Not so pithy

You remember “Banner-gate”: the controversy over the White House’s shifting explanations for the now-infamous “Mission Accomplished” banner on the aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln that President Bush stood before in his carefully plotted photo-op exactly five years ago tomorrow.

Knowing what’s coming, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said today, “President Bush is well aware that the banner should have been much more specific and said ‘mission accomplished’ for these sailors who are on this ship on their mission. And we have certainly paid a price for not being more specific on that banner. And I recognize that the media is going to play this up again tomorrow, as they do every single year.”

It’s the anniversary of Bush’s “Mission Accomplished” photo-op.

Share this...
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • e-mail

8 Responses to “Not so pithy”


  1. 1 KatzNo Gravatar

    But wait!

    In a pre-recorded message from soemwhere in Pakistan, Osama bin Laden has claimed responsibility for erecting that troublesome “Mission Accomplished” banner.

    White House spokeswoman Dana Perino announced: “The President wants the American people to see that this is proof that we are fighting a determined and resourceful enemy who will stop at nothing to undermine our non-negotiable way of life.”

  2. 2 Tony DNo Gravatar

    Neo-cons, the gift that keeps on giving eh?

    I actually kinda hope that Johnny Boy McCain wins, that way we’ll get one of these every couple of months.

  3. 3 Paul BurnsNo Gravatar

    And Tatty agreed with all this rubbish. Which is why he was never listed as one of t5he world’s ten most influential people. Him and Hyacynth musta been screaming at the tele in the Wollstonecraft cottasge this morning as they watched the Packer Puppets report it, somewhat demeaningly, no doubt on Ratty’s telephoned instructions. No wonder thje world calls Bush the American Imbecile.

  4. 4 KingsleyNo Gravatar

    Might I humbly suggest you people get over your banner fetish, it is starting to look silly, Iraq gets better daily, Al Sadr’s JM gets significantly degraded daily and his supposed loyal subjects are delighted and all you people can point to is “ahh but they had “mission Accomplished” on the banner” – Whoopee!

  5. 5 KatzNo Gravatar

    Might I humbly suggest you people get over your banner fetish, it is starting to look silly, Iraq gets better daily, Al Sadr’s JM gets significantly degraded daily and his supposed loyal subjects are delighted and all you people can point to is “ahh but they had “mission Accomplished” on the banner” – Whoopee!

    Oh my, how naive…

    This isn’t about the last war. This is about the next war.

    The next war is the battle to keep McCain’s ageing posterior off the Oval Office swivel chair.

    Trouble is, Kingsley, US voters have already made up their minds about the Iraq Fiasco. Al Sadr doesn’t loom very large in their thinking.

    McCain has promised 100 more years of “Mission Accomplished”. The folks are very gun-shy about that prospect.

    The Iraq Tar Baby is going to sink McCain and much of the GOP. The banner absurdity simply fans the flames of GOP annihilation

    Good.

  6. 6 Ken LovellNo Gravatar

    Yes Kingsley, we have always been at war with the Sadrists and we invaded Iraq to rid the world of the evil dictator Moqtada. It’s all becoming clearer by the day.

  7. 7 Down and Out of Sài GònNo Gravatar

    Might I humbly suggest you people get over your banner fetish, it is starting to look silly, Iraq gets better daily, Al Sadr’s JM gets significantly degraded daily and his supposed loyal subjects are delighted and all you people can point to is “ahh but they had “mission Accomplished” on the banner” – Whoopee!

    Kingsley: last I heard, Sadr was cramming for his Ayatollah exams, and wasn’t playing a day-to-day role in Sadr City, or anywhere else in Iraq. No matter. If parliamentary delegations leave their own counrty to engage in peacetalks with him, then al-Sadr remains a very important person indeed.

    A delegation from Shiite lawmakers in the Iraqi parliament headed to Iran for talks with anti-U.S. cleric Muqtada al-Sadr to end ongoing clashes between Sadr followers and U.S-backed Iraqi troops, a Sadr spokesman said on Thursday.

    Sheikh Salah al-Obeidi, spokesman for Sadr in the central holy city of Najaf, said five lawmakers led by deputy parliament speaker Sheikh Khalid al-Attiya traveled to Iran on Wednesday.

    “A delegation from the Unified Iraqi Alliance (UIA) in the parliament headed by Sheikh Khalid al-Attiya, went to Iran to meet Saiyyd Muqtada al-Sadr there and other leaders of the Sadr movement who are in Iran, to negotiate with him a way out of the crisis,” Obeidi said.

    Obeidi’s remarks is the first acknowledgment by Sadr followers that their leader is in Iran.

  8. 8 JaneNo Gravatar

    Heard somewhere on the ether that 70% of Americans think Dubya is the worst president in history. It may have been in the headlines in the lead-up to Lateline or it could have been during the day. I’ve been engaged in a time consuming and frustrating domestic task all week so have lost all sense of time and proportion and can’t provide a link. Anyone mentioning curtains will be summarily executed!

Leave a Reply

Please read the comments policy. If you would like an icon beside your comment, please register a Gravatar.

There is a Comments Preview function below the typing box which activates when you start typing.

Allowed tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Examples:

<strong>Strong</strong>= Strong
<em>Emphasized</em> = Emphasized
<a href="http://www.url.com">Linked text</a>= Linked text
<blockquote>Quoted Text</blockquote>