Thankfully, you omitted a few names that became synonymous with sloth, dodginess, bullying, drunkardness and incompetence (on both sides of politics) …. However, you did mention Chalk, not really a good idea since we are all still paying through the nose for his presence in the Queensland Parliament; some may call his decisions “unwise” but other adjectives come much more readily to mind.

Whatever his faults, I’m sure Dr Flegg is a far better man than was Sir Gordon Chalk.

The outrage arises not out of whether Dr Flegg needs the money or not (it would be only small change to him) but out of the unexposed injustices that have been committed, by a thoroughly biased system, against ordinary ex-diggers injured or ill because of their war service. Of course, there is an “appeal” process …. for those with very deep pockets and all the right connections – and mixing socially with Senior Counsel and well-known experts and specialists doesn’t hurt one’s chances of getting a DVA pension one little bit.

I believe that Flegg’s situation will evoke protests from those who feel agrieved.

That may indeed happen …. but given the news media’s track-record on dealing with red-hot stuff from war veterans during an election campaign, we won’t get to hear about any of it until hours after the polls have closed.

Second, the notion that there is no Liberal talent at the State level might be a bit tough, particularly if one takes a longer historical perspective. For example, at the State level, the Liberals have had leaders such as Dr Edwards, Terry White and Gordon Chalk.

At the Federal level, current Labor representatives include Kevin Rudd, Wayne Swan, Dr Craig Emerson and Arch Bevis. I am not convinced that the average State ALP member of Parliament is somehow superior to those mentioned above.

Also I am not convinced that QLD Liberal federal members of Parliament are rare talents.

But I am open to suggestion.

PS, Flegg of the ‘blonde day’ fame is now in a fight with his private Secretary whose hair colour is decidely ???. No need to tell you the answer is there? But it is not red, brown, etc.

Douglas McDonald summed it up beautifully in his 3:12pm post.

Given that the Liberals are more interested in playing politics than in doing politics, the possibility that Flegg was deliberately sent to a shopping centre without a permit cannot be excluded. A good way to tell what’s really happening is to count the number of knives in his back at any given moment.

Douglas McDonald [at 3:12pm]:

It’s the same old story. Anyone remotely competent on the Liberal side goes into federal politics, because they can’t win in state, anyone remotely competent on the Labor side goes into state politics, since they can’t win in federal, and any truly charismatic independents go local, since they can’t win in federal or state. So we end up with hopeless Laborites in federal and hopeless Liberals in state, which just encourages more voters to entrench governments, and so the cycle continues.

How true ….. and how sad.

The only way Labor will ever lose power in the states is once they’re abolished.

Hell will freeze over before that happens.

The only way Labor will ever lose power in the states is once they’re abolished. Now THAT will shake up the party system. Once people can’t have their reliable mummy/daddy parties in different levels of government, which way will they vote?

Nice tradition. Pity it has been so weakened over the past few decades by pension-determining practices that do seem to be possibly based on rank and on one’s circle of contacts rather than on either strict internationally-accepted clinical features or on the actual nature of one’s own war service. Unfair? My oath! Just don’t expect any Royal Commission into Dept. of Veterans’ Affairs and its associated “independent” [L-O-L] authorities anytime this century; it would put too many vested interests at risk.

I dunno. Maybe Flegg’s case just might bring a few rejected and very very embittered war veterans out of the woodwork and add yet another exciting and dramatic Federal aspect to what started out as a State election.

Perhaps, state Liberal parties are under a handicap, given the propensity for some voters to refuse to give one party power at both the federal and state levels.

However, that doesn’t explain the dysfunctionality of state Liberal parties the length and breadth of Australia.

The GST settlement has proven to be a bonanza for state governments. They are flush with funds. And it appears that voters are happy with the way state ALP governments handle their spending priorities.

So long as ALP parties aren’t stampeded by law ‘n’ order and culture wars issues, they appear to be ensconced on the Treasury Benches for the foreseeable future.

From the point of view of careerism, given the ALP monopoly over state administrations, they have far more patronage to dispense than the Federal Liberal Party. Apparatchiks follow the money into the ample bosom of the ALP.

Debnam in NSW does dumb things too – just this week he range the Deputy DPP to urge him to change his position on a paedophile case. It’s bad enought that he rang DDPP – standing for Lib pre-selection at the moment, but what was he thinking tell the media?

These people can’t organise themselves out of paper bags.

For these quaint fellas & gals (part-time reputation assassins)it’s all about ‘follow the money’…if the Kingmaker decides it’s in the interest of News Corp (Dynasty International)to support the incumbent…then the hive is set loose on the opposition…stings are lethal.

Unfortunately, this sets up a dilemma…is News Corp playing a game?…hoping that Flegg, like Israel of late, is considered hard done by & therefore deserves ‘underdog’ status?…or is Murdoch supporting the re-election of Beattie?…even more worrying.

I’d like to believe there’s some integrity to Courier Mail-based reporting & opine…but experience & many a disappointment has taught me otherwise. Perhaps I’m too cynical…?

Personally I’ve never minded Springborg in terms of his style. We’ve had worse from the Nats. I can’t say the same for his deputy, Geoff Seeney, who would be even less acceptable to city folk.

My elder brother, a Nat who lives in the country, keeps telling me that the city/country divide is getting worse. He could well be right.

Flegg certainly seems to have accumulated impressive wealth. The engine of his wealth is almost certainly his share in some of those all hours medical centres, now divested. Other than that he has real estate and some fairly safe shares. The companies he’s invested in that I read about, eg AMP and Suncorp, are not speculative or growth companies.

All this does little to convice that he is any more suitable than the next bloke, for example a teacher, a farmer or a lawyer, in understanding the needs of business.

Beattie still shapes as the best politician for business around, at least in this state.

At this stage of the campaign, the biggest threat to the ALP remains a protest vote. The leadership race has already been run, and won.

Agreed! While there is a ‘protest vote’ waiting to be cast, it has nowhere to go. At least, it has nowhere to go at this stage.

More worrying for the Liberals this weekend, I suspect, is the news that Doctor Flegg is in receipt of a ‘disability’ pension. While Flegg has refused to disclose the nature of this pension and the reasons for same, citing ‘personal’ matters, this rationale will not defuse the issue.

Doctor Flegg’s ‘disability pension’ will be a source of endless peculation. I suspect that the average punter resents multi-millionaires receiving government ‘disability’ pensions, particularly when that ‘disability’ is not apparent.

Also the fact that he owns $16 million dollar’s worth of shares in Cubby Station (a large contributor to the Murray-Darling environmental disaster, caused by using too much water for cotton production) will not endear him to the Greens.

Such revelations will ensure that Beattie’s ‘beam’ will almost match Quinn’s ‘grin’.