<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sort-of clean coal in Victoria</title>
	<atom:link href="http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/</link>
	<description>Life, Culture and Politics from BrisVegas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:30:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wbb</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/#comment-197604</link>
		<dc:creator>wbb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/#comment-197604</guid>
		<description>Reality is, as Brian notes, we can&#039;t do w/out coal. Therefore we need coal to be as clean as we can get it. But, as Garrett knows, it&#039;s an interim measure and we need to get off coal in the medium run. But there are longish lead times until that is practically possible. Especially if like Garrett you believe nuclear is even worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reality is, as Brian notes, we can&#8217;t do w/out coal. Therefore we need coal to be as clean as we can get it. But, as Garrett knows, it&#8217;s an interim measure and we need to get off coal in the medium run. But there are longish lead times until that is practically possible. Especially if like Garrett you believe nuclear is even worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/#comment-197603</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/#comment-197603</guid>
		<description>I wonder how they propose to keep geosequestered C02 in the ground?  Its a gas.  If liquified or solidified it becomes a gas when it warms up again.  So they will squirt something down and it will just come back out over time.

Coal is non-renewable.  It cannot be made &quot;clean&quot;, not even by the ferocious industry and political spin.

Garrett on the 7:30 report last night said that &quot;clean coal is an important future enegy source&quot;, so Labor agrees with Howard, but for different reasons.

Howard is looking after the interests of coal exporters and companies that sell power made from burning coal.

Labor (Rudd &amp; Garrett) are seeking to neutalise Howard&#039;s clean coal push by agreeing with it and chiding him for not doing it sooner - and they aim to placate the coal mining unions who are agressively lobbying for clean coal too.

As Al Gore says, politics can&#039;t really deal with climate change - there is too much stupidity and too many vested interests.  We need real and concentrated community and grass roots pressure on this.

How about referendums on where to spend the $ - renewables, coal or nuclear?  I don&#039;t trust the windbags in Government (State and Federal) to do the right thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how they propose to keep geosequestered C02 in the ground?  Its a gas.  If liquified or solidified it becomes a gas when it warms up again.  So they will squirt something down and it will just come back out over time.</p>
<p>Coal is non-renewable.  It cannot be made &#8220;clean&#8221;, not even by the ferocious industry and political spin.</p>
<p>Garrett on the 7:30 report last night said that &#8220;clean coal is an important future enegy source&#8221;, so Labor agrees with Howard, but for different reasons.</p>
<p>Howard is looking after the interests of coal exporters and companies that sell power made from burning coal.</p>
<p>Labor (Rudd &amp; Garrett) are seeking to neutalise Howard&#8217;s clean coal push by agreeing with it and chiding him for not doing it sooner &#8211; and they aim to placate the coal mining unions who are agressively lobbying for clean coal too.</p>
<p>As Al Gore says, politics can&#8217;t really deal with climate change &#8211; there is too much stupidity and too many vested interests.  We need real and concentrated community and grass roots pressure on this.</p>
<p>How about referendums on where to spend the $ &#8211; renewables, coal or nuclear?  I don&#8217;t trust the windbags in Government (State and Federal) to do the right thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/#comment-197602</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/#comment-197602</guid>
		<description>With &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theoildrum.com/uploads/12/fossil_carbon_1850_2004.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;past usage like this&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/figure_48.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;future usage like this&lt;/a&gt; it is unrealistic to think that we won&#039;t have to clean up coal to a significant degree. So I&#039;m with &lt;a href=&quot;http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/#comment-353912&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;d derider&lt;/a&gt;. People like Al Gore and James Hansen would switch from optimism to pessimism if they thought that geosequestration was not possible.

On renewables, Prof Mark Diessendorf &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2007/s1871441.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;said today&lt;/a&gt; that:

&lt;blockquote&gt;promoters of fossil fuels and nuclear power are spreading the fallacy that renewable energy cannot provide baseload. But it&#039;s entirely untrue.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

He seems to have worked out how we can get from where we are to where we&#039;ve got to go. It would have been interesting if the interviewer had asked him to develop this theme further. The converation she didn&#039;t have with Rupert Posner of the Climate Group also would have been interesting.

&lt;a href=&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With <a href="http://www.theoildrum.com/uploads/12/fossil_carbon_1850_2004.jpg" rel="nofollow">past usage like this</a> and <a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/figure_48.html" rel="nofollow">future usage like this</a> it is unrealistic to think that we won&#8217;t have to clean up coal to a significant degree. So I&#8217;m with <a href="http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/#comment-353912" rel="nofollow">d derider</a>. People like Al Gore and James Hansen would switch from optimism to pessimism if they thought that geosequestration was not possible.</p>
<p>On renewables, Prof Mark Diessendorf <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2007/s1871441.htm" rel="nofollow">said today</a> that:</p>
<blockquote><p>promoters of fossil fuels and nuclear power are spreading the fallacy that renewable energy cannot provide baseload. But it&#8217;s entirely untrue.
</p></blockquote>
<p>He seems to have worked out how we can get from where we are to where we&#8217;ve got to go. It would have been interesting if the interviewer had asked him to develop this theme further. The converation she didn&#8217;t have with Rupert Posner of the Climate Group also would have been interesting.</p>
<p><a href="" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wbb</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/#comment-197601</link>
		<dc:creator>wbb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 05:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/#comment-197601</guid>
		<description>yeah - and I&#039;ve added Mt Millar to the list of Wind Farms which wasn&#039;t there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah &#8211; and I&#8217;ve added Mt Millar to the list of Wind Farms which wasn&#8217;t there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: observa</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/#comment-197600</link>
		<dc:creator>observa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 04:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/#comment-197600</guid>
		<description>Correction- Pelican Point had just added 485MW of fossil fuel generators to the system when Rann came to power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction- Pelican Point had just added 485MW of fossil fuel generators to the system when Rann came to power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: observa</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/#comment-197599</link>
		<dc:creator>observa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 04:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/#comment-197599</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the state of play in very windmilly SA at present and you might like to check your own state at the bottom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_power_stations_in_South_Australia

20% renewables in 7 years! Is it any wonder the Adelaide media just got stuck into Mr Pledge for running a V8 ministerial car fleet for chrissakes? That&#039;s the trouble with being a hypocritical bullshit artist, supporting V8 Supercar races and Holden V8 Camaro exports to the US. The same wanker is calling upon the Feds to halt the Car Plan tarriff reductions. What the hell is Rann going to do to Holdens or Mitsis power bills with enforcing 20% renewables I ask?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the state of play in very windmilly SA at present and you might like to check your own state at the bottom<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_power_stations_in_South_Australia" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_power_stations_in_South_Australia</a></p>
<p>20% renewables in 7 years! Is it any wonder the Adelaide media just got stuck into Mr Pledge for running a V8 ministerial car fleet for chrissakes? That&#8217;s the trouble with being a hypocritical bullshit artist, supporting V8 Supercar races and Holden V8 Camaro exports to the US. The same wanker is calling upon the Feds to halt the Car Plan tarriff reductions. What the hell is Rann going to do to Holdens or Mitsis power bills with enforcing 20% renewables I ask?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: observa</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/#comment-197598</link>
		<dc:creator>observa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 04:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/#comment-197598</guid>
		<description>Mr Pledge Rann can talk all he likes but as I pointed out at JQs this is the actual walk wbb-

Front page of Advertiser 6th March headline reads- â??2 NEW POWER PLANTS TO EASE STRESSâ?? and continues-
â??Two new power stations worth $870 mill are being planned for SA in a move that could ease strain on the stateâ??s electricity network.
Corporate firms Babcock and Brown and NP Power will this month apply to the Development assessment Commission to build a 450MW gas fired peaking power station at Redbanks near Mallala.
The project estimated to cost $350 mill has been endorsed by the State Govt as a â??public infrastructure developmentâ?? under section 49 of the Development Act.
A separate 560MW power station valued at $520 milloion, has been foreshadowed as part of Altona Resources $3.9 billion proposal to produce petroleum and gas in the stateâ??s Far North.
If approved, the new power stations would be among the stateâ??s 5 biggest generators.â??

And all this when he came to power and inherited the brand new Pelican Point gas fired power station adding nearly 800MW to the grid. When the hell does all the easy talking stop and the hard walking begin wbb? 20% renewables in 7 years, my arse!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Pledge Rann can talk all he likes but as I pointed out at JQs this is the actual walk wbb-</p>
<p>Front page of Advertiser 6th March headline reads- â??2 NEW POWER PLANTS TO EASE STRESSâ?? and continues-<br />
â??Two new power stations worth $870 mill are being planned for SA in a move that could ease strain on the stateâ??s electricity network.<br />
Corporate firms Babcock and Brown and NP Power will this month apply to the Development assessment Commission to build a 450MW gas fired peaking power station at Redbanks near Mallala.<br />
The project estimated to cost $350 mill has been endorsed by the State Govt as a â??public infrastructure developmentâ?? under section 49 of the Development Act.<br />
A separate 560MW power station valued at $520 milloion, has been foreshadowed as part of Altona Resources $3.9 billion proposal to produce petroleum and gas in the stateâ??s Far North.<br />
If approved, the new power stations would be among the stateâ??s 5 biggest generators.â??</p>
<p>And all this when he came to power and inherited the brand new Pelican Point gas fired power station adding nearly 800MW to the grid. When the hell does all the easy talking stop and the hard walking begin wbb? 20% renewables in 7 years, my arse!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lefty E</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/#comment-197597</link>
		<dc:creator>Lefty E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 03:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/#comment-197597</guid>
		<description>Good couple of posts Robert - very informative.

I cant help thinking of the &#039;efficiency&#039; drives that presage the demise of all doomed &amp; outdated technologies; but on balance, its seems a unobjectionable interim measure.

I dont know enough about it - but it strikes me we need a full, informed debate on the renewable &quot;baseload capacity&quot; question. People like Howard and Keating&#039;s former finance Minsiter Peter Whatsisname gasbag assertively and dismissively about renewable capacity - yet major economies like California reckon its a goer, and are pinching our scientists to enable it.

I dont think we should bother with any &#039;nuclear debate&#039; till weve had that one out.

And yes, brown coal should be a prohibited substance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good couple of posts Robert &#8211; very informative.</p>
<p>I cant help thinking of the &#8216;efficiency&#8217; drives that presage the demise of all doomed &amp; outdated technologies; but on balance, its seems a unobjectionable interim measure.</p>
<p>I dont know enough about it &#8211; but it strikes me we need a full, informed debate on the renewable &#8220;baseload capacity&#8221; question. People like Howard and Keating&#8217;s former finance Minsiter Peter Whatsisname gasbag assertively and dismissively about renewable capacity &#8211; yet major economies like California reckon its a goer, and are pinching our scientists to enable it.</p>
<p>I dont think we should bother with any &#8216;nuclear debate&#8217; till weve had that one out.</p>
<p>And yes, brown coal should be a prohibited substance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wbb</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/#comment-197596</link>
		<dc:creator>wbb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 02:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/#comment-197596</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Show me the cities like Adelaide that currently run anywhere near 50% renewables, or 30 or 20%.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

We won&#039;t need to show you anything, Observa. You&#039;ll be showing us.

It is the stated policy of your government that South Australia run 20% renewables 7 years from now.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stateplan.sa.gov.au/plan_targets_obj3.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Show me the cities like Adelaide that currently run anywhere near 50% renewables, or 30 or 20%.</p></blockquote>
<p>We won&#8217;t need to show you anything, Observa. You&#8217;ll be showing us.</p>
<p>It is the stated policy of your government that South Australia run 20% renewables 7 years from now.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stateplan.sa.gov.au/plan_targets_obj3.php" rel="nofollow">[link]</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: observa</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/#comment-197595</link>
		<dc:creator>observa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 01:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/03/13/sort-of-clean-coal-in-victoria/#comment-197595</guid>
		<description>wbb,
You are right about SA and wind power but it is currently under 1% of our power. Geothermal is still pie in the sky, or stuck in the mud, although it may be promising. However cracking the earth&#039;s crust deliberately and forcing water down there may be more problematic than we think, if experience is any guide. Certainly tapping natural geothermal in NZ has seen a rapid decline in thermal activity near the surface and they have Lake Taupo(as I recall) to feed the whole natural enterprise. Most of proposed Oz sites don&#039;t have anywhere near that water.

Show me the cities like Adelaide that currently run anywhere near 50% renewables, or 30 or 20%. I repeat, the sun doesn&#039;t shine at night and the lights don&#039;t glow when the wind don&#039;t blow. Consumers will not freeze or swelter in the dark and that&#039;s why Mr Pledge, Mike Rann is approving 2 new, additional gas fired power plants in SA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wbb,<br />
You are right about SA and wind power but it is currently under 1% of our power. Geothermal is still pie in the sky, or stuck in the mud, although it may be promising. However cracking the earth&#8217;s crust deliberately and forcing water down there may be more problematic than we think, if experience is any guide. Certainly tapping natural geothermal in NZ has seen a rapid decline in thermal activity near the surface and they have Lake Taupo(as I recall) to feed the whole natural enterprise. Most of proposed Oz sites don&#8217;t have anywhere near that water.</p>
<p>Show me the cities like Adelaide that currently run anywhere near 50% renewables, or 30 or 20%. I repeat, the sun doesn&#8217;t shine at night and the lights don&#8217;t glow when the wind don&#8217;t blow. Consumers will not freeze or swelter in the dark and that&#8217;s why Mr Pledge, Mike Rann is approving 2 new, additional gas fired power plants in SA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

