Comments on: Family First candidate dumped for exposing his policy

By: Nabakov

Nabakov — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:39:41 +0000

Is there some kind of critical mass of bad puns which will cause the thread to explode?

Well I do believe this thread has probably reached a climax.

But if others want to jerk it back into life, then I wash my hands of the consequences.

By: Disgusted of Rydalmere

Disgusted of Rydalmere — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:03:11 +0000

Is there some kind of critical mass of bad puns which will cause the thread to explode? I think that point (nudge, wink) has nearly been passed.

By: Nabakov

Nabakov — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:25:22 +0000

I am going to photoshop Ron Jeremy’s Schlong onto a photo of myself and send it out to the relevant tabloids.

So why not the other way around? *insert small and mildly blue one-liner here*

Frankly I think this whole thing is much ado about nothing. Though it’s nice to see Family First weren’t prepared to settle for some out there dick as a sine quah non for pricking the public’s fancy.

Family First officials should get a good firm grip on themselves.

Easy for you to say. Harder for them to grasp.

By: Yobbo

Yobbo — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:00:41 +0000

I like this guy’s style. I am going to photoshop Ron Jeremy’s Schlong onto a photo of myself and send it out to the relevant tabloids.

By: typingisnotactivism

typingisnotactivism — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:18:31 +0000

“that’s not my penis,” said Mr Quah, “that’s my Tony Abbott impersonation.”

By: silkworm

silkworm — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 05:38:49 +0000

Mr Quah will not be participating in the ~~erection~~ election.

By: Andrew E

Andrew E — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:38:52 +0000

At least he’s not trying to slip it through the slot in Canada: [link]

By: Graham Bell

Graham Bell — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:54:21 +0000

Shaun and All;
I’m disappointed. We are going to be deprived of fiery debates in the House with spirited interjections of “Listen Donkey, your party doesn’t even have a policy on this!” or “Shut up, Shorty!” or “That’s right; humungous ignorance to match your humungous donger”. Parliament will be bland and boring without Mr Quah.

Family First officials should get a good firm grip on themselves. Human beings have all sorts of faults and frailties; angels are otherwise …. so, if they want to stay in politics, they had better get used to the difference.

By: Katz

Katz — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:45:04 +0000

Yairs.

I imagine this episode ends Andrew Quah’s dream of serving FF in a hung parliament.

By: joe2

joe2 — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:44:26 +0000

Hell, what kind of scrutiny is FF going for with their prospective candidates?

Surely, ‘circumcision’ is part of policy/scrutiny, for all member hopefuls.
It might not be ‘his’, as he suggests.
It could be a green one, for instance.

By: Ken Lovell

Ken Lovell — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:08:47 +0000

… my political enemies might have drugged me …

I really don’t understand why people are mocking this. It is after all the most likely explanation for Mark Latham.

By: absolut_andrew

absolut_andrew — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:47:48 +0000

Quah and myself that is. Lander would have been even worse.

By: absolut_andrew

absolut_andrew — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:38:00 +0000

Those quah revelations are the only reason why I would visit andrew lander’s blog. To think that we went to the same school. (shudders)

By: silkworm

silkworm — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:09:53 +0000

Noddy woke up one morning feeling a little quah…

By: David Rubie

David Rubie — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:19:36 +0000

I made the mistake of clicking through - never seen a bonsai todger before. I think it could use a little more trimming myself, at least according to the book he professes to follow.

By: Peterc

Peterc — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:18:34 +0000

Fielding should spend less time attacking others and more time screening his candidates. So much for “family friendly” values. Do as I say, not as I do . . .

By: Joe D

Joe D — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:09:48 +0000

Is it something within certain personalities that leads them to campaign for political office on morals while secretly indulging in behaviour that’s exactly opposite to those morals? Not that I know what Quah’s professed morals are, it just seems like it might be a trend.

By: Mercurius

Mercurius — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:02:17 +0000

Perhaps he took the name ‘Family First’ too literally and so became inspired to show off the family jewels.

By: Meself

Meself — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:15:54 +0000

Anyone old enough to remember that pre-Cambrian TV game show “Tell the Truth” ?

“Celebrity panel game show based on a US original in which the panel team had to guess which one of a trio of contestants was actually telling the truth about a given statement. George Foster was first host and then Mike Williamson (from 1965). Revived by the 10 Network in 1971 with Earle Bailey hosting.”

“Would the real Quah penis please stand up?”

Oh, guess not, It seems to be a Quahzi penis.”

What a d…!

Seems ‘FF’ attracts very odd (Boom, boom!) *members*.

By: gandhi

gandhi — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:12:14 +0000

Crikey suggests that Family First’s online recruitment could be to blame, and they have some very misogynistic quotes from Quah’s student days.

Maybe this officer can explain to me why it is that all men are “r-pists”, “s-xual harassers”, “woman beaters”. Or why domestic violence is defined in one reputable source as “emotional, as well as s-xual or physical abuse of women in their homes by partners”, despite the results of 122 scholarly investigations, 99 empirical studies and 23 analyses, with an aggregate sample size of over 77,000 respondents, demonstrating that women are in fact more likely to commit acts of domestic violence against their partners or children.

You gotta click that link for the cartoon alone!

Crikey also have a look at four other election wierdos.