Casey, is that you know almost nothing about 9/11 and have formed your view based on incidental factors: your antipathy towards your Truther family member, what people in your peer group have told you to think and the fact that one person here claims to have read the NIST reports and I have not.

Again with the truther relo. I’m telling you it’s not him. He would ghost thump you for a start. But what about this peer group? Dead too? How many voices this time? Probably a lot no doubt. We hail from Berlusconia you know.

But listen. You gotsta get over Fyodor and the jealousy. It’s unseemly. So what if he has a printer and you don’t? And what do you mean I know almost nothing? You calling me stupid? Well according to you you porkchop.

I think you’re right about Dagget, Mercurius. Yet another failed attempt at the Turing Test.

Good.

I’ve done some sea voyages Daggett but your one takes the cake.

It’s my business how I choose to inform myself on the question and nobody else’s.

Absolutely not. It is completely my business. Why are you here? To convince all of us here that you speak the truth. I assert that at nearly 2000 comments you have convinced no one.

And what is your response to that?

You a) tell me you don’t need to read it and provide an analogy to Mein Kampf and Nazism and b) then say you have read parts of it, all the while accusing me of not reading you closely enough.

Schizophrenic. You know.

Why should I read you as closely as you would like, if you continue to offend every scholarly bone in my body by not reading the one body of work you need to refute, as a basic start? And how else do you offend my intelligence?

You continue to raise the spectre of Nazism whenever you are up against the wall. Desperation, that way lies.

Further, you cannot admit to reading parts of it as a partial defence. You either read the whole thing or you don’t. You cannot both claim authority from reading parts of it and claim authority from not reading it because it is beneath you.

And anyway, when absolutely pressed what is your excuse? You will not read it on screen? You will not print it out?

Evasions, defence mechanisms not informed by a reasoning intellect but by other psychological spectres all together, no doubt.

Only this remains: You have provided no good reason for not acquainting yourself intimately with its contents. A very basic if you wish to put forward alternate theories as to what really happened.

So what you are telling me then is you do not care if you do not convince anyone, and that you have no wish to be taken seriously at all?

Well who has misled who?

For the record, I am not an anti-Semite as Mercurius’s statements:

I’m sure you’ll find a way to pin it on the Jooooooooz, Dag.

And that’s why you deserve every ounce of spite you’re gonna get, here and elsewhere.

… seemed to imply.

I had not once, as far as I can recall, used the term ‘Jew’ in that thread, until Paul Burns asked:

Do you suppose people who believed in the international Jewish financial conspiracy knew what they were talking about?

I responded:

It’s obvious that there is an international financial conspiracy. How many of those involved in this conspiracy are Jews and how many are not, I can’t say at the moment.

… which, in turn, drew the above response from Mercurius. In any case, my understanding is that Jews, as a group, are over-represented amongst bankers, but as I said, I didn’t even raise that issue in the first place, nor the question of an international Financial conspiracy.

If there is anything more to it than that, please let me know

How I choose to inform myself on the question is my business and nobody else’s. I don’t need to read through the whole of the Warren Commission report to know that it was a cover-up. I don’t need to read the whole of Mein Kampf to know that Nazism is a crock and I don’t need to read the whole of the 9/11 Commission Report and all the NIST reports to know that they are lies.

If others here want to prove that the NIST reports are worth more than the paper they are written on, then it is up to them to do so.

In fact, I have read the parts of the NIST reports and can see that critical parts are garbage. If you had read my posts 1895, 1889 an 1944, and a good many before that, you would know that.