“Members of Congress need to stop making political statements”

You’d almost start to believe the rumours that Dubya is back on the Bourbon in a big way, and that Laura Bush is spending her nights in a Washington hotel to avoid her hubby. I’m kinda not kidding, because if you read anything about the last days of Tricky Dick Nixon, the Man was tripped out on all sorts of pills washed down with good old Kentucky whiskey, and apparently ranting and raving constantly at the portraits of JFK and LBJ on the ground floor of the White House (Nixon’s attempt to rebrand himself as RN never really caught on…). General Haig, otherwise known for his “I’m in charge” moment after the assassination attempt on Reagan, explicitly issued orders down the military chain of command that nothing the President decided was to be obeyed without the counter-signatures of the Secretaries of State and Defense and the Chief of Staff. Kissinger got drunken phone calls at 2am telling him to nuke Moscow. Now, Bush being back on the grog might just be a rumour. But rationality has never been his strong point. Compare for yourself – objectively – the vid over the fold shows the Decider-in-Chief and Speaker Nancy Pelosi both discussing the supplementary appropriations bill.

Update: John Amato has tracked down the bloggers Bush quoted from in the vid.

Share this...
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • e-mail

11 Responses to ““Members of Congress need to stop making political statements””


  1. 1 Enemy CombatantNo Gravatar

    “Members of Congress need to stop making political statements�

    Such Utterances underline why some refer to Dubya as The Imbecile.

  2. 2 ShaunNo Gravatar

    I get it. Republicans playing politics is ok but heaven forbid if the Democrats to the same.

    Speaking of Iraq, Micheal Ware’s take down of John McCain’s panglossian visions was beautiful.
    http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/03/27/michael-ware-i-dont-know-what-part-of-neverland-senator-mccain-is-talking-about/

  3. 3 comicstripheroNo Gravatar

    Kinda reinforces the “this is not a monarchy” theme noted in an earlier post.

    Article 1 of the constitution is about the congress after all.

  4. 4 BrendonNo Gravatar

    If the problem was just Bush it would be a lot simpler.

    When the Soviets and America went into a strategic arms race, the belligerence of both sides politicians didn’t seem so out of place.

    Since the Soviet collapse, American politics has not accomodated the changing situation. Maybe it needed the strident militaristic attitude against a rival superpower. But that isn’t the case today.

    The belligerent, warmongering politicians in America today are no different to what they were 25 years ago. Except now, there is no strategic imperative to hold them back.

    That is why Bush sounds so much more creepy and menacing.

    Since GWB, America today speaks loudly… and its stick isn’t all that big from what we have seen in Iraq.

    But after secret drinker Bush, we have the warmongers Clinton, McCain, Giuliani…etc.

  5. 5 KimNo Gravatar

    Update: John Amato has tracked down the bloggers Bush quoted from in the vid.

  6. 6 comicstripheroNo Gravatar

    Hope this isn’t too off-topic – but in the footsteps of Reagan…

  7. 7 GoAwayPleaseNo Gravatar

    If Laura wanted avoid Bush43, she would have plenty of large private discreet Republican friend’s homes to be in, instead of a public hotel.

  8. 8 GoAwayPleaseNo Gravatar

    in the footsteps of reagan and schwarzenegger ….comicStrips link to

    “Thompson is “seriously considering” a presidential campaign at the urging of many friends. “He has a commanding television presence that makes every other politician in America jealous.”
    … tells us that we just need a really good actor, as in “I’m not young but I can play young.

    Since Thompson is republican, maybe Martin Sheen could stand against him.
    Pollies are all puppets for their spin docs and speechwriters anyhow.

    *going off chanting*
    “Maggie Tabberer for PM of a stylish family oriented Australia!”

  9. 9 mickNo Gravatar

    I want some of what he’s taking.

  10. 10 Graham BellNo Gravatar

    Brendon:
    Part of the problem is the the American political system is so dependent on having the one big bad Enemy …. a hangover from so many of America’s founders influenced by the horrific Thirty Years War perhaps?

    Kim:
    Far more worrying is the decision by The King of Saudi Arabia to not dine with the World’s Biggest Born Loser. Quite a tectonic plate shift there!!!!

    [Thanks for mentioning General Haig, who like President Ford, was far more influential than is usually supposed].

  11. 11 NahumNo Gravatar

    Brendon:
    Part of the problem is the the American political system is so dependent on having the one big bad Enemy …. a hangover from so many of America’s founders influenced by the horrific Thirty Years War perhaps?

    What he said, but the Iraqi problem is diversionary politics. There are serious domestic problems in the US. It is an economic basket case, spending far more than they take in revenue, with household debt at record levels. The only way the US can afford to continue in it’s shambolic economic state is to issue bonds to China and print more money.

    The US economy is completely f*cked. If you want a case study in economic mismanagement of epic proportions, then just look to the US. If the economy wasn’t as large as it is, they would have gone the way of the Solomon Islands a long time ago. The only thing standing between the US and a correction of Titanic proportions is that such a correction would plunge the world economies into recession.

    China would lose a market for it’s goods and the world would tumble. China need only dump some of its bonds back on the US economy and US interest rates would escalate substantially. Forclosures would be rife. China doesn’t need to worry about taking over the US, in another five years it will own the country.

    So, that’s the reason the US needs war. Without such a diversion, the Commander in Chief might have to take some tough decisions on the economy. And I’m not talking about more f*cking tax cuts.

Leave a Reply

Please read the comments policy. If you would like an icon beside your comment, please register a Gravatar.

There is a Comments Preview function below the typing box which activates when you start typing.

Allowed tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Examples:

<strong>Strong</strong>= Strong
<em>Emphasized</em> = Emphasized
<a href="http://www.url.com">Linked text</a>= Linked text
<blockquote>Quoted Text</blockquote>