<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Howard&#039;s back! II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/01/06/howards-back-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/01/06/howards-back-ii/</link>
	<description>Life, Culture and Politics from BrisVegas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:16:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: terangeree</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/01/06/howards-back-ii/#comment-178845</link>
		<dc:creator>terangeree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/01/06/howards-back-ii/#comment-178845</guid>
		<description>But it&#039;s Blair House for Zokor, Mrs Zokor, and &lt;em&gt;entourage&lt;/em&gt;. At the Australian taxpayer&#039;s expense, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But it&#8217;s Blair House for Zokor, Mrs Zokor, and <em>entourage</em>. At the Australian taxpayer&#8217;s expense, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DesLivres</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/01/06/howards-back-ii/#comment-178844</link>
		<dc:creator>DesLivres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/01/06/howards-back-ii/#comment-178844</guid>
		<description>My view of JH is the same as Lovell@55&#039;s.

Having said that, unpleasant as they are, they are only 2 people, and Blair House has 119 rooms. How come there wasn&#039;t room for another 4 people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My view of JH is the same as Lovell@55&#8242;s.</p>
<p>Having said that, unpleasant as they are, they are only 2 people, and Blair House has 119 rooms. How come there wasn&#8217;t room for another 4 people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terangeree</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/01/06/howards-back-ii/#comment-178843</link>
		<dc:creator>terangeree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/01/06/howards-back-ii/#comment-178843</guid>
		<description>According to the website &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.agmates.com/blog/2009/01/10/john-howard-mentors-barnaby-joyce-to-move-to-lower-house/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Agmates Rural News&lt;/a&gt;, Australa&#039;s favorite zokor is advising Barney Joyce to move to the House of Reps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the website <a href="http://www.agmates.com/blog/2009/01/10/john-howard-mentors-barnaby-joyce-to-move-to-lower-house/" rel="nofollow">Agmates Rural News</a>, Australa&#8217;s favorite zokor is advising Barney Joyce to move to the House of Reps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danny</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/01/06/howards-back-ii/#comment-178842</link>
		<dc:creator>danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/01/06/howards-back-ii/#comment-178842</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Dazza @62: going into baghdad streets would be way safer than getting between Hyacinth and the chance to be on the receiving end of some old fashioned new-idea-type Pomp and Circumstance: 119 rooms, that&#039;s what I call a doll&#039;s house to play dress ups in.
David Rowe gave us a puzzling and disturbing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/the-kitchensink-index/2007/12/23/1198175424017.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;image  &lt;/a&gt; of what the PM&#039;s have to deal with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Dazza @62: going into baghdad streets would be way safer than getting between Hyacinth and the chance to be on the receiving end of some old fashioned new-idea-type Pomp and Circumstance: 119 rooms, that&#8217;s what I call a doll&#8217;s house to play dress ups in.<br />
David Rowe gave us a puzzling and disturbing <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/the-kitchensink-index/2007/12/23/1198175424017.html" rel="nofollow">image  </a> of what the PM&#8217;s have to deal with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Burns</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/01/06/howards-back-ii/#comment-178841</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 04:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/01/06/howards-back-ii/#comment-178841</guid>
		<description>I can, boo. Its a reflex lie. He&#039;s done it so many times that he probably no longer realises he&#039;s doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can, boo. Its a reflex lie. He&#8217;s done it so many times that he probably no longer realises he&#8217;s doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boo</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/01/06/howards-back-ii/#comment-178840</link>
		<dc:creator>boo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/01/06/howards-back-ii/#comment-178840</guid>
		<description>I cannot believe that he &amp; his are still trotting out the &quot;nobody told John&quot; defence - too funny (at least it is now that he&#039;s out of office).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot believe that he &amp; his are still trotting out the &#8220;nobody told John&#8221; defence &#8211; too funny (at least it is now that he&#8217;s out of office).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Burns</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/01/06/howards-back-ii/#comment-178839</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/01/06/howards-back-ii/#comment-178839</guid>
		<description>Oh, yes, I readily admit all that, joe2. OMG, I&#039;m getting nasty shivers up the spine the way one does when one hears creeaking chalk on a blackboard just thinking about the little turd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, yes, I readily admit all that, joe2. OMG, I&#8217;m getting nasty shivers up the spine the way one does when one hears creeaking chalk on a blackboard just thinking about the little turd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terangeree</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/01/06/howards-back-ii/#comment-178838</link>
		<dc:creator>terangeree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/01/06/howards-back-ii/#comment-178838</guid>
		<description>Kingsley tap-danced the following upon the board of keys:
&lt;blockquote&gt;So we have a situation where Howard was properly offered accomodation at Blair House then the Obama’s request to move in weeks earlier than normal and its apparently all John Howard’s fault.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Old chap, did you miss Shaun&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28544447/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;? Here is the relevant part of the interview for you:

&lt;blockquote&gt;CARLSON:  Well, I reported, but also the “Washington Post” reported on December 11th and 12th that there were no foreign dignitaries booked into Blair House during that period of time. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

JWH was, apparently, the &lt;em&gt;third&lt;/em&gt; on the list, after Blair House was offered to the other two recipients of the medal -- Tony Blair and Alvaro Uribe. Blair is staying at the British Embassy, and Uribe also declined the offer of Blair House. Uribe&#039;s political history is, to say the least, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.colombiajournal.org/colombia185.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;, interesting,&lt;/a&gt; with explicit links to an &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Self-Defense_Forces_of_Colombia&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;organization&lt;/a&gt; which the US State Department &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/fs/37191.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;classes&lt;/a&gt; as a foreign terrorist group (they&#039;re number 42 on the list).

But as I&#039;m beginning to ride off on a tangent, I&#039;ll stop at that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kingsley tap-danced the following upon the board of keys:</p>
<blockquote><p>So we have a situation where Howard was properly offered accomodation at Blair House then the Obama’s request to move in weeks earlier than normal and its apparently all John Howard’s fault.</p></blockquote>
<p>Old chap, did you miss Shaun&#8217;s <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28544447/" rel="nofollow">link</a>? Here is the relevant part of the interview for you:</p>
<blockquote><p>CARLSON:  Well, I reported, but also the “Washington Post” reported on December 11th and 12th that there were no foreign dignitaries booked into Blair House during that period of time. </p></blockquote>
<p>JWH was, apparently, the <em>third</em> on the list, after Blair House was offered to the other two recipients of the medal &#8212; Tony Blair and Alvaro Uribe. Blair is staying at the British Embassy, and Uribe also declined the offer of Blair House. Uribe&#8217;s political history is, to say the least, <a href="http://www.colombiajournal.org/colombia185.htm" rel="nofollow">, interesting,</a> with explicit links to an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Self-Defense_Forces_of_Colombia" rel="nofollow">organization</a> which the US State Department <a href="http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/fs/37191.htm" rel="nofollow">classes</a> as a foreign terrorist group (they&#8217;re number 42 on the list).</p>
<p>But as I&#8217;m beginning to ride off on a tangent, I&#8217;ll stop at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe2</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/01/06/howards-back-ii/#comment-178837</link>
		<dc:creator>joe2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/01/06/howards-back-ii/#comment-178837</guid>
		<description>&quot;Fair go. Les Patterson is funny.&quot;

True, Paul, but you have to admit that Howard is further developing the role of an excruciatingly embarrassing ambassador who splutters, sucks up and over-indulges. While its not funny, for the reasons Ken nails so well, he is certainly giving old Les a run for his money in the current cringeworthy stakes. Though Dolly is still in with an outside chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Fair go. Les Patterson is funny.&#8221;</p>
<p>True, Paul, but you have to admit that Howard is further developing the role of an excruciatingly embarrassing ambassador who splutters, sucks up and over-indulges. While its not funny, for the reasons Ken nails so well, he is certainly giving old Les a run for his money in the current cringeworthy stakes. Though Dolly is still in with an outside chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Burns</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/01/06/howards-back-ii/#comment-178836</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/01/06/howards-back-ii/#comment-178836</guid>
		<description>Ken Lovell @ 55,
Couldn&#039;t agree more.

Kingsley,
One of the reasons I like calling Howard Ratty is because it annoys RWDBs. To the point that when I called him that in a letter to the local paper some time ago one of Armidale&#039;s better known RWDBs publicly remonstrated with me about it in the Armidale Mall. Now that&#039;s what I call a successful agitation. My only objection to the term is it sometimes obscures all the disgusting things Howard did while PM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken Lovell @ 55,<br />
Couldn&#8217;t agree more.</p>
<p>Kingsley,<br />
One of the reasons I like calling Howard Ratty is because it annoys RWDBs. To the point that when I called him that in a letter to the local paper some time ago one of Armidale&#8217;s better known RWDBs publicly remonstrated with me about it in the Armidale Mall. Now that&#8217;s what I call a successful agitation. My only objection to the term is it sometimes obscures all the disgusting things Howard did while PM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

