Republished from Crikey with permission.
Since it was announced in April, barely a peep has been heard from the Grattan Institute, Kevin Rudd’s $50 million super think tank named after a street abutting Melbourne University. Headed by ex-McKinsyite John Daley, it’s supposed to mimic the Washington-based Brookings Institution, the think-tank of choice for Clinton-era centrists. But if the list of backers is any guide, the local version’s shaping up as the intellectual playground for a new-Ruddism, backed by a truckload of taxpayer cash.
The Institute says it will be “apolitical”, dealing with “fact-based” conundrums, as if facts are ideologically neutral and government the preserve of disinterested policy wonks. But it really represents the dawning of a new era as the right-wing think tanks of decades past are subsumed by the ALP-connected. Add Grattan to outfits like OzProspect and PerCapita — whose bright sparks attempt to solve society’s problems through their own enlightened managerialism — and you’ve got an intellectual revolution afoot.
Grattan (nothing to do with Michelle, apparently) is the brainchild of ex-Victorian public service scion Terry Moran. Moran was picked to head the Prime Minister’s department in February and the Institute got the green light shortly afterwards. Its chief spruiker and chairman is the illustrious Allan Myers QC and the board reads like a who’s who of plugged-in elites including Melbourne University Vice Chancellor Glyn Davis and Moran’s VPS successor Helen Silver. Victorian Treasurer John Lenders is also involved — his government matched Canberra’s initial $15 million cash injection.
A horrified John Roskam of the right-leaning Institute for Public Affairs said last month that he’d be “absolutely amazed if it [Grattan] could accommodate an opinion critical of a Labor government.” He has every reason to be concerned — the IPA, and its ideological bedfellows at the Centre for Independent Studies and Gerard Henderson’s Sydney Institute have been effectively frozen out of the national debate. The idea of Rudd launching a major policy initiative alongside someone like Henderson, as John Howard did with the Intervention, is all but unthinkable.
At the other end of the ideological spectrum, the union-funded Catalyst, with a shoestring budget of $220,000 per year and 1.4 full-time staff, hopes Rudd’s ideas factory won’t monopolise debate and discussion at the expense of actual progressive thought:
“I would hope that the Grattan Institute would reach out from the policy insiders and build community links with other independent think tanks,” Catalyst Executive Officer Jo-anne Schofield told Crikey.
“I think it would be a real shame if it marginalised progressive thinking. It should support a freer model of thinking.”
But the Grattan Institute is on different plane — it’s shaping up as a quasi arm of government that replaces frank and fearless advice with something eminently more pliable. The irony is that the Rudd Government’s obsession with experts (detailed in Crikey earlier this year) reflects less a return to a disinterested public service and more a proliferation of pick-and-mix advice witnessed at 2020. Grattan is looking like a permanent 2020, staffed by wonks rather than celebrities.
Even if Grattan was to evolve as a crucible for a vibrant ‘new-Ruddism’, it ignores the complete lack of content at the centre-left’s ideological core. Third Way trailblazers like Demos (remember their 14-dimensional plan to save child care?) are now so out of favour among governments as to appear a sad anachronism. Of course, think tanks have been historically the preserve of the political right — they provide a haven for pro-business ideas likely to founder in the face of mass democracy or social movements. Their left and centre-left derivations represent for the most part a backlash.
Crikey understands the PM was hunkered down at Grattan Street’s Prince Alfred Hotel last weekend celebrating the birthday of one of Glyn Davis’ offspring. It’s safe to assume the duo was also toasting the endless possibilities for a $50 million ideas quango to call their very own.




I thought Demos people became PerCapita?
Before we start congratulating ourselves in the inevitable thirdway-intellectuals-bad, third-way-intellectuals-steal-Labor’s-soul circle jerk, can we at least congratulate the Pseud-in-Chief for making Liberal candidate Roskam and his fellow wingnut welfare recipients feel horrified even as the unions’ think tank bloke expresses hope?
“Can we at least also congratulate the Pseud…” or perhaps, “Can we at least acknowledge the Pseud…”
Somehow I’m not comforted by the idea of battling the wingnut noise factory/opinion farm/cash for comment collective represented by the IPA with…
A differently biased noise factory/opinion farm/cash for comment crew.
I’d be much happier if the government simply donated money to a project like SourceWatch and left it at that. Government departments are supposed to do the heavy lifting of formulating efficient policy to the aims of the current administration, aren’t they? Why else would we have them?
Centre-left?
“Centre-left” is code Paul, for saying “I solemnly promise not to formulate any policies that might be even slightly seen as socialist, please don’t feed me to Piers Akerman, he looks hungry again”.
Ah! But they are feeding the poor. Sort of.
Ooh, ooh, does every columnist get a think-tank named after them?
Here are the latest fact-related issues being investigated at…
—
The Bolt Institute – Mock indignation: Best laid on with a trowel or a shovel?
The Blair Initiative – The effects of placing one hand under opposite armpit and making rapid chicken-wing movements with said arm.
The Akerman Foundation – Marginal effectiveness of checking under the bed twice a day vs. three times.
The Milne Project – Optimum number of hands required to locate backside.
The Shanahan Centre – 50 different ways with irrelevance.
Though their selection from among other facts might not be, facts are — or at least, if your ideology is in good order, should be — ideologically neutral.
For those who don’t know, Melbourne University is on Grattan Street.
It’s probable that the institute’s publications will be less perceptive than Michelle’s. They’ll certainly be less amusing!