« profile & posts archive

This author has written 1040 posts for Larvatus Prodeo.

Return to: Homepage | Blog Index

8 responses to “Polls mean whatever journalists want them to mean”

  1. tigtog

    Sheesh, that’s sure some shonky poll-spinning. It must make them seethe now that they get picked up on this stuff so quickly by the polblogs (and even more so by the specialist pollblogs), but how much of that fact-checking gets through to the average punters as yet?

    Those of us who are far more interested in this than the average bear know that we can go and check out the poll with far more access to the source tables etc though Pollbludger and Pollytix, but is that affecting the way the MSM spins polls yet, considering that the spin isn’t is aimed elsewhere than at us wonks?

  2. cosmicjester

    Dennis Shannahan would be proud

  3. wpd

    The journalist in question is only being consistent with what he usually writes. Enough said.

  4. Thomas Paine

    I could never work out if murdoch journalists were whores or pimps but I think they are both. Pimping Turnbull to the public and whoring themselves to the Liberal party. I guess it makes them feel good.

  5. Mark

    wpd @ 3 – yep.

    tigtog @ 1 – I imagine that anyone who cared enough to either google the poll result (and hit on pseph blogs) or even to go through the tables without preconceptions would be able to work out what the poll really says. But that’d be a small minority. On the other hand, the vast majority of readers of the Courier-Mail wouldn’t pay much attention. To the degree that they do, talking up the Libs’ chances constantly probably doesn’t do the Labor Party and the Greens’ chances any harm at the most pragmatic level.

  6. Adrien

    Kim obviously you are a hopeless communist. In this Rupertocracy we reject Communism as it erodes freedom. The freedom to trade, the freedom to think and most importantly the freedom not to.
    .
    That’s why we’re going to have to incarcerate you in a mental institution and/or send you to a labour camp. To oppose your Stalinism.
    .
    Sorry. But it’s for freedom.

  7. Guy

    Very lazy stuff there from the Courier Mail.

  8. wpd

    “Very lazy stuff there from the Courier Mail.”

    I don’t think ‘laziness’ lies at the heart of the problem. In fact, ‘laziness’ imho is a non-issue.

    The reporter in question continues to make ‘predictions’ even though his track record is woeful. Tis ideological blindness that needs to be addressed and there’s not much chance of that.

Leave a Reply