<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best blog posts update II: The challenge!</title>
	<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/</link>
	<description>Blogging politics, culture, sociology and life from Brisvegas</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Lambert</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-330744</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Lambert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 16:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-330744</guid>
		<description>The fun never ends &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2007/01/on_line_denial.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;with BBP06&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fun never ends <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2007/01/on_line_denial.php" rel="nofollow">with BBP06</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimT</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-330200</link>
		<dc:creator>TimT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 05:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-330200</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://willtypeforfood.blogspot.com/2007/01/worst-person-singular.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Trackback. &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://willtypeforfood.blogspot.com/2007/01/worst-person-singular.html" rel="nofollow">Trackback. </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PanelbeaterBird</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-330152</link>
		<dc:creator>PanelbeaterBird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 03:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-330152</guid>
		<description>"I think a lot of people have recognised that the process could be improved next year."

There cannot BE a next year for Ken and Nick.

They've blown it. They've shown they cannot be trusted. They had their chance and it turned out their leftism made it just that little bit to much to expect that they could run the competition in good faith.

It not room for improvement you are right of the planet here.

It was a sick fucking disgrace. Not an underperformance but a Marxist coup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I think a lot of people have recognised that the process could be improved next year.&#8221;</p>
<p>There cannot BE a next year for Ken and Nick.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve blown it. They&#8217;ve shown they cannot be trusted. They had their chance and it turned out their leftism made it just that little bit to much to expect that they could run the competition in good faith.</p>
<p>It not room for improvement you are right of the planet here.</p>
<p>It was a sick fucking disgrace. Not an underperformance but a Marxist coup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Kim</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-330059</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 01:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-330059</guid>
		<description>Certainly, Anna, m'dear!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly, Anna, m&#8217;dear!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Winter</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-329997</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Winter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 00:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-329997</guid>
		<description>Will youse Yanks get a room already?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will youse Yanks get a room already?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Kim</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-329917</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 22:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-329917</guid>
		<description>And that one post embodies why I adore my compatriot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that one post embodies why I adore my compatriot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j_p_z</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-329902</link>
		<dc:creator>j_p_z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 22:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-329902</guid>
		<description>"The Best Blog Posts of blibberdiblubb." Isn't it a little like saying, The best dactylic hexameters of Walt Whitman?  The best haiku of Keith Richards?  What we love is those democratic, barbaric yawps, that free-for-all; what Jon Anderson, who had no idea what he was talking about, called in one of his more inspired moments the "total mass retain." 

Isn't the best blog post one that asks a rather loaded question, and thus encourages a witty, informative, and contentious thread conversation?  So, Madame de Stael, what exactly did you say to make Talleyrand carry on like that?  And you, Sylvain Sylvain, what power chords did you play to get Johnny Thunders to shred like a madman?  Who asked Dorothy Parker to use the word 'horticulture' in a sentence?  Nobody remembers, but the reply is worth remembering.

Not to diminish any of the talented and committed writers who were nominated, but I read a random sampling of the various "Best Of" writings... While they were all perfectly good writing in their way, still, on their own, out of context and without the thread conversations they inspired, they mostly struck me as decent self-published essays of variable quality that had simply not found a home in the lap of a good editor and a good magazine.  Whatever else that might be on its own merits, it's not the genius of blogging.  I wouldn't dare to define what the genius of blogging might actually BE, however.  But in next year's go-round, that question might with profit find itself uppermost in the minds of those doing the judging.  If it does, then maybe the next crop of "best" will be more surprising and stimulating.

I do hope, however, that the crop of sour grapes that flourishes in response remains as marvelously bitchy and highly entertaining as we've seen to date.  On its own, it's already better blogging than any of the nominees.  Excelsior!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Best Blog Posts of blibberdiblubb.&#8221; Isn&#8217;t it a little like saying, The best dactylic hexameters of Walt Whitman?  The best haiku of Keith Richards?  What we love is those democratic, barbaric yawps, that free-for-all; what Jon Anderson, who had no idea what he was talking about, called in one of his more inspired moments the &#8220;total mass retain.&#8221; </p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t the best blog post one that asks a rather loaded question, and thus encourages a witty, informative, and contentious thread conversation?  So, Madame de Stael, what exactly did you say to make Talleyrand carry on like that?  And you, Sylvain Sylvain, what power chords did you play to get Johnny Thunders to shred like a madman?  Who asked Dorothy Parker to use the word &#8216;horticulture&#8217; in a sentence?  Nobody remembers, but the reply is worth remembering.</p>
<p>Not to diminish any of the talented and committed writers who were nominated, but I read a random sampling of the various &#8220;Best Of&#8221; writings&#8230; While they were all perfectly good writing in their way, still, on their own, out of context and without the thread conversations they inspired, they mostly struck me as decent self-published essays of variable quality that had simply not found a home in the lap of a good editor and a good magazine.  Whatever else that might be on its own merits, it&#8217;s not the genius of blogging.  I wouldn&#8217;t dare to define what the genius of blogging might actually BE, however.  But in next year&#8217;s go-round, that question might with profit find itself uppermost in the minds of those doing the judging.  If it does, then maybe the next crop of &#8220;best&#8221; will be more surprising and stimulating.</p>
<p>I do hope, however, that the crop of sour grapes that flourishes in response remains as marvelously bitchy and highly entertaining as we&#8217;ve seen to date.  On its own, it&#8217;s already better blogging than any of the nominees.  Excelsior!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skepticlawyer</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-329297</link>
		<dc:creator>skepticlawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 11:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-329297</guid>
		<description>Ours is up to 282 comments, PC. Add the two together and you've got a Thread of Doom!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ours is up to 282 comments, PC. Add the two together and you&#8217;ve got a Thread of Doom!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-329238</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 11:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-329238</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Rob, must have missed them. Some very long threads about this.

What made Sincs' contribution stick in my mind was that he went out of his way to nominate some posts he thought worthy of inclusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Rob, must have missed them. Some very long threads about this.</p>
<p>What made Sincs&#8217; contribution stick in my mind was that he went out of his way to nominate some posts he thought worthy of inclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-329216</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 10:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-329216</guid>
		<description>Hey, I offered lots of suggestions -- half-arsed, I daresay -- but Ken wasn't buying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I offered lots of suggestions &#8212; half-arsed, I daresay &#8212; but Ken wasn&#8217;t buying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-329162</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 10:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-329162</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I thought from the various debates that everyone recognised this process was flawed.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Glass half full, Rob.

I think a lot of people have recognised that the process could be improved next year. 

As Nabs and Kim said, kudos to those who worked hard to make it happen, and it'd be nice if people offered positive suggestions as to how to improve it rather than just knocking or whining. Some did - ie Sinclair Davidson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I thought from the various debates that everyone recognised this process was flawed.</p></blockquote>
<p>Glass half full, Rob.</p>
<p>I think a lot of people have recognised that the process could be improved next year. </p>
<p>As Nabs and Kim said, kudos to those who worked hard to make it happen, and it&#8217;d be nice if people offered positive suggestions as to how to improve it rather than just knocking or whining. Some did - ie Sinclair Davidson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pavlov's Cat</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-328978</link>
		<dc:creator>Pavlov's Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 08:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-328978</guid>
		<description>278th!

This thread could end up being a Missy if we maintain the rage.

&lt;blockquote&gt;A few of the posts are worth reading but most are tedious, self-indulgent bullshit from self-important lefty academics.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

As distinct from scintillating, intellectually rigorous rhetorical gems from shy and retiring righty autodidacts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>278th!</p>
<p>This thread could end up being a Missy if we maintain the rage.</p>
<blockquote><p>A few of the posts are worth reading but most are tedious, self-indulgent bullshit from self-important lefty academics.</p></blockquote>
<p>As distinct from scintillating, intellectually rigorous rhetorical gems from shy and retiring righty autodidacts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PanelbeaterBird</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-328890</link>
		<dc:creator>PanelbeaterBird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 07:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-328890</guid>
		<description>"A few of the posts are worth reading but most are tedious, self-indulgent bullshit from self-important lefty academics. If this is the best the blogosphere has to offer, it’s fucked."

But he's dead right. It was a disgrace. A scandal. 

I mean I'm just astounded by how bad it was. Tim Lambert for the love of dying black children everywhere Tim Lambert. How could all these lecturers get on in a fair fight.

This was a fucking leftist bully-boy circus. It was a marxists sick joke.

And I'm just so happy that I've now established that Skeptic didn't make any of the choices I was scandalised about and now I can blame this whole tawdry sad incident on Ken and Nick alone.

Ken showed his attitude right from the start when he deep-sixed my stuff.

Why oh why didn't he distance himself from this whole deal and give some time to build up some trust with the conservatives before closing off nominations.

As things turned out it looks like he tried to rig it and he's just made a total dick of himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A few of the posts are worth reading but most are tedious, self-indulgent bullshit from self-important lefty academics. If this is the best the blogosphere has to offer, it’s fucked.&#8221;</p>
<p>But he&#8217;s dead right. It was a disgrace. A scandal. </p>
<p>I mean I&#8217;m just astounded by how bad it was. Tim Lambert for the love of dying black children everywhere Tim Lambert. How could all these lecturers get on in a fair fight.</p>
<p>This was a fucking leftist bully-boy circus. It was a marxists sick joke.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m just so happy that I&#8217;ve now established that Skeptic didn&#8217;t make any of the choices I was scandalised about and now I can blame this whole tawdry sad incident on Ken and Nick alone.</p>
<p>Ken showed his attitude right from the start when he deep-sixed my stuff.</p>
<p>Why oh why didn&#8217;t he distance himself from this whole deal and give some time to build up some trust with the conservatives before closing off nominations.</p>
<p>As things turned out it looks like he tried to rig it and he&#8217;s just made a total dick of himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-328801</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 06:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-328801</guid>
		<description>That's a fair if opinionated call (but what did you expect? Buttercups?). As is "Some of the linked posts are indeed worth reading". 

I thought from the various debates that everyone recognised this process was flawed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a fair if opinionated call (but what did you expect? Buttercups?). As is &#8220;Some of the linked posts are indeed worth reading&#8221;. </p>
<p>I thought from the various debates that everyone recognised this process was flawed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-328768</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 06:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-328768</guid>
		<description>Huh, Rob?

This isn't "shitcanning"?

&lt;blockquote&gt;A few of the posts are worth reading but most are tedious, self-indulgent bullshit from self-important lefty academics. If this is the best the blogosphere has to offer, it's fucked.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh, Rob?</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t &#8220;shitcanning&#8221;?</p>
<blockquote><p>A few of the posts are worth reading but most are tedious, self-indulgent bullshit from self-important lefty academics. If this is the best the blogosphere has to offer, it&#8217;s fucked.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-328764</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 06:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-328764</guid>
		<description>Got to say again I'm with J F on this. He raised a number of eminently raise-able points on his blog about BB06 but did not shitcan it. Tim B took it up and it ran the extra mile or five -- well, that's the blogos. 

Good on you, J F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got to say again I&#8217;m with J F on this. He raised a number of eminently raise-able points on his blog about BB06 but did not shitcan it. Tim B took it up and it ran the extra mile or five &#8212; well, that&#8217;s the blogos. </p>
<p>Good on you, J F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PanelbeaterBird</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-328620</link>
		<dc:creator>PanelbeaterBird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 05:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-328620</guid>
		<description>I'm just beginning to realise that Kim is my ultimate interpreter.

Marvellous job. 

Actual quotes.

Parody's

Just brilliant.

It would save me time if I could just pay you to do all my internet stuff for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just beginning to realise that Kim is my ultimate interpreter.</p>
<p>Marvellous job. </p>
<p>Actual quotes.</p>
<p>Parody&#8217;s</p>
<p>Just brilliant.</p>
<p>It would save me time if I could just pay you to do all my internet stuff for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PanelbeaterBird</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-328582</link>
		<dc:creator>PanelbeaterBird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 04:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-328582</guid>
		<description>No its not for political reasons.

Its because Ken and Nick did a flagrantly pathetic job.

They screwed it up.

Ken. Just get someone else to do the job. You are not up to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No its not for political reasons.</p>
<p>Its because Ken and Nick did a flagrantly pathetic job.</p>
<p>They screwed it up.</p>
<p>Ken. Just get someone else to do the job. You are not up to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J F Beck</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-328579</link>
		<dc:creator>J F Beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 04:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-328579</guid>
		<description>"Shit attention" should be "shift attention." Must be some sort of Freudian slip thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Shit attention&#8221; should be &#8220;shift attention.&#8221; Must be some sort of Freudian slip thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PanelbeaterBird</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-328568</link>
		<dc:creator>PanelbeaterBird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 04:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/01/16/best-blog-posts-update-ii/#comment-328568</guid>
		<description>"Oh, come on guys. Birdy might be a bit over the top, but he’s an autodidact. Cut him some slack."

Careful with the BUTTMONKEY talk Soon.

Thats the killer.

And I stand by everything Kim posted and its all true and its unlikely that any or all of you put together could bring yet even a glancing blow to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, come on guys. Birdy might be a bit over the top, but he’s an autodidact. Cut him some slack.&#8221;</p>
<p>Careful with the BUTTMONKEY talk Soon.</p>
<p>Thats the killer.</p>
<p>And I stand by everything Kim posted and its all true and its unlikely that any or all of you put together could bring yet even a glancing blow to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
