<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The structural separation we&#039;ve always wanted?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/04/07/the-structural-separation-weve-always-wanted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/04/07/the-structural-separation-weve-always-wanted/</link>
	<description>Life, Culture and Politics from BrisVegas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:53:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: yeti</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/04/07/the-structural-separation-weve-always-wanted/#comment-159959</link>
		<dc:creator>yeti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/04/07/the-structural-separation-weve-always-wanted/#comment-159959</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Would I pay $100-200 to access all FTTH offers, inc the world’s TV on my computer (no need for fancy TV sets, “cable TV”, movie hire, newspapers etc etc etc)? Dumb question!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, but what cap are they going to stick on this? 50GB-80GB sounds like a lot at first, but not when you consider it as a replacement for TV, radio etc. You can get uncapped internet at a reasonable price in most other countries but in Australia we have to have these piddling little caps and we&#039;ll probably still have them with RuddNet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Would I pay $100-200 to access all FTTH offers, inc the world’s TV on my computer (no need for fancy TV sets, “cable TV”, movie hire, newspapers etc etc etc)? Dumb question!</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, but what cap are they going to stick on this? 50GB-80GB sounds like a lot at first, but not when you consider it as a replacement for TV, radio etc. You can get uncapped internet at a reasonable price in most other countries but in Australia we have to have these piddling little caps and we&#8217;ll probably still have them with RuddNet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/04/07/the-structural-separation-weve-always-wanted/#comment-159958</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/04/07/the-structural-separation-weve-always-wanted/#comment-159958</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;As for monthly cost … When Internet was a pup, I paid $750 py for my initial “uncapped” dial-up private internet connection; by 2003 $49.99 pm; later $24. Would I pay $100-200 to access all FTTH offers, inc the world’s TV on my computer (no need for fancy TV sets, “cable TV”, movie hire, newspapers etc etc etc)? Dumb question!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t think you&#039;re the common case for how much people are willing to pay for an internet connection. Remember content will in most cases be an additional cost unless you&#039;re willing to break copyright. Good to see in the news that Labor are looking at the cost of international data (and a bit at interstate data as well) - high speed connections are not much use if you can&#039;t afford to use them.

Huggybunny @ 144 - agreed that software as a service is the way we&#039;re heading. With a good enough network most people who just want a web browser and a word processor may not even need much of an OS at home - back to dumb terminals again :-) I&#039;m getting increasingly skeptical over the costs though - but hey if the government wants to hugely subsidise something I like to use who am I to complain :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>As for monthly cost … When Internet was a pup, I paid $750 py for my initial “uncapped” dial-up private internet connection; by 2003 $49.99 pm; later $24. Would I pay $100-200 to access all FTTH offers, inc the world’s TV on my computer (no need for fancy TV sets, “cable TV”, movie hire, newspapers etc etc etc)? Dumb question!</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re the common case for how much people are willing to pay for an internet connection. Remember content will in most cases be an additional cost unless you&#8217;re willing to break copyright. Good to see in the news that Labor are looking at the cost of international data (and a bit at interstate data as well) &#8211; high speed connections are not much use if you can&#8217;t afford to use them.</p>
<p>Huggybunny @ 144 &#8211; agreed that software as a service is the way we&#8217;re heading. With a good enough network most people who just want a web browser and a word processor may not even need much of an OS at home &#8211; back to dumb terminals again <img src='http://larvatusprodeo.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  I&#8217;m getting increasingly skeptical over the costs though &#8211; but hey if the government wants to hugely subsidise something I like to use who am I to complain <img src='http://larvatusprodeo.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huggybunny</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/04/07/the-structural-separation-weve-always-wanted/#comment-159957</link>
		<dc:creator>Huggybunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/04/07/the-structural-separation-weve-always-wanted/#comment-159957</guid>
		<description>There are a few of the rather remarkable consequences of a fully implemented fibre to the home service.
1. The end of the microsoft pc software business (hooray)
2. No need for any resident software on mac or pc except for the operating system
3. Access to supercomputers that are formed by networking subscribing computers
4. Access to computationally intensive applications such as powerful modelling    programs and 3D CAD for any-one who needs it at vastly reduced cost
5. The end of broadcast TV
6. The democratisation of the media
7. The complete end of the copper wire telephone network
8. The complete integration of electricity systems into the home.

The list goes on and on. In short a total revolution that cannot ever be supported by &quot;broadband&quot;. Well the only way you could do it would be to install waveguides to every home.(Sort of like fibre optics except slower and more costly). Oh and did I mention that a National system of broadband service with the same speed and capacity as fibre optics would require about 2 GW of extra power stations to be built?
Huggy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a few of the rather remarkable consequences of a fully implemented fibre to the home service.<br />
1. The end of the microsoft pc software business (hooray)<br />
2. No need for any resident software on mac or pc except for the operating system<br />
3. Access to supercomputers that are formed by networking subscribing computers<br />
4. Access to computationally intensive applications such as powerful modelling    programs and 3D CAD for any-one who needs it at vastly reduced cost<br />
5. The end of broadcast TV<br />
6. The democratisation of the media<br />
7. The complete end of the copper wire telephone network<br />
8. The complete integration of electricity systems into the home.</p>
<p>The list goes on and on. In short a total revolution that cannot ever be supported by &#8220;broadband&#8221;. Well the only way you could do it would be to install waveguides to every home.(Sort of like fibre optics except slower and more costly). Oh and did I mention that a National system of broadband service with the same speed and capacity as fibre optics would require about 2 GW of extra power stations to be built?<br />
Huggy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vee</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/04/07/the-structural-separation-weve-always-wanted/#comment-159956</link>
		<dc:creator>Vee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 01:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/04/07/the-structural-separation-weve-always-wanted/#comment-159956</guid>
		<description>A second comment caught in spam filter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A second comment caught in spam filter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vee</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/04/07/the-structural-separation-weve-always-wanted/#comment-159955</link>
		<dc:creator>Vee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/04/07/the-structural-separation-weve-always-wanted/#comment-159955</guid>
		<description>Indeed the Page Research Centre did propose something similar, as I blogged on the issue when I ran one and the original Age article that mentions it can be found at: &lt;a href=&quot;http://vee.shockwavese.com/wordpress/2005/07/27/telstra/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2005/03/18/1111086011839.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed the Page Research Centre did propose something similar, as I blogged on the issue when I ran one and the original Age article that mentions it can be found at: <a href="http://vee.shockwavese.com/wordpress/2005/07/27/telstra/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2005/03/18/1111086011839.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vee</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/04/07/the-structural-separation-weve-always-wanted/#comment-159954</link>
		<dc:creator>Vee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/04/07/the-structural-separation-weve-always-wanted/#comment-159954</guid>
		<description>I just hope it comes to fruition.  I&#039;m with Bigpond paying $60pm for a lousy 256/64kb 12GB DSL liberty plan and lately in the mail, they want me to grab a NextG modem (wireless) with faster speeds and a limit of 5GB plus extra if I go over for a similar price.

This is what Telstra was going to roll out instead of a decent NBN plan, what a laughing stock.

If I have a faster speed, I need a higher download limit, it is inevitable as I will be able to peruse video content much faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just hope it comes to fruition.  I&#8217;m with Bigpond paying $60pm for a lousy 256/64kb 12GB DSL liberty plan and lately in the mail, they want me to grab a NextG modem (wireless) with faster speeds and a limit of 5GB plus extra if I go over for a similar price.</p>
<p>This is what Telstra was going to roll out instead of a decent NBN plan, what a laughing stock.</p>
<p>If I have a faster speed, I need a higher download limit, it is inevitable as I will be able to peruse video content much faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ginja</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/04/07/the-structural-separation-weve-always-wanted/#comment-159953</link>
		<dc:creator>Ginja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 08:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/04/07/the-structural-separation-weve-always-wanted/#comment-159953</guid>
		<description>Fair point, Labor Outsider - it&#039;s hard not to sound condescending or pompous even when blogging.

I just finished &quot;The Return of Depression Economics&quot; - brilliant and terrifying read.  Have you read it?  Be honest.

True, Krugman&#039;s fallible like the rest of us, and I&#039;ve heard people dismiss Krugman - though I&#039;ve yet to pin down the reasons why.  I understand the Right&#039;s reasons - they started attacking him once he became an unabashed liberal, even though, awkwardly, some right-wing intellectuals once praised him.  But what are your reasons?

I often wonder how much the centre-Left really reads the centre-Left.  Perhaps it&#039;s capitalism imploding around us, but lately I&#039;ve found myself reading all those dusty old secondhand John Kenneth Galbraiths I bought years ago but never got around to reading.  After all, I had the gist of Galbraith nailed down, so why bother?  I have the sense that many on our side don&#039;t bother to properly read the likes of Krugman or Galbraith, that they&#039;ve been subtly influenced by the Right&#039;s tactic of automatically dismissing anyone not on the Right as &quot;discredited&quot;.

The thing that impresses me about Krugman is that he was once considered a moderate (read neoliberal-ish) and seems to have changed his views on the basis of evidence.

And like Galbraith, is Krugman now dismissed because he&#039;s admired by plebs like me and can write an intelligible sentence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair point, Labor Outsider &#8211; it&#8217;s hard not to sound condescending or pompous even when blogging.</p>
<p>I just finished &#8220;The Return of Depression Economics&#8221; &#8211; brilliant and terrifying read.  Have you read it?  Be honest.</p>
<p>True, Krugman&#8217;s fallible like the rest of us, and I&#8217;ve heard people dismiss Krugman &#8211; though I&#8217;ve yet to pin down the reasons why.  I understand the Right&#8217;s reasons &#8211; they started attacking him once he became an unabashed liberal, even though, awkwardly, some right-wing intellectuals once praised him.  But what are your reasons?</p>
<p>I often wonder how much the centre-Left really reads the centre-Left.  Perhaps it&#8217;s capitalism imploding around us, but lately I&#8217;ve found myself reading all those dusty old secondhand John Kenneth Galbraiths I bought years ago but never got around to reading.  After all, I had the gist of Galbraith nailed down, so why bother?  I have the sense that many on our side don&#8217;t bother to properly read the likes of Krugman or Galbraith, that they&#8217;ve been subtly influenced by the Right&#8217;s tactic of automatically dismissing anyone not on the Right as &#8220;discredited&#8221;.</p>
<p>The thing that impresses me about Krugman is that he was once considered a moderate (read neoliberal-ish) and seems to have changed his views on the basis of evidence.</p>
<p>And like Galbraith, is Krugman now dismissed because he&#8217;s admired by plebs like me and can write an intelligible sentence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Labor Outsider</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/04/07/the-structural-separation-weve-always-wanted/#comment-159952</link>
		<dc:creator>Labor Outsider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/04/07/the-structural-separation-weve-always-wanted/#comment-159952</guid>
		<description>Ginja - that is pretty condescending! I am a professional economist that is already well aware Krugman&#039;s views on the role for government at the present economic juncture. You have missed the point of what I said. Even if we take as given that government needs to fill some of the hole in private demand, that does not mean that long-term infrastructure projects should proceed without cost-benefit tests. Projects have to be assessed on a case by case basis. This one might pass such a test and it might not - but you can&#039;t arrive at a conclusion by simply counting up the jobs it will supposedly create. You also have to be careful about making simplistic analogies between the current economic situation in the US and Australia, or the US and anywhere else for that matter.  Krugman may be a brilliant man, but he is not the font of all wisdom on matters economic. You will get a more nuanced perspective if you read him with a more critical eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ginja &#8211; that is pretty condescending! I am a professional economist that is already well aware Krugman&#8217;s views on the role for government at the present economic juncture. You have missed the point of what I said. Even if we take as given that government needs to fill some of the hole in private demand, that does not mean that long-term infrastructure projects should proceed without cost-benefit tests. Projects have to be assessed on a case by case basis. This one might pass such a test and it might not &#8211; but you can&#8217;t arrive at a conclusion by simply counting up the jobs it will supposedly create. You also have to be careful about making simplistic analogies between the current economic situation in the US and Australia, or the US and anywhere else for that matter.  Krugman may be a brilliant man, but he is not the font of all wisdom on matters economic. You will get a more nuanced perspective if you read him with a more critical eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/04/07/the-structural-separation-weve-always-wanted/#comment-159951</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/04/07/the-structural-separation-weve-always-wanted/#comment-159951</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That the tubes should be made wide enough to allow the grubby proletariat access to all the tools and services that are now the province of the academic elite is an unthinkable situation.
The smell of threatened privilege is wafting across the land.
The hairy palmed wannabe professors we are going to have to learn to share - get it?
Huggy&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Lemme at those tools and services; I&#039;ll buy the wannabes some razors and suck up the stench of threatened privilege. Ahhh! like the odour of a bbq in full flight on a lazy Saturday arvo.

&lt;blockquote&gt;As for monthly cost … When Internet was a pup, I paid $750 py for my initial “uncapped” dial-up private internet connection; by 2003 $49.99 pm; later $24. Would I pay $100-200 to access all FTTH offers, inc the world’s TV on my computer (no need for fancy TV sets, “cable TV”, movie hire, newspapers etc etc etc)? Dumb question!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

DeeCee, I&#039;ll second and third that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That the tubes should be made wide enough to allow the grubby proletariat access to all the tools and services that are now the province of the academic elite is an unthinkable situation.<br />
The smell of threatened privilege is wafting across the land.<br />
The hairy palmed wannabe professors we are going to have to learn to share &#8211; get it?<br />
Huggy</p></blockquote>
<p>Lemme at those tools and services; I&#8217;ll buy the wannabes some razors and suck up the stench of threatened privilege. Ahhh! like the odour of a bbq in full flight on a lazy Saturday arvo.</p>
<blockquote><p>As for monthly cost … When Internet was a pup, I paid $750 py for my initial “uncapped” dial-up private internet connection; by 2003 $49.99 pm; later $24. Would I pay $100-200 to access all FTTH offers, inc the world’s TV on my computer (no need for fancy TV sets, “cable TV”, movie hire, newspapers etc etc etc)? Dumb question!</p></blockquote>
<p>DeeCee, I&#8217;ll second and third that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew E</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/04/07/the-structural-separation-weve-always-wanted/#comment-159950</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/04/07/the-structural-separation-weve-always-wanted/#comment-159950</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;... if takeup of wireless broadband continues at its present rate&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Robert, the very premise is absurd, as is the notion that web traffic will remain constant. And of all people who should know better than to scaremonger or rain in the parade, Malcolm &quot;OzEmail&quot; Turnbull is it. &lt;a&gt;More&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230; if takeup of wireless broadband continues at its present rate&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Robert, the very premise is absurd, as is the notion that web traffic will remain constant. And of all people who should know better than to scaremonger or rain in the parade, Malcolm &#8220;OzEmail&#8221; Turnbull is it. <a>More</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

