<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Economics Nobel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/10/13/the-economics-nobel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/10/13/the-economics-nobel/</link>
	<description>Life, Culture and Politics from BrisVegas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:51:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anthony nolan</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/10/13/the-economics-nobel/#comment-127286</link>
		<dc:creator>anthony nolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10351#comment-127286</guid>
		<description>Thank heavens. Major recognition that Hardin&#039;s thesis is ahistorical. In England the commons wasn&#039;t lost or overused - it was &#039;enclosed&#039;. The entire neo-liberal economic theory of resolving ecological issues by developing individualised, private property rights over natural resources is based on this misreading by Hardin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank heavens. Major recognition that Hardin&#8217;s thesis is ahistorical. In England the commons wasn&#8217;t lost or overused &#8211; it was &#8216;enclosed&#8217;. The entire neo-liberal economic theory of resolving ecological issues by developing individualised, private property rights over natural resources is based on this misreading by Hardin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ambigulous</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/10/13/the-economics-nobel/#comment-127285</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambigulous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 03:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10351#comment-127285</guid>
		<description>Good on the women, too.

After a (formerly) Australian woman shared the Medicine prize too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good on the women, too.</p>
<p>After a (formerly) Australian woman shared the Medicine prize too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John D</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/10/13/the-economics-nobel/#comment-127284</link>
		<dc:creator>John D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10351#comment-127284</guid>
		<description>It was good to see that the economics Nobel actually went to pragmatic economomists who actually loooked at what worked best under differnt circumstances.  It is a shame that this pragmatic approach hasn&#039;t been used to look for alternatives to ETS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was good to see that the economics Nobel actually went to pragmatic economomists who actually loooked at what worked best under differnt circumstances.  It is a shame that this pragmatic approach hasn&#8217;t been used to look for alternatives to ETS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Jones</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/10/13/the-economics-nobel/#comment-127283</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10351#comment-127283</guid>
		<description>My quick peruse of the blogosphere is that economists of many different flavours are claiming Ostrom as their champion.

All those of an ideological bent are wrong!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My quick peruse of the blogosphere is that economists of many different flavours are claiming Ostrom as their champion.</p>
<p>All those of an ideological bent are wrong!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/10/13/the-economics-nobel/#comment-127282</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10351#comment-127282</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Update&lt;/b&gt;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://chartercities.org/blog/72/skyhooks-versus-cranes-the-nobel-prize-for-elinor-ostrom&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Paul Romer&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Cheers to the Nobel committee for recognizing work on one of the deepest issues in economics. Bravo to the political scientist who showed that she was a better economist than the economic imperialists who can’t tell the difference between assuming and understanding.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Update</b>: <a href="http://chartercities.org/blog/72/skyhooks-versus-cranes-the-nobel-prize-for-elinor-ostrom" rel="nofollow">Paul Romer</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Cheers to the Nobel committee for recognizing work on one of the deepest issues in economics. Bravo to the political scientist who showed that she was a better economist than the economic imperialists who can’t tell the difference between assuming and understanding.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

