundreds of thousands of such stories, such lives. Sometimes, yes, there are people who take advantage of the system. But many, many times, there is genuine need, only in our world, there isn’t much room for people like my brother. We’re all told to be productive and buy houses and do these things to be good citizens. We are a good society, a productive society, we pat ourselves on the back for our hard work, we deserve it.

I don’t think this success measures what sort of people we really are. I think the true evaluation of our worth is how we treat the poor, the dispossessed, the disabled. Yes, personal responsibility is important, but so is the way we treat those who cannot take that responsibility, through no fault of their own. My brother didn’t ask to be born disabled, yet he is, and he is as much a part of our society, contributing as much as a wealthy stockbroker or a politician.

My brother doesn’t deserve our pity. What he and the thousands of others like him do deserve is our support.

The Politics of Poetics or the Poetics of Politics

Picking up on Rob’s comment on Naomi’s excellent post:

Good writing always wins me over, whatever my politics, or those (that? - has to be a thread there) of the writer.

Can good writing move and inspire regardless of its politics? I think so - I certainly don’t identify with Tolstoy’s Christian mystical anarchism or Evelyn Waugh’s Tory reactionary nostalgia, but I love their work.

Today in sport

So is the biff ok in any modern contact sport? Many of these sports, particularly the football codes, are manly games played by manly men in manly ways, so a bit of extracurricular activity is to be expected, just not in the showers. But how much?

A Canadian sports promoter plans to test this with an Ice Hockey biff fest. Yep, no Hockey, just the biff. Gotta love this quote.

“It’s a capitalist idea,” he said. “If left-wing people of the world don’t like it, I don’t care.”

Strangely, some folks are not happy. They must be left wing.

A lot of minor hockey organizations are doing all they can to get violence out of the game, and this is just promoting more violence in hockey and sending a bad message to the children.

Damn, it’s always about the children, what about our fun?

To love Ice Hockey is to love the goon, as Rodney Dangerfield once said, “I went to a fight the other night and a hockey game broke out”. It’s a great sport, I think it’s the greatest team sport; certainly it’s the fastest. And it has the best fights this side of Mark Geyer and Wally Lewis.

The blurb from the Battle of the Hockey Enforcers says it all.

Watch 16 of the world’s toughest best hockey fighters throw down in a series of battles, presented in tournament style, to be crowed the champion. To advance, players will meet at center ice, when the puck drops, the gloves are off.

So, do lefties like a bit of the biff in sport? Or is this reserved for Young Liberals at branch stacking meetings?

Nipple slipping their way into a morass

When things are not going well on the policy front, when you’re losing the battle on a serious front, conservatives love to go looking for a values and morality wedge or diversion, so lets not forget that this is the party that champions family values and yet locks up women and children behind razor wire for years.

And here it is, today’s diversion, the “debased values and morality” of Big Brother.

Given the forelock tugging by Australian conservatives I suppose it’s not a surprise that we now have to once again witness a parroting of imported American style language and attitudes into our cultural and social environment. Similar to our American cousins, noted prudes Trish Draper and Peter Lindsay would like television to meet so called higher standards of decency and morality and with greater public input, so, in the absence of a willing brain dead Australian, or another boatload of refugees, Big Brother will have to do.

Of course, this is also coming from the party that once had Ross Cameron carry this shield, only for him to be carried out from the field of battle on it, Given Cameron’s experiences I’d suggest Draper and Lindsay tread very carefully onto this hot, damp, well lubricated and moaning ground.