<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Touch wood</title>
	<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/</link>
	<description>Blogging politics, culture, sociology and life from Brisvegas</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: "I'll kill you with my deadly jelly baby"</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-379834</link>
		<dc:creator>"I'll kill you with my deadly jelly baby"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-379834</guid>
		<description>Well, there was plenty of wood being torched in tonight's ep.  (I counted seven blokes "blown up" as it were!)  With a bit of Sapphic lip-sync-ing from the gap-toothed one to boot.  I'll give &lt;em&gt;Torchwood&lt;/em&gt; another few eps in the hope that it's 1/10th as good as the born-again (heh) &lt;em&gt;Dr Who&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there was plenty of wood being torched in tonight&#8217;s ep.  (I counted seven blokes &#8220;blown up&#8221; as it were!)  With a bit of Sapphic lip-sync-ing from the gap-toothed one to boot.  I&#8217;ll give <em>Torchwood</em> another few eps in the hope that it&#8217;s 1/10th as good as the born-again (heh) <em>Dr Who</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-378436</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-378436</guid>
		<description>Hee.  I'm actually moderately qualified to speak on this topic given my (abandoned) doctoral research on the aesthetics of 'bad' special effects..  

The problems with the FX in the opening episode partly revolve around the decision to film with what turned out to be a pretty dodgy high definition video camera (Torchwood is HD, unlike Doctor Who, which is still standard definition), which was replaced by a superior model in the second shooting block.  So the picture quality in general isn't as good as it is later, and the CG work has to blend in to the picture. But there's a lot less CG in Torchwood than in Doctor Who, which is a good thing because it costs at least twice as much to build and texture HD models as it does for the same in SD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hee.  I&#8217;m actually moderately qualified to speak on this topic given my (abandoned) doctoral research on the aesthetics of &#8216;bad&#8217; special effects..  </p>
<p>The problems with the FX in the opening episode partly revolve around the decision to film with what turned out to be a pretty dodgy high definition video camera (Torchwood is HD, unlike Doctor Who, which is still standard definition), which was replaced by a superior model in the second shooting block.  So the picture quality in general isn&#8217;t as good as it is later, and the CG work has to blend in to the picture. But there&#8217;s a lot less CG in Torchwood than in Doctor Who, which is a good thing because it costs at least twice as much to build and texture HD models as it does for the same in SD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-378277</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 02:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-378277</guid>
		<description>Actually, I thought it was an ironic postmodern reference to the traditional terrible Dr Who 70s special effects!

Either that, or the Beeb weren't sure whether it would be a big hit when the series was commissioned, and the budget wasn't big.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I thought it was an ironic postmodern reference to the traditional terrible Dr Who 70s special effects!</p>
<p>Either that, or the Beeb weren&#8217;t sure whether it would be a big hit when the series was commissioned, and the budget wasn&#8217;t big.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cat</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-378269</link>
		<dc:creator>Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 01:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-378269</guid>
		<description>Call me spoilt by the last few years of film, but I can't stand the Xena-level special effects they're using. Its not that hard to get things to move and render realistically any more. That stupid 'dactyl made me want to throw my tea at the screen*. Show was fun apart from that, mind.


*Also, I couldn't get past the fact that allowing a giant flying reptile into a room full of delicate equipment is perhaps not the wisest thing. What if it craps on something valuable?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me spoilt by the last few years of film, but I can&#8217;t stand the Xena-level special effects they&#8217;re using. Its not that hard to get things to move and render realistically any more. That stupid &#8216;dactyl made me want to throw my tea at the screen*. Show was fun apart from that, mind.</p>
<p>*Also, I couldn&#8217;t get past the fact that allowing a giant flying reptile into a room full of delicate equipment is perhaps not the wisest thing. What if it craps on something valuable?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-378079</link>
		<dc:creator>John Greenfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 09:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-378079</guid>
		<description>John Ryan

Amen my brother, on the ads. Same with SBS. If Labor gets in, all you Luvvies with influence MUST make them totally separate the GayBC and SBS from government. I fear a BBC-style TV licensing fee is the only way.

SBS News is one of the best in the world - possibly even better than PBSs' Newshour with Jim Lehrer, which I LOVE for the "homeliness" of its Lady journos. 

However, SBS's recent interspersing of five minutes of video and analysis from Gaza with "Go Harvey, Go Harvey, Go Harvey Norman, NOW is insupportable. How much more can a Koala bear!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Ryan</p>
<p>Amen my brother, on the ads. Same with SBS. If Labor gets in, all you Luvvies with influence MUST make them totally separate the GayBC and SBS from government. I fear a BBC-style TV licensing fee is the only way.</p>
<p>SBS News is one of the best in the world - possibly even better than PBSs&#8217; Newshour with Jim Lehrer, which I LOVE for the &#8220;homeliness&#8221; of its Lady journos. </p>
<p>However, SBS&#8217;s recent interspersing of five minutes of video and analysis from Gaza with &#8220;Go Harvey, Go Harvey, Go Harvey Norman, NOW is insupportable. How much more can a Koala bear!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-378037</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 07:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-378037</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Sam, but Torchwood's ratings were consistently astronomical across its entire 13 week run and, more importantly, its Audience Appreciation Index rating was extremely high -- so a lot of people watched it and a lot of the people who watched it rated it as excellent. 

(OK, I admit that it may be slightly hypocritical to defend so vociferously a show I have a few reservations about, but I'm a bit tired of how lazy some of the criticism is.)

And I'll just post the following from Outpost Gallifrey (the one-stop trainspotter site for Doctor Who Fans):

Torchwood has made a strong Australian debut in the ratings. It averaged 1,003,000 viewers in the five major capitals, winning its (time-adjusted) 9.40pm timeslot over Channel 7 (average 964,000 viewers) and Channel 9 (average 963,000 viewers). It enjoyed a 40% audience share in the 18-49 age group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Sam, but Torchwood&#8217;s ratings were consistently astronomical across its entire 13 week run and, more importantly, its Audience Appreciation Index rating was extremely high &#8212; so a lot of people watched it and a lot of the people who watched it rated it as excellent. </p>
<p>(OK, I admit that it may be slightly hypocritical to defend so vociferously a show I have a few reservations about, but I&#8217;m a bit tired of how lazy some of the criticism is.)</p>
<p>And I&#8217;ll just post the following from Outpost Gallifrey (the one-stop trainspotter site for Doctor Who Fans):</p>
<p>Torchwood has made a strong Australian debut in the ratings. It averaged 1,003,000 viewers in the five major capitals, winning its (time-adjusted) 9.40pm timeslot over Channel 7 (average 964,000 viewers) and Channel 9 (average 963,000 viewers). It enjoyed a 40% audience share in the 18-49 age group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ryan</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-378021</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 06:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-378021</guid>
		<description>I like it the only thing that annoyed me was the ADs cant stand em but the commerical TV does that,maybe it why I don,t watch it that often</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it the only thing that annoyed me was the ADs cant stand em but the commerical TV does that,maybe it why I don,t watch it that often</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skribe</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-378000</link>
		<dc:creator>skribe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 05:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-378000</guid>
		<description>I thought the first episode was weak, but I'll give it another couple of chances to improve.  I remember hating X-files initially.  So we'll see how TW goes.

Apart from the accent I don't like Gwen either.  She's too passive to be a central character IMPO.  Things happen to her and she reacts rather than acts to drive the story forward.  I hope that changes over the course of the series.  Having Capt. Jack already established and stealing every scene will make that difficult, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the first episode was weak, but I&#8217;ll give it another couple of chances to improve.  I remember hating X-files initially.  So we&#8217;ll see how TW goes.</p>
<p>Apart from the accent I don&#8217;t like Gwen either.  She&#8217;s too passive to be a central character IMPO.  Things happen to her and she reacts rather than acts to drive the story forward.  I hope that changes over the course of the series.  Having Capt. Jack already established and stealing every scene will make that difficult, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377984</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 04:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377984</guid>
		<description>Supun: Commander In Chief rated extremely well when it first started, too. I think Torchwood's problems are the same as that show's - just doesn't know what it wants to be, so won't find a long-term audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supun: Commander In Chief rated extremely well when it first started, too. I think Torchwood&#8217;s problems are the same as that show&#8217;s - just doesn&#8217;t know what it wants to be, so won&#8217;t find a long-term audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377983</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 04:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377983</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Oh, and using Cardiff is one of the more inspired location decisions in recent television history.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think the decision was inspired by the fact that the show is made by BBC Wales!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Oh, and using Cardiff is one of the more inspired location decisions in recent television history.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think the decision was inspired by the fact that the show is made by BBC Wales!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrLefty</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377982</link>
		<dc:creator>MrLefty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 04:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377982</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;"there was an episode called â€śBlinkâ€? a couple of weeks ago which was really stunning. Scary and poignant in equal measure."&lt;/i&gt;

Yes, truly excellent. Those statues...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;there was an episode called â€śBlinkâ€? a couple of weeks ago which was really stunning. Scary and poignant in equal measure.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Yes, truly excellent. Those statues&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supun</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377981</link>
		<dc:creator>Supun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 04:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377981</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I canâ€™t see it lasting past another season.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
It was the most watched show on digital TV in the UK every week and it broke ratings records.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I canâ€™t see it lasting past another season.</p></blockquote>
<p>It was the most watched show on digital TV in the UK every week and it broke ratings records.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377980</link>
		<dc:creator>John Greenfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 04:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377980</guid>
		<description>Oh, and using Cardiff is one of the more inspired location decisions in recent television history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and using Cardiff is one of the more inspired location decisions in recent television history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377977</link>
		<dc:creator>John Greenfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 04:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377977</guid>
		<description>Sex always sells and Captain Jack Harkness is much hotter than any of those eunuchs on Big Brother and Brothers and Sisters. Could Rachel Griffith be any more bland? Has she had a sex change? If not, perhaps she should.

Of course, do not even mention Media Watch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sex always sells and Captain Jack Harkness is much hotter than any of those eunuchs on Big Brother and Brothers and Sisters. Could Rachel Griffith be any more bland? Has she had a sex change? If not, perhaps she should.</p>
<p>Of course, do not even mention Media Watch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FDB</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377971</link>
		<dc:creator>FDB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 03:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377971</guid>
		<description>"Anthony, I was a bit iriitated by Gwen, but then I was also somewhat attracted to her (must be the gap in her front teeth)."

Ah yes, the Gwynneth Paltrow Effect. The gap in her front bosoms is not without charm also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anthony, I was a bit iriitated by Gwen, but then I was also somewhat attracted to her (must be the gap in her front teeth).&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah yes, the Gwynneth Paltrow Effect. The gap in her front bosoms is not without charm also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377967</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 03:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377967</guid>
		<description>Torchwood's tone is wildly inconsistent. Sometimes it feels like it's written by a bunch of pre-pubescent Dr Who fans pretending to be adults - but swears and gratuitous sex alone do not make a show adult. I can't see it lasting past another season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Torchwood&#8217;s tone is wildly inconsistent. Sometimes it feels like it&#8217;s written by a bunch of pre-pubescent Dr Who fans pretending to be adults - but swears and gratuitous sex alone do not make a show adult. I can&#8217;t see it lasting past another season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiasco da Gama</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377965</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiasco da Gama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 03:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377965</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Dr. Who in Cardiff with a lot of bisexuality&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Is he a lipsniger, tho'?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Dr. Who in Cardiff with a lot of bisexuality</p></blockquote>
<p>Is he a lipsniger, tho&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377964</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 03:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377964</guid>
		<description>Anthony, I was a bit iriitated by Gwen, but then I was also somewhat attracted to her (must be the gap in her front teeth).

I didn't mind it and I went in with my eyes shut, as i didn't realise it had anything to do with Dr Who. A show i was quite a big fan of as a child. Will continue watching i think until it either gets really stupid or i lose the attraction to Gwen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony, I was a bit iriitated by Gwen, but then I was also somewhat attracted to her (must be the gap in her front teeth).</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t mind it and I went in with my eyes shut, as i didn&#8217;t realise it had anything to do with Dr Who. A show i was quite a big fan of as a child. Will continue watching i think until it either gets really stupid or i lose the attraction to Gwen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Norton</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377962</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 03:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377962</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;the cats who will not be herded preferred to talk aboutâ€¦ the stuff they usually talk about&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Possibly the wrong animal metaphor, Kim.  How about the dogs who keep returning to each other's vomit, or the dead horses engaged in mutual flagellation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>the cats who will not be herded preferred to talk aboutâ€¦ the stuff they usually talk about</p></blockquote>
<p>Possibly the wrong animal metaphor, Kim.  How about the dogs who keep returning to each other&#8217;s vomit, or the dead horses engaged in mutual flagellation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377952</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 02:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/06/20/touch-wood/#comment-377952</guid>
		<description>I've seen a few episodes on the net. My main problem with the series is the main character (Gwen Cooper) just irritates me for some reason. There are some interesting plot lines but there isn't enough there to get me hooked in the same way Doctor Who does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen a few episodes on the net. My main problem with the series is the main character (Gwen Cooper) just irritates me for some reason. There are some interesting plot lines but there isn&#8217;t enough there to get me hooked in the same way Doctor Who does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
