Go swear

The ACTU now has a “Rights at Work Pledge”, which might also be an oath. The difference between a pledge and an oath? An oath, I gather, must have a witness (as in, ‘I swear on the grave of …’ etc). Arguably, the last line of the ACTU’s pledge could qualify it as an oath, as the implication is that the pledge is collectively witnessed. I’d like it to be an oath, given the great and glorious tradition of oath-taking. Quickly diving into some nearby authorities, I learn from Marc Bloch that back in the 11th century the then left – the rising bourgeois; the uppity merchants who lived by commerce in new fang-dangled life-styles called urban communities – drove their priests and nobles nuts by subverting the feudal oath of aid and friendship. You see, the longstanding feudal oath had only been between inferior and superior, making the one subject to the other. The distinctive feature of the communal oath that was introduced by the contemptible commercial urban radical, emerging beneath the noble and churchman with a bad attitude toward stratified society, was that it was an oath sworn between equals. Where you stand, of course, depends on where you sit. Thus, from E P Thompson I further learn how it came to pass a half-a-dozen or so centuries later that the (by this time, all powerful) bourgeoisie themselves went right off the mutual oath, upon discovering that solemn and dreadful versions were being sworn in nocturnal ceremonies to bind workers to kill bad masters. The usual crackdown by the powerful ensued, and so, after enjoying something of a revival in the early 19th century, oath-taking fell into disuse following the government’s reciprocal revival of slumbering sedition laws (and a well known prosecution in 1834). Hence, it’s pleasing to see the oath making a comeback. The ACTU’s pledge is not quite what I’d call awe-inspiring, but it’s not bad either. You can sign it here.

Share this...
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • e-mail

9 Responses to “Go swear”


  1. 1 liamNo Gravatar

    Very well, I’m sworn in.
    They need not say the fault is ours if blood should stain the wattle!

  2. 2 Peter KempNo Gravatar

    Moi aussi Monsieur Combet. There are other oaths of a polemical nature but perhaps they are better expressed collectively to his darkness and minions in the appropriate forums/battles to come.

  3. 3 MarkNo Gravatar

    I quite like nocturnal oaths. Ghosts often insist on them. Indeed perhaps those of the martyr’d dead from a certain song. Witness Hamlet:

    Ham.
    Neuer make known what you haue seene to night
    Both.
    My lord, we will not.
    Ham.
    Nay but sweare.
    840
    Hor.
    In faith my Lord not I.
    Mar.
    Nor I my Lord in faith.
    Ham.
    Nay vpon my sword, indeed vpon my sword.
    845
    Gho.
    Sweare.
    845
    The Gost vnder the stage.
    Ham.
    Ha, ha, come you here, this fellow in the sellerige,
    Here consent to sweare.
    Hor.
    Propose the oth my Lord.
    850
    Ham.
    Neuer to speake what you haue seene to night,
    Sweare by my sword.
    Gost.
    Sweare.
    Ham.
    Hic & vbique; nay then weele shift our ground:
    Come hither Gentlemen, and lay your handes
    855
    Againe vpon this sword, neuer to speake
    Of that which you haue seene, sweare by my sword.
    Ghost
    Sweare.
    Ham.
    Well said old Mole, can’st worke in the earth?
    so fast, a worthy Pioner, once more remoue.
    Hor.
    Day and night but this is wondrous strange.
    Ham.
    And therefore as a stranger giue it welcome,
    There are more things in the heauen and earth Horatio,
    Then are Dream’t of, in your philosophie,
    But come here, as before you neuer shall
    How strange or odde soere I beare my selfe,
    As I perchance hereafter shall thinke meet,
    To put an Anticke disposition on,
    That you at such times seeing me, neuer shall
    870
    With Armes, incombred thus, or this head shake,
    Or by pronouncing some vndoubtfull phrase,
    As well well, wee know, or wee could and if we would,
    Or there be, and if they might, or such ambiguous:
    Giuing out to note, that you know aught of mee,
    875
    This not to doe, so grace, and mercie
    At your most need helpe you, sweare
    Ghost.
    sweare.
    Ham.
    Rest, rest, perturbed spirit: so gentlemen,
    880
    In all my loue I do commend mee to you,
    And what so poore a man as Hamlet may,
    To pleasure you, God willing shall not want,
    Nay come lett’s go together,
    But stil your fingers on your lippes I pray,
    885
    The time is out of ioynt, O cursed spite,
    That euer I was borne to set it right,
    Nay come lett’s go together.

  4. 4 csNo Gravatar

    Umm, I think a little formatting might assist with that one Mark.

  5. 5 liamNo Gravatar

    My favourite is:

    …They are the faction. O conspiracy,
    Sham’st thou to show thy dangerous brow by night,
    When evils are most free? O, then, by day
    Where wilt thou find a cavern dark enough
    To mask thy monstrous visage?

    Julius Caesar, II.I 77-81

  6. 6 MarkNo Gravatar

    I dare say, Chris, but sadly I’m too tired and going to sleep. The code doesn’t seem to have come across from the webpage where I grabbed it from the first folio.

  7. 7 NabakovNo Gravatar

    Fuck Shakespeare. I’ve always felt the most apposite Elizabethean quote for internet argy-bargy is Kit Marlowe from “The Jew Of Malta”.

    “What, dares the villain write in such base terms?
    ” I did it — and revenge it, if thou dar’st.”

    But ultimately, when it comes down to this kind of thing, then you can always depend on Doc Johnson to rise to the occasion.

    “Among those whose reputation is exhausted in a short time by its own luxuriance, are the writers who take advantage of present incidents or characters which strongly interest the passions and engage universal attention…. To the quick circulation of such productions all the motives of interest and vanity concur; the disputant enlarges his knowledge. the zealot animates his passion, and every man is desirous to inform himself concerning affairs so vehemently agitated and variously represented.

    It is, indeed, the fate of controvertists, even when they contend for philosophical or theological truth, to be soon laid aside and slighted. Either the question is decided, and there is no more place for doubt and opposition; or mankind despairs of understanding it, and grow weary of disturbance, content themselves with quiet ignorance, and refuse to be harrassed with labours which they have no hopes of recompensing with knowledge.”

    Sound familar?

  8. 8 Tony DNo Gravatar

    The header on my Firefox page reads “Go swear at Larvatus Prodeo”

    Crap!

  9. 9 csNo Gravatar

    I had to read it three times Nabs (would Doc J have survived in the ’sphere? Discuss.); but yes, it captures the ephemeral essence of blogging on controversial current affairs perfectly.

Leave a Reply

Please read the comments policy. If you would like an icon beside your comment, please register a Gravatar.

There is a Comments Preview function below the typing box which activates when you start typing.

Allowed tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Examples:

<strong>Strong</strong>= Strong
<em>Emphasized</em> = Emphasized
<a href="http://www.url.com">Linked text</a>= Linked text
<blockquote>Quoted Text</blockquote>