New Scientist’s guide for the perplexed on climate change

The title sums it up. The New Scientist blog has a list of 26 climate change myths and a guide to assessing the evidence. The articles include lots of links to primary research and major reports for those who want to follow through to the original sources.

Share this... These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • e-mail

7 Responses to “New Scientist’s guide for the perplexed on climate change”


  1. 1 BrianNo Gravatar

    Thanks, suz, it’s a very useful resource.

  2. 2 Graham BellNo Gravatar

    Suz:
    And I’ll second Brian’s motion. Very handy,

  3. 3 Lefty ENo Gravatar

    Political pressure at the ABC from Howard’s climate denial squad.

    http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/interference-claim-at-abc/2007/05/23/1179601487356.html

  4. 4 BrianNo Gravatar

    The program [The Great Global Warming Swindle to be broadcast in July] caused a storm when it was aired on Britain’s Channel 4 in March, with accusations by scientists — including some of those featured in the film — that its makers used fabricated data, half-truths and misleading statements.

    ABC science journalist and broadcaster Robyn Williams, who advised the TV division not to buy the program, yesterday accused the broadcaster of “verging on the irresponsible” over its decision to air something that was “demonstrably wrong”.

    Mr Williams said that ABC TV director Kim Dalton had intimated in a conversation last month that he was under pressure about the issue from the board, which includes right-wing commentators Janet Albrechtsen and Keith Windschuttle.

    Scandalous, really.

  5. 5 djNo Gravatar

    Why not run the program and then take the time to go through all the things it got wrong.

    That should only take up the next 24 hours or so of broadcast time…

  6. 6 tigtogNo Gravatar

    I heard Robyn Williams on the radio this morning and he was pointing out that this following on the heels of rubbish like “Psychic Detectives” (and something else I can’t remember) that the ABC showed recently, seems to him like a deliberate ploy to show credulous rubbish on Auntie so that she becomes devalued as a trustworthy source of information.

  7. 7 adrianNo Gravatar

    seems to him like a deliberate ploy to show credulous rubbish on Auntie so that she becomes devalued as a trustworthy source of information.

    ‘Her’ own news services and political correspondents seem to be doing a very good job of this all by themselves.

Leave a Reply

Please read the comments policy. If you would like an icon beside your comment, please register a Gravatar.

There is a Comments Preview function below the typing box which activates when you start typing.

Allowed tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Examples:

<strong>Strong</strong>= Strong
<em>Emphasized</em> = Emphasized
<a href="http://www.url.com">Linked text</a>= Linked text
<blockquote>Quoted Text</blockquote>