<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Government: drought Rudd&#8217;s fault!</title>
	<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/</link>
	<description>Blogging politics, culture, sociology and life from Brisvegas</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-370212</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 10:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-370212</guid>
		<description>Now the &lt;a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200705/s1931438.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;Libs can't even give money away&lt;/a&gt;.  Brough is now in the position of having two strikes against him,with the disability agreement unsigned and now Alice Springs Indigenous communities don't like his latest deal either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now the <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200705/s1931438.htm" rel="nofollow">Libs can&#8217;t even give money away</a>.  Brough is now in the position of having two strikes against him,with the disability agreement unsigned and now Alice Springs Indigenous communities don&#8217;t like his latest deal either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369788</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 12:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369788</guid>
		<description>Very interesting. Thanks for the links, Steve and Dave.

Peter Martin links to &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Government_Pension_Fund_of_Norway" rel="nofollow"&gt;Norway's Government Pension Fund&lt;/a&gt; where they invest the excess oil revenue. It currently stands at US$292.5 billion growing to $500b by 2009.

Not bad for a country of 4.6 million. The whole country should be able to give up work and go on holidays any day soon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting. Thanks for the links, Steve and Dave.</p>
<p>Peter Martin links to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Government_Pension_Fund_of_Norway" rel="nofollow">Norway&#8217;s Government Pension Fund</a> where they invest the excess oil revenue. It currently stands at US$292.5 billion growing to $500b by 2009.</p>
<p>Not bad for a country of 4.6 million. The whole country should be able to give up work and go on holidays any day soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Bath</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369587</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Bath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 04:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369587</guid>
		<description>Steve - thanks for the reference my Econometrics table that  shows the lie of Howard/Costello economics management. Interestingly, the figures in the post  seems to have scared all the usual right-wing commenters away.

BTW: The table is at the bottom of the (long) article, and you can get directly to the table without  lots of paging down with  &lt;a href="http://www.deadroo.com/index.php/econometrics-101#bonustable" rel="nofollow"&gt;this link&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve - thanks for the reference my Econometrics table that  shows the lie of Howard/Costello economics management. Interestingly, the figures in the post  seems to have scared all the usual right-wing commenters away.</p>
<p>BTW: The table is at the bottom of the (long) article, and you can get directly to the table without  lots of paging down with  <a href="http://www.deadroo.com/index.php/econometrics-101#bonustable" rel="nofollow">this link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369569</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 03:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369569</guid>
		<description>Check out this con too. &lt;a href="http://petermartin.blogspot.com/2007/05/tuesday-column-future-fund-is-con.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Peter Martin &lt;/a&gt;is not a fan of the future fund.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out this con too. <a href="http://petermartin.blogspot.com/2007/05/tuesday-column-future-fund-is-con.html" rel="nofollow">Peter Martin </a>is not a fan of the future fund.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369473</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 23:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369473</guid>
		<description>Brian, &lt;a href="http://www.deadroo.com/index.php/econometrics-101/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Dead Roo &lt;/a&gt;had a chart similar to your concept comparing  economies of Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Australia and the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, <a href="http://www.deadroo.com/index.php/econometrics-101/" rel="nofollow">Dead Roo </a>had a chart similar to your concept comparing  economies of Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Australia and the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369448</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 23:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369448</guid>
		<description>Speaking of the ads, has anyone else noticed the common branding that seems to be occuring? The &lt;strike&gt;WorkChoices&lt;/strike&gt;Workplace relations; private health insurance and superannuation changes advertisments are all using the same plain fonts and mid-blue (conviently Liberal-party-esq) colour for the 'text' parts of the ads. 

Its quite weird. They all match.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of the ads, has anyone else noticed the common branding that seems to be occuring? The <strike>WorkChoices</strike>Workplace relations; private health insurance and superannuation changes advertisments are all using the same plain fonts and mid-blue (conviently Liberal-party-esq) colour for the &#8216;text&#8217; parts of the ads. </p>
<p>Its quite weird. They all match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Wigan</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369441</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Wigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 23:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369441</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Propitiatory sacrifice of the biggest offender is probably the best option.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Best explanation I've heard yet, Dave Bath.  Now I get it, with all those ancient sacrifices of high priests.  Time to apply the blowtorch to Ratty. If it worked before it may work again.

Pablo, yeah I noticed that unsuppressible smile (almost a loud laugh) as the PM explained how perfectly banal and non-political all those ads on New WorkChoices were. 

Took me back to Clarke and Dawe doing an i/v with ex-Defence Minister Reith explaining between howls of laughter how Reith (though not now a Minister) had just done the supervisory report for the Defence Permanent Head's bonus issue payment, almost concurrently with the Head doing a report clearing Reith of any impropriety (more gales of laughter from interviewer and interviewee).

Life does seem to be imitating art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Propitiatory sacrifice of the biggest offender is probably the best option.</p></blockquote>
<p>Best explanation I&#8217;ve heard yet, Dave Bath.  Now I get it, with all those ancient sacrifices of high priests.  Time to apply the blowtorch to Ratty. If it worked before it may work again.</p>
<p>Pablo, yeah I noticed that unsuppressible smile (almost a loud laugh) as the PM explained how perfectly banal and non-political all those ads on New WorkChoices were. </p>
<p>Took me back to Clarke and Dawe doing an i/v with ex-Defence Minister Reith explaining between howls of laughter how Reith (though not now a Minister) had just done the supervisory report for the Defence Permanent Head&#8217;s bonus issue payment, almost concurrently with the Head doing a report clearing Reith of any impropriety (more gales of laughter from interviewer and interviewee).</p>
<p>Life does seem to be imitating art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MorningDude</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369434</link>
		<dc:creator>MorningDude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 22:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369434</guid>
		<description>Chris Uhlmann, ABC poliitcal commentator, has just stated on Radio National to standby for a government advertising blitz the likes of which has never been seen here. He said you will not be able to open a newspaper, magazine or watch commercial TV at any time without seeing government advertising of one sort or another.

Shit, please no, I'm already jack of the current round of government ads on TV, and have more than once seriously thought of damaging my set with anything that is close to hand, but the promise is even changing channels will not get you away from tax payer funded party political propaganda.

I hated it when Keating did it and hate it even more now, especially since in Howard's 1996 election campaign he promised to get rid of it once and for all but has just raised it to a whole new stratospheric level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Uhlmann, ABC poliitcal commentator, has just stated on Radio National to standby for a government advertising blitz the likes of which has never been seen here. He said you will not be able to open a newspaper, magazine or watch commercial TV at any time without seeing government advertising of one sort or another.</p>
<p>Shit, please no, I&#8217;m already jack of the current round of government ads on TV, and have more than once seriously thought of damaging my set with anything that is close to hand, but the promise is even changing channels will not get you away from tax payer funded party political propaganda.</p>
<p>I hated it when Keating did it and hate it even more now, especially since in Howard&#8217;s 1996 election campaign he promised to get rid of it once and for all but has just raised it to a whole new stratospheric level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St Margaret</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369302</link>
		<dc:creator>St Margaret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 14:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369302</guid>
		<description>'Cossie talks about setting things up for the future...'.  But how do you talk to the average punter about setting things up for the future Brian?  No-one seems to be listening except people who actually read economics news and they are few.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Cossie talks about setting things up for the future&#8230;&#8217;.  But how do you talk to the average punter about setting things up for the future Brian?  No-one seems to be listening except people who actually read economics news and they are few.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369293</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 14:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369293</guid>
		<description>St Margaret, I'm recalling stuff I heard on Radio National about the resources boom. The comparison was with Norway and Britain.

Norway I understand controlled the exploitation of oil by the state and had a policy of investing any profits in the currency in which they were earned. So nothing was used directly on current expenditure, only the subsequent fund earnings. Something like what Cossie is doing for universities, only more so.

I think the Brits also had a national authority which arranged for private enterprise to do the work. But like us they've pissed the profits up the wall.

We've just opened it up to private enterprise, with rake-offs through royalties, company tax, tax from the employees, the service industries, the halo effect etc. And it's created some infrastructure.

But you could argue that the resultant higher dollar and higher wages causing skill shortages elsewhere has stuffed our manufacturing, employing about a million people, as well as stuffing our farming and a fair bit else besides.

In recent years the money has been just rolling in. Cossie talks about setting things up for the future, but it's a con to cover his vote-buying and middle-class welfare.

There is absolutely no rationale to his universities fund, it's just plucked out of the air.

Swan has been talking non-stop about setting us up for when the resources boom is over (actually the Beazer did too) so maybe something will get through to the meeja and the voters.

Any passing economists, please set me straight about the above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>St Margaret, I&#8217;m recalling stuff I heard on Radio National about the resources boom. The comparison was with Norway and Britain.</p>
<p>Norway I understand controlled the exploitation of oil by the state and had a policy of investing any profits in the currency in which they were earned. So nothing was used directly on current expenditure, only the subsequent fund earnings. Something like what Cossie is doing for universities, only more so.</p>
<p>I think the Brits also had a national authority which arranged for private enterprise to do the work. But like us they&#8217;ve pissed the profits up the wall.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve just opened it up to private enterprise, with rake-offs through royalties, company tax, tax from the employees, the service industries, the halo effect etc. And it&#8217;s created some infrastructure.</p>
<p>But you could argue that the resultant higher dollar and higher wages causing skill shortages elsewhere has stuffed our manufacturing, employing about a million people, as well as stuffing our farming and a fair bit else besides.</p>
<p>In recent years the money has been just rolling in. Cossie talks about setting things up for the future, but it&#8217;s a con to cover his vote-buying and middle-class welfare.</p>
<p>There is absolutely no rationale to his universities fund, it&#8217;s just plucked out of the air.</p>
<p>Swan has been talking non-stop about setting us up for when the resources boom is over (actually the Beazer did too) so maybe something will get through to the meeja and the voters.</p>
<p>Any passing economists, please set me straight about the above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pablo</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369275</link>
		<dc:creator>pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 13:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369275</guid>
		<description>Howard's political advertising bent is beginning to unravel, judging by the rodent being unable to keep a straight face in parliamentary question time when tackled on the issue. 
In a very telling response, Howard showed all may be lost with a reply that the new ads were,  of course, all about information (smile) and any insinuations (bigger smile) that they were political (still smiling) was quite to the contrary.
For a guy with plenty of chutzpah and discipline in front of a tv camera this was a damaging public performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard&#8217;s political advertising bent is beginning to unravel, judging by the rodent being unable to keep a straight face in parliamentary question time when tackled on the issue.<br />
In a very telling response, Howard showed all may be lost with a reply that the new ads were,  of course, all about information (smile) and any insinuations (bigger smile) that they were political (still smiling) was quite to the contrary.<br />
For a guy with plenty of chutzpah and discipline in front of a tv camera this was a damaging public performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St Margaret</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369266</link>
		<dc:creator>St Margaret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 13:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369266</guid>
		<description>Actually I thought it was just managing the economy as a whole, by the sheer non effort of riding and presiding over the resources boom the way he has rather than the fistfuls of cash he has been flinging at people around election times that people think Ratty is so great at running the economy.  But I have seen economics articles refuting just how good Ratty isn't (can't think where now) with points that we aren't even making as much money out of the resources boom that we should so maybe Labor can attack this kind of stereotype effectively.  

On the other hand, people may be sick to death of Ratty but when it comes to the point the economic outlook is so seemingly rosy that they may very well just plump for Ratty again.  Depressing thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I thought it was just managing the economy as a whole, by the sheer non effort of riding and presiding over the resources boom the way he has rather than the fistfuls of cash he has been flinging at people around election times that people think Ratty is so great at running the economy.  But I have seen economics articles refuting just how good Ratty isn&#8217;t (can&#8217;t think where now) with points that we aren&#8217;t even making as much money out of the resources boom that we should so maybe Labor can attack this kind of stereotype effectively.  </p>
<p>On the other hand, people may be sick to death of Ratty but when it comes to the point the economic outlook is so seemingly rosy that they may very well just plump for Ratty again.  Depressing thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen Cluse</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369265</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen Cluse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 13:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369265</guid>
		<description>Guido,
(on Milne's:. . . 
Because while the electorate continues to flirt with Rudd they recognise the Government’s achievements and its superiority on the core issue of managing the economy.
. . . and your . . I hope to heaven that Labor gets in just to knock that myth out of the water!)

That ain't myth, Guido, that's pure spin.

Tory/Nats have reduced the Federal debt, and built budget surpluses, by not spending on the infrastructure that the country needs just to stand still, let alone grow. They sock it away for their retirement - whoops, pardon moi - Future Fund, et al. I shan't mention their GST revenue windfall. At least half of the Democrat senators fought against that morsel.

We currently have one of the highest interest rates in the world. It's the comparison with the rest of the world that is important, not what the rates were here, back when Howard was treasurer. (Or should that be Keating? No. Interest rates were lower then, relatively, I'm sure. Wink wink.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guido,<br />
(on Milne&#8217;s:. . .<br />
Because while the electorate continues to flirt with Rudd they recognise the Government’s achievements and its superiority on the core issue of managing the economy.<br />
. . . and your . . I hope to heaven that Labor gets in just to knock that myth out of the water!)</p>
<p>That ain&#8217;t myth, Guido, that&#8217;s pure spin.</p>
<p>Tory/Nats have reduced the Federal debt, and built budget surpluses, by not spending on the infrastructure that the country needs just to stand still, let alone grow. They sock it away for their retirement - whoops, pardon moi - Future Fund, et al. I shan&#8217;t mention their GST revenue windfall. At least half of the Democrat senators fought against that morsel.</p>
<p>We currently have one of the highest interest rates in the world. It&#8217;s the comparison with the rest of the world that is important, not what the rates were here, back when Howard was treasurer. (Or should that be Keating? No. Interest rates were lower then, relatively, I&#8217;m sure. Wink wink.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369239</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 12:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369239</guid>
		<description>Just on the point of an increase in the First Homebuyers scam, I did see where urgers in the Queensland Real Estate Industry were prompting Howard to increase the scam to $50 000.  This is an area where Howard also has previous form and a jump would not be the surprise to the Opposition that it was the last time he did this in an election campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just on the point of an increase in the First Homebuyers scam, I did see where urgers in the Queensland Real Estate Industry were prompting Howard to increase the scam to $50 000.  This is an area where Howard also has previous form and a jump would not be the surprise to the Opposition that it was the last time he did this in an election campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369230</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 11:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369230</guid>
		<description>Can't quite grasp which bit of Howard's mangled economic credentials are going to be enough to give him enough momentum, St Margaret, although on past form he has tried variations of the most below at differing times in his career.

Tax Cuts from the budget. - Unlikely, big petrol price rises are upon us and the tax cuts will all be eroded before they arrive.

A one off big rise in the first home mortgage Scam - Possibility but houses quickly rise by the amount of carrot and then some.

Cutting red tape to business  - will be laughed at after all the thousands of pages of GST and Workchoices he has clogged up the tax and industrial relations areas with over the past decade.

Twisting the arm of the Reserve Bank to cut Interest Rates - Possible because even the 'independent' Reserve Bank Board are all appointed by the Federal Government. would be breathtaking hypocrisy.

Offer a huge and off budget 'Fistful of Dollars' taxcut to everyone.  A bribe with a catch that Howard has form on this one from when he was Treasurer in the Fraser Government.  Although it was advertised on TV and billboards all major newspaper full page ads in every major city newspaper, was declared noncore and too expensive after he won the election.  Don't think he would get away with that one again.

Abolish business taxes  -  possibility but would feed into the anti workchoices script and opinion polling</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t quite grasp which bit of Howard&#8217;s mangled economic credentials are going to be enough to give him enough momentum, St Margaret, although on past form he has tried variations of the most below at differing times in his career.</p>
<p>Tax Cuts from the budget. - Unlikely, big petrol price rises are upon us and the tax cuts will all be eroded before they arrive.</p>
<p>A one off big rise in the first home mortgage Scam - Possibility but houses quickly rise by the amount of carrot and then some.</p>
<p>Cutting red tape to business  - will be laughed at after all the thousands of pages of GST and Workchoices he has clogged up the tax and industrial relations areas with over the past decade.</p>
<p>Twisting the arm of the Reserve Bank to cut Interest Rates - Possible because even the &#8216;independent&#8217; Reserve Bank Board are all appointed by the Federal Government. would be breathtaking hypocrisy.</p>
<p>Offer a huge and off budget &#8216;Fistful of Dollars&#8217; taxcut to everyone.  A bribe with a catch that Howard has form on this one from when he was Treasurer in the Fraser Government.  Although it was advertised on TV and billboards all major newspaper full page ads in every major city newspaper, was declared noncore and too expensive after he won the election.  Don&#8217;t think he would get away with that one again.</p>
<p>Abolish business taxes  -  possibility but would feed into the anti workchoices script and opinion polling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe2</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369203</link>
		<dc:creator>joe2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 10:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369203</guid>
		<description>Yep, St Margaret but it is, another issue. I am suggesting that no one should underestimate the rodent in a cage. The body politic is now well nawed. 

Anyone, who imagines Howard is not looking to the Pervez Musharraf' bat are not watching the ball.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, St Margaret but it is, another issue. I am suggesting that no one should underestimate the rodent in a cage. The body politic is now well nawed. </p>
<p>Anyone, who imagines Howard is not looking to the Pervez Musharraf&#8217; bat are not watching the ball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St Margaret</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369179</link>
		<dc:creator>St Margaret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 09:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369179</guid>
		<description>I agree with Guido - the biggest problem Labor has is the evident public perception  that Ratty &#38; Co. are much better at managing the economy than they are.  This may be wrong but it's bloody well out there and every Ratty-hugging commentator is clinging to it and &lt;a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21764229-7583,00.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;declaiming&lt;/a&gt; from it.  

Rudd and Labor seems to be already out there and working on it, but surely the economy thing is going to be Ratty's biggest game plan.  The L-plate thing is just a sideshow.  However I wonder if people are thinking that they are not going to vote for him despite how well he seems to manage the economy.  If so, then this coming election result is going to break all the rules - wouldn't that be great!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Guido - the biggest problem Labor has is the evident public perception  that Ratty &amp; Co. are much better at managing the economy than they are.  This may be wrong but it&#8217;s bloody well out there and every Ratty-hugging commentator is clinging to it and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21764229-7583,00.html" rel="nofollow">declaiming</a> from it.  </p>
<p>Rudd and Labor seems to be already out there and working on it, but surely the economy thing is going to be Ratty&#8217;s biggest game plan.  The L-plate thing is just a sideshow.  However I wonder if people are thinking that they are not going to vote for him despite how well he seems to manage the economy.  If so, then this coming election result is going to break all the rules - wouldn&#8217;t that be great!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe2</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369175</link>
		<dc:creator>joe2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 08:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369175</guid>
		<description>Surely Laura Norder is the wildcard to walk on water, as an the election winning issue.

Think APEC, Sept 6-9th with threats from here to there.
Meedja in a frenzy and cut to free ads of our heroic PM.

A quick election and democracy overboard again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely Laura Norder is the wildcard to walk on water, as an the election winning issue.</p>
<p>Think APEC, Sept 6-9th with threats from here to there.<br />
Meedja in a frenzy and cut to free ads of our heroic PM.</p>
<p>A quick election and democracy overboard again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guido</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369148</link>
		<dc:creator>Guido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 07:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369148</guid>
		<description>Milne:


&lt;blockquote&gt;Because while the electorate continues to flirt with Rudd they recognise the Government's achievements and its superiority on the core issue of managing the economy.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I hope to heaven that Labor gets in just to knock that myth out of the water!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Milne:</p>
<blockquote><p>Because while the electorate continues to flirt with Rudd they recognise the Government&#8217;s achievements and its superiority on the core issue of managing the economy.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I hope to heaven that Labor gets in just to knock that myth out of the water!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QLD_Voter</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369141</link>
		<dc:creator>QLD_Voter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 07:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/05/21/government-drought-rudds-fault/#comment-369141</guid>
		<description>Mark, 

they will try everything they can.  All I can say is that I hope it's not enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, </p>
<p>they will try everything they can.  All I can say is that I hope it&#8217;s not enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
