<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The trouble with the left</title>
	<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/</link>
	<description>Blogging politics, culture, sociology and life from Brisvegas</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Soon</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-114627</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Soon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-114627</guid>
		<description>You're only saying that cos you're lying and a TAXEATER, Nabs. But we've found you out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re only saying that cos you&#8217;re lying and a TAXEATER, Nabs. But we&#8217;ve found you out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-114336</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-114336</guid>
		<description>Btw - that's true about Bollywood. A lot of Indian Muslims (who are mostly poor and discriminated against) have made quite a splash in Bollywood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw - that&#8217;s true about Bollywood. A lot of Indian Muslims (who are mostly poor and discriminated against) have made quite a splash in Bollywood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-114334</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-114334</guid>
		<description>Hard one to research, Nabs.

Anyway, your discussion of wines has inspired me to have a nice Tokay before I go to sleep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard one to research, Nabs.</p>
<p>Anyway, your discussion of wines has inspired me to have a nice Tokay before I go to sleep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nabakov</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-114333</link>
		<dc:creator>Nabakov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-114333</guid>
		<description>"I thought Thailand produced more transexuals." 

Are you talking per capita or in absolute terms?

The current copy of the OECD Yearbook I have to hand appears strangely reticent on this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I thought Thailand produced more transexuals.&#8221; </p>
<p>Are you talking per capita or in absolute terms?</p>
<p>The current copy of the OECD Yearbook I have to hand appears strangely reticent on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-114324</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-114324</guid>
		<description>I thought Thailand produced more transexuals. But I defer to you on that one, Nabs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Thailand produced more transexuals. But I defer to you on that one, Nabs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nabakov</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-114323</link>
		<dc:creator>Nabakov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-114323</guid>
		<description>The trouble with the left is the same trouble with the right. That they both persist in using such 20th century terminology to describe what they think they should stand for.

I put it to y'all that notions of class struggle and free market panceas are increasingly  irrelevant in the strange new globalised world now emerging where our internet and telephony access machines are now made more cheaply in a centralised command economy like China then anywhere else while Bollywood offers far more chance of upward mobility than Broadway. A world where Brazil is the second largest producer of commuter aircraft and the first largest producer of transexuals. 

The comforting certainies of the last century are withering up and burning off like a chequebook (remember them?) in a microwave.

Discussing Left and Right now is like debating the merits of the Burgundy and Rhine wines offered in the Hindenburg's dining parlour as it wallows in to dock at Lakehurst Naval Air Station.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trouble with the left is the same trouble with the right. That they both persist in using such 20th century terminology to describe what they think they should stand for.</p>
<p>I put it to y&#8217;all that notions of class struggle and free market panceas are increasingly  irrelevant in the strange new globalised world now emerging where our internet and telephony access machines are now made more cheaply in a centralised command economy like China then anywhere else while Bollywood offers far more chance of upward mobility than Broadway. A world where Brazil is the second largest producer of commuter aircraft and the first largest producer of transexuals. </p>
<p>The comforting certainies of the last century are withering up and burning off like a chequebook (remember them?) in a microwave.</p>
<p>Discussing Left and Right now is like debating the merits of the Burgundy and Rhine wines offered in the Hindenburg&#8217;s dining parlour as it wallows in to dock at Lakehurst Naval Air Station.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-114276</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-114276</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://castironbalcony.media2.org/?p=229" rel="nofollow"&gt;Trackback&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://castironbalcony.media2.org/?p=229" rel="nofollow">Trackback</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sai Ngan Fai chai</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-113083</link>
		<dc:creator>Sai Ngan Fai chai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 06:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-113083</guid>
		<description>Michael G , sorry about copying the text clumsily . I don't want to get into a debate about Wiki it's just as with any controversy there are points of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael G , sorry about copying the text clumsily . I don&#8217;t want to get into a debate about Wiki it&#8217;s just as with any controversy there are points of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael G</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112865</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112865</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Citation needed? &lt;/strong&gt;It was over 2000 years ago after all. Not to mention standards of pacifism were different. Not to mention we weren't talking about Pacifism but Toleration. Not to mention it isn't even the facts which are claimed but uncited in the article - it is &lt;em&gt; the belief of some people!&lt;/em&gt;

Nevertheless you could be right - more likely have an agenda - I couldn't be bothered checking. If you want to make a case you'll have to do better than that FaiChai - if that is your reaL name. You could start by clicking on the link to the edicts of Ashoka. You'll find it right beneath the&lt;a href="http://http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashoka" rel="nofollow"&gt; 5 line section &lt;/a&gt;labelled &lt;strong&gt;controversy&lt;/strong&gt; in the wiki article which you have reproduced in full.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Citation needed? </strong>It was over 2000 years ago after all. Not to mention standards of pacifism were different. Not to mention we weren&#8217;t talking about Pacifism but Toleration. Not to mention it isn&#8217;t even the facts which are claimed but uncited in the article - it is <em> the belief of some people!</em></p>
<p>Nevertheless you could be right - more likely have an agenda - I couldn&#8217;t be bothered checking. If you want to make a case you&#8217;ll have to do better than that FaiChai - if that is your reaL name. You could start by clicking on the link to the edicts of Ashoka. You&#8217;ll find it right beneath the<a href="http://http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashoka" rel="nofollow"> 5 line section </a>labelled <strong>controversy</strong> in the wiki article which you have reproduced in full.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weathergirl</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112855</link>
		<dc:creator>weathergirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 11:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112855</guid>
		<description>Jason, LQ is right-wing hetero.

He's simply an agent provocateur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, LQ is right-wing hetero.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s simply an agent provocateur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faichai</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112848</link>
		<dc:creator>Faichai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112848</guid>
		<description>From the ever reliable wiki-
"There is a controversy over the belief that a "quick change" took place in Ashoka's character. It is sometimes believed that Buddhists of the time wanted to establish that Ashoka's conversion to Buddhism changed his character from negative to positive. So in they depicted his "change in character" in an exaggerated manner.[citation needed] Others believe it is likely that Ashoka's sudden change of heart was nothing more than a consolidation strategy, designed to appease the newly conquered territories, as Ashoka made no move towards granting those territories conquered through bloody war, their independence.[citation needed]
 Apparently he was ruthless conqueror then a pacifist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the ever reliable wiki-<br />
&#8220;There is a controversy over the belief that a &#8220;quick change&#8221; took place in Ashoka&#8217;s character. It is sometimes believed that Buddhists of the time wanted to establish that Ashoka&#8217;s conversion to Buddhism changed his character from negative to positive. So in they depicted his &#8220;change in character&#8221; in an exaggerated manner.[citation needed] Others believe it is likely that Ashoka&#8217;s sudden change of heart was nothing more than a consolidation strategy, designed to appease the newly conquered territories, as Ashoka made no move towards granting those territories conquered through bloody war, their independence.[citation needed]<br />
 Apparently he was ruthless conqueror then a pacifist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Soon</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112769</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Soon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 06:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112769</guid>
		<description>Ironically for his dualisms, LQ claims to be of the Left. I've been struggling to understand where he's coming from. He seems to hate you guys a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironically for his dualisms, LQ claims to be of the Left. I&#8217;ve been struggling to understand where he&#8217;s coming from. He seems to hate you guys a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael G</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112768</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 06:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112768</guid>
		<description>Addicted to dualisms. I like that.

It's especially silly when there are causal relationships between x and y.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Addicted to dualisms. I like that.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s especially silly when there are causal relationships between x and y.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katz</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112759</link>
		<dc:creator>Katz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 05:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112759</guid>
		<description>LQ is a typical example of Right Wing opinionators who are addicted to dualisms.

Their arguments go this way:

"You can't claim X is Y, because Z is a worse example of Y." I caught CL pulling the same dumb stunt just the other day.

So what if Christians aren't as brutish as Muslims? Does this make Christian brutishness more tolerable? Of course not.

Unfortunately, the Christian nightmare has been the burden of the West for a long time. Many more Westerners have been tortured to death by Christians than by Muslims. Those who remember this are rightly suspicious of any special pleading by Christians that they deserve better treatment than the average co-dependant of a homocidal maniac.

Does this make Muslim fanatics more tolerable? Of course not.

It's just silly for LQ and his ilk to suggest otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LQ is a typical example of Right Wing opinionators who are addicted to dualisms.</p>
<p>Their arguments go this way:</p>
<p>&#8220;You can&#8217;t claim X is Y, because Z is a worse example of Y.&#8221; I caught CL pulling the same dumb stunt just the other day.</p>
<p>So what if Christians aren&#8217;t as brutish as Muslims? Does this make Christian brutishness more tolerable? Of course not.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the Christian nightmare has been the burden of the West for a long time. Many more Westerners have been tortured to death by Christians than by Muslims. Those who remember this are rightly suspicious of any special pleading by Christians that they deserve better treatment than the average co-dependant of a homocidal maniac.</p>
<p>Does this make Muslim fanatics more tolerable? Of course not.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just silly for LQ and his ilk to suggest otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael G</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112756</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 05:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112756</guid>
		<description>http://72.14.235.104/search?q=cache:j6zoXCa1M_YJ:concise.britannica.com/ebc/article-9355933/Ashoka+ashoka+toleration&#38;hl=en&#38;gl=au&#38;ct=clnk&#38;cd=4&#38;client=firefox-a</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://72.14.235.104/search?q=cache:j6zoXCa1M_YJ:concise.britannica.com/ebc/article-9355933/Ashoka+ashoka+toleration&amp;hl=en&amp;gl=au&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=4&amp;client=firefox-a" rel="nofollow">http://72.14.235.104/search?q=cache:j6zoXCa1M_YJ:concise.britannica.com/ebc/article-9355933/Ashoka+ashoka+toleration&amp;hl=en&amp;gl=au&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=4&amp;client=firefox-a</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael G</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112754</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 05:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112754</guid>
		<description>I can't quite top Liam but, we should also remember buddhist convert and Emperor Ashoka who was spreading the toleration word during the 4th Century BC &lt;a href="http://http://72.14.235.104/search?q=cache:j6zoXCa1M_YJ:concise.britannica.com/ebc/article-9355933/Ashoka+ashoka+toleration&#38;hl=en&#38;gl=au&#38;ct=clnk&#38;cd=4&#38;client=firefox-a" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t quite top Liam but, we should also remember buddhist convert and Emperor Ashoka who was spreading the toleration word during the 4th Century BC <a href="http://http://72.14.235.104/search?q=cache:j6zoXCa1M_YJ:concise.britannica.com/ebc/article-9355933/Ashoka+ashoka+toleration&amp;hl=en&amp;gl=au&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=4&amp;client=firefox-a" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katz</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112750</link>
		<dc:creator>Katz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 05:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112750</guid>
		<description>Good to see that you mum hasn't confiscated your mouse LQ.

Your nephew has some very interesting books. But perhaps either you or he coloured over the bit that indicated that the year the Edict of Milan of 312 was 13 years before the Council of Nicaea.

And perhaps you weren't listening to your very well informed nephew when he told you that the Council of Nicaea is remarkable for its intolerance to heterodoxy within Christianity.

Your nephew may also inform you, if you ask him very politely, that this intra-Christian intolerance became quite a feature in Europe of oh, 1500 years or so.

Yes, you are indeed quite curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see that you mum hasn&#8217;t confiscated your mouse LQ.</p>
<p>Your nephew has some very interesting books. But perhaps either you or he coloured over the bit that indicated that the year the Edict of Milan of 312 was 13 years before the Council of Nicaea.</p>
<p>And perhaps you weren&#8217;t listening to your very well informed nephew when he told you that the Council of Nicaea is remarkable for its intolerance to heterodoxy within Christianity.</p>
<p>Your nephew may also inform you, if you ask him very politely, that this intra-Christian intolerance became quite a feature in Europe of oh, 1500 years or so.</p>
<p>Yes, you are indeed quite curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112741</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 05:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112741</guid>
		<description>LeftistQueers, &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrus_the_Great" rel="nofollow"&gt;King Cyrus of Persia&lt;/a&gt; did the polyethnic religiously tolerant thing long before the Romans, and better.
&lt;blockquote&gt;humanityâ€™s first ever act of genocide&lt;/blockquote&gt;
You've got to be kidding. The Romans did genocide better than most, and they're just the earliest to leave historical records of their actions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LeftistQueers, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrus_the_Great" rel="nofollow">King Cyrus of Persia</a> did the polyethnic religiously tolerant thing long before the Romans, and better.</p>
<blockquote><p>humanityâ€™s first ever act of genocide</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;ve got to be kidding. The Romans did genocide better than most, and they&#8217;re just the earliest to leave historical records of their actions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leftist Queers</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112739</link>
		<dc:creator>Leftist Queers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 05:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112739</guid>
		<description>Katz

According to my nephew's reader religious "toleration" was totally an invention of the Romans. In fact, Rome was the most multiculti civilization that has ever existed. There was some very brief and very minor state non-toleration of Christianity. However that was a political issue as the Christians rejected the authority of the state.

My nephew directs you to various Edicts of "Toleration" including the Edicat of Milan of 312. Hop to it!

Of course, the world's first genocidally intolerant civilization was 7th century Islam. Muhammad committed humanity's first ever act of genocide when he wiped out all the Jews of Medina. After that, cooler heads prevailed and infidels were spared the sword so long as they paid a tax, the jiziyah. This tax is still at the centre of the Islamist regimes today. Indeed, it is part of the Hamas charter's plans for post Judeocide Israel

I am curious how Islam and Islamists fit into your "celebrating diversity" utopia.

Oh, how are your searches for the relevance of "terra nullius" to 18th century Australia coming along?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katz</p>
<p>According to my nephew&#8217;s reader religious &#8220;toleration&#8221; was totally an invention of the Romans. In fact, Rome was the most multiculti civilization that has ever existed. There was some very brief and very minor state non-toleration of Christianity. However that was a political issue as the Christians rejected the authority of the state.</p>
<p>My nephew directs you to various Edicts of &#8220;Toleration&#8221; including the Edicat of Milan of 312. Hop to it!</p>
<p>Of course, the world&#8217;s first genocidally intolerant civilization was 7th century Islam. Muhammad committed humanity&#8217;s first ever act of genocide when he wiped out all the Jews of Medina. After that, cooler heads prevailed and infidels were spared the sword so long as they paid a tax, the jiziyah. This tax is still at the centre of the Islamist regimes today. Indeed, it is part of the Hamas charter&#8217;s plans for post Judeocide Israel</p>
<p>I am curious how Islam and Islamists fit into your &#8220;celebrating diversity&#8221; utopia.</p>
<p>Oh, how are your searches for the relevance of &#8220;terra nullius&#8221; to 18th century Australia coming along?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katz</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112694</link>
		<dc:creator>Katz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 01:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/07/10/the-trouble-with-the-left/#comment-112694</guid>
		<description>tolÂ·erÂ·aÂ·tion (tÅ?l'É™-rÄ?'shÉ™n) 
n.
Tolerance with respect to the actions and beliefs of others: â€œToleration . . . is the greatest gift of the mindâ€? (Helen Keller).
Official recognition of the rights of individuals and groups to hold dissenting opinions, especially on religion.

&lt;a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/toleration" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tolÂ·erÂ·aÂ·tion (tÅ?l&#8217;É™-rÄ?&#8217;shÉ™n)<br />
n.<br />
Tolerance with respect to the actions and beliefs of others: â€œToleration . . . is the greatest gift of the mindâ€? (Helen Keller).<br />
Official recognition of the rights of individuals and groups to hold dissenting opinions, especially on religion.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/toleration" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
