<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The future of the ABC and of journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/11/16/the-future-of-the-abc-and-of-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/11/16/the-future-of-the-abc-and-of-journalism/</link>
	<description>Blogging politics, culture, sociology and life from Brisvegas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:53:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FDB</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/11/16/the-future-of-the-abc-and-of-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-837684</link>
		<dc:creator>FDB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10907#comment-837684</guid>
		<description>Frankly, they should have stuck to their guns then. And there&#039;s certainly no excuse at all now. Just laziness and a cultural shift away from letting journalists just fucking journalise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, they should have stuck to their guns then. And there&#8217;s certainly no excuse at all now. Just laziness and a cultural shift away from letting journalists just fucking journalise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Burns</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/11/16/the-future-of-the-abc-and-of-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-837682</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10907#comment-837682</guid>
		<description>And they&#039;re scared shitless what the Libs might do next time they get in, if they don&#039;t tow the RWDB line. Even if it does take 15 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And they&#8217;re scared shitless what the Libs might do next time they get in, if they don&#8217;t tow the RWDB line. Even if it does take 15 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Irving (no relation)</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/11/16/the-future-of-the-abc-and-of-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-837675</link>
		<dc:creator>David Irving (no relation)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10907#comment-837675</guid>
		<description>FDB, I think a lot of the ABC&#039;s problem is that they still haven&#039;t recovered from being cowed by the last govt, and the current make-up of the Board won&#039;t be helping.

It&#039;s as though they still can&#039;t quite believe we&#039;ve had a change of government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FDB, I think a lot of the ABC&#8217;s problem is that they still haven&#8217;t recovered from being cowed by the last govt, and the current make-up of the Board won&#8217;t be helping.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s as though they still can&#8217;t quite believe we&#8217;ve had a change of government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FDB</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/11/16/the-future-of-the-abc-and-of-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-837673</link>
		<dc:creator>FDB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10907#comment-837673</guid>
		<description>I reckon amongst other things they&#039;re just overthinking. Journalistic instinct has gone out the window in favour of constantly second-guessing how their &#039;product&#039; will be recieved and percieved in the broader media, and how the players in this or that story are going to respond, politically, to the coverage.

It&#039;s basically weak, spineless crap from an organisation that used to lead - effortlessly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reckon amongst other things they&#8217;re just overthinking. Journalistic instinct has gone out the window in favour of constantly second-guessing how their &#8216;product&#8217; will be recieved and percieved in the broader media, and how the players in this or that story are going to respond, politically, to the coverage.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s basically weak, spineless crap from an organisation that used to lead &#8211; effortlessly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adrian</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/11/16/the-future-of-the-abc-and-of-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-837671</link>
		<dc:creator>adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10907#comment-837671</guid>
		<description>Whatever you want to bloody well call it the point is that by ommitting certain viewpoints and concentrating on others any news organisation can manipulate what the general public is allowed to see. So we have the current ABC giving regular airing of extreme right views, and relatively little from anything further to the left than centre left at best.

For example, John Pilger whose work is regularly published overseas recently won the Sydney Peace Prize, but listeners to the ABC would have been blissfully unaware of that, while being regularly treated to the rantings of Andrew Bolt and his ilk.
The commercial media cam publish what they like, but we are entitled to expect better from the ABC for obvious reasons. So call it censorship, bias, or whatever you like, but something is rotten in the ABC at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever you want to bloody well call it the point is that by ommitting certain viewpoints and concentrating on others any news organisation can manipulate what the general public is allowed to see. So we have the current ABC giving regular airing of extreme right views, and relatively little from anything further to the left than centre left at best.</p>
<p>For example, John Pilger whose work is regularly published overseas recently won the Sydney Peace Prize, but listeners to the ABC would have been blissfully unaware of that, while being regularly treated to the rantings of Andrew Bolt and his ilk.<br />
The commercial media cam publish what they like, but we are entitled to expect better from the ABC for obvious reasons. So call it censorship, bias, or whatever you like, but something is rotten in the ABC at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FDB</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/11/16/the-future-of-the-abc-and-of-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-837650</link>
		<dc:creator>FDB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10907#comment-837650</guid>
		<description>Daggett, I&#039;m not sure you know what censorship is.

Hint - editorial decisions to focus news and current affairs on certain major players are not it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daggett, I&#8217;m not sure you know what censorship is.</p>
<p>Hint &#8211; editorial decisions to focus news and current affairs on certain major players are not it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daggett</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/11/16/the-future-of-the-abc-and-of-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-837636</link>
		<dc:creator>daggett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10907#comment-837636</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting that &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-837456&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;adrian&lt;/a&gt; has detected a trend of the ABC being biased &lt;em&gt;against&lt;/em&gt; the Federal Labor Government. This deserves further exploration.

We should bear in mind that the ABC has largely become and extension of News Limited with so many current employese of News Limited working for the ABC. Some of this has been documented on &lt;strong&gt;stopmurdoch.blogspot.com&lt;/strong&gt; in the articles &lt;a href=&quot;http://stopmurdoch.blogspot.com/2009/10/concern-growing-over-murdoch.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Concern growing over Murdoch infiltration of ABC&quot;&lt;/a&gt; of 25&#160;Oct&#160;09,&lt;a href=&quot;http://stopmurdoch.blogspot.com/2009/11/abc-answers-question-with-question.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;ABC answers a question with a question&quot;&lt;/a&gt; of 4&#160;Nov&#160;09,&lt;a href=&quot;http://stopmurdoch.blogspot.com/2009/11/riddle-me-this.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Riddle Me This ...&quot;&lt;/a&gt; of 6&#160;Nov&#160;09.

If Uncle Rupert had decided that his Federal Labor glove puppets had exceeded their usefulness to him, it should not be altogether unexpected for the ABC to turn on the Government.

Nevertheless, if true, this would have to be amongst the least of their crimes.  As I have written elsewhere, the Brisbane local ABC radio almost completely censored both the Greens and Independents during the most recetn Queensland state elections.  They blatently promoted the two major parties in spite of the fact that 59% of the electorate was respectively opposed to each of the two major parties.  This was &lt;a href=&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;explicitly stated&lt;/a&gt; in am e-mail to me from Kirsten McLeod of Audience &amp; Consumer Affairs on 10&#160;Jun&#160;09:

&lt;blockquote&gt;The ABC&#039;s approach to election coverage focuses on the Government and official Opposition on the basis that one of the two major parties will ultimately form government and thus represent the principal points of view.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

In fact, there was a realistic chance that the Independents and Greens could have formed the blanace of power, but by blatantly censoring views of independents like myself, even when my views such as my opposition to privatisation represented the overwhelming views of the Queensland public, the ABC changed the outcome of the election.  We can largely thank the ABC for the appalling state of governance in Queensland today.

---

One policy I will be standing on will be to massively increase the funds available to the ABC and to remove from the ABC any influence by media monopolies.  No employee of any of the private media corporations should be allowed to sit on the ABC board.  I will challenge all the candidates I am standing against to at least match this policy.


James Sinnamon
Brisbane Independent for
Truth Democrac, and Economic Justice
Australian Federal Elections, 2010</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting that <a href="#comment-837456" rel="nofollow">adrian</a> has detected a trend of the ABC being biased <em>against</em> the Federal Labor Government. This deserves further exploration.</p>
<p>We should bear in mind that the ABC has largely become and extension of News Limited with so many current employese of News Limited working for the ABC. Some of this has been documented on <strong>stopmurdoch.blogspot.com</strong> in the articles <a href="http://stopmurdoch.blogspot.com/2009/10/concern-growing-over-murdoch.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Concern growing over Murdoch infiltration of ABC&#8221;</a> of 25&nbsp;Oct&nbsp;09,<a href="http://stopmurdoch.blogspot.com/2009/11/abc-answers-question-with-question.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;ABC answers a question with a question&#8221;</a> of 4&nbsp;Nov&nbsp;09,<a href="http://stopmurdoch.blogspot.com/2009/11/riddle-me-this.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Riddle Me This &#8230;&#8221;</a> of 6&nbsp;Nov&nbsp;09.</p>
<p>If Uncle Rupert had decided that his Federal Labor glove puppets had exceeded their usefulness to him, it should not be altogether unexpected for the ABC to turn on the Government.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, if true, this would have to be amongst the least of their crimes.  As I have written elsewhere, the Brisbane local ABC radio almost completely censored both the Greens and Independents during the most recetn Queensland state elections.  They blatently promoted the two major parties in spite of the fact that 59% of the electorate was respectively opposed to each of the two major parties.  This was <a href="" rel="nofollow">explicitly stated</a> in am e-mail to me from Kirsten McLeod of Audience &amp; Consumer Affairs on 10&nbsp;Jun&nbsp;09:</p>
<blockquote><p>The ABC&#8217;s approach to election coverage focuses on the Government and official Opposition on the basis that one of the two major parties will ultimately form government and thus represent the principal points of view.</p></blockquote>
<p>In fact, there was a realistic chance that the Independents and Greens could have formed the blanace of power, but by blatantly censoring views of independents like myself, even when my views such as my opposition to privatisation represented the overwhelming views of the Queensland public, the ABC changed the outcome of the election.  We can largely thank the ABC for the appalling state of governance in Queensland today.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>One policy I will be standing on will be to massively increase the funds available to the ABC and to remove from the ABC any influence by media monopolies.  No employee of any of the private media corporations should be allowed to sit on the ABC board.  I will challenge all the candidates I am standing against to at least match this policy.</p>
<p>James Sinnamon<br />
Brisbane Independent for<br />
Truth Democrac, and Economic Justice<br />
Australian Federal Elections, 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Irving (no relation)</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/11/16/the-future-of-the-abc-and-of-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-837508</link>
		<dc:creator>David Irving (no relation)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10907#comment-837508</guid>
		<description>Bugger. Too long ago, or too far away.

Just my luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bugger. Too long ago, or too far away.</p>
<p>Just my luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adrian</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/11/16/the-future-of-the-abc-and-of-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-837494</link>
		<dc:creator>adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10907#comment-837494</guid>
		<description>Exactly grace@34. It&#039;s a little self perpetuating circle of spin now known as news.
Why over at 702 Alison Carrabine was breathlessly informing us that Rudd was being &#039;disingenuous&#039; at best. Every day, no matter what the topic, she manages to find a negative for the government. ABC News: We interpret, you decide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly grace@34. It&#8217;s a little self perpetuating circle of spin now known as news.<br />
Why over at 702 Alison Carrabine was breathlessly informing us that Rudd was being &#8216;disingenuous&#8217; at best. Every day, no matter what the topic, she manages to find a negative for the government. ABC News: We interpret, you decide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Burns</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/11/16/the-future-of-the-abc-and-of-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-837491</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10907#comment-837491</guid>
		<description>DI (nr) @ 33,
Nero&#039;s Great Palace? Tiberius&#039;s palace on Capri. Probably the Byzantine Palace in Constantinople from time to time.
Mid 18c London? London in the swinging 60s. Hollywood, any day. Heaps of places, mate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DI (nr) @ 33,<br />
Nero&#8217;s Great Palace? Tiberius&#8217;s palace on Capri. Probably the Byzantine Palace in Constantinople from time to time.<br />
Mid 18c London? London in the swinging 60s. Hollywood, any day. Heaps of places, mate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grace pettigrew</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/11/16/the-future-of-the-abc-and-of-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-837478</link>
		<dc:creator>grace pettigrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10907#comment-837478</guid>
		<description>Yes adrian@32, and this morning Michelle Grattan and Fran Kelly had a little chat and agreed that while Rudd was not actually telling &quot;a lie&quot; about the  Oceanic Viking &quot;deal&quot;, it certainly was not as &quot;black and white&quot; as he claimed. 

And bugger me, by midday today, Chrissie Pyne had popped up to say, on the ABC, that it is certainly not as &quot;black and white&quot; as Mr Rudd claims, etc. Well done ABC, inventing those effective little phrases that cut through for the Opposition in the media cycle...

Incidentally, who is actually running this country? Just thought I would ask, while listening to the Opposition telling us how their legislative amendments must be accepted in their entirety before the country is allowed to function. And even then, they might not pass them, just to be spiteful, or something..I thought they lost the last election?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes adrian@32, and this morning Michelle Grattan and Fran Kelly had a little chat and agreed that while Rudd was not actually telling &#8220;a lie&#8221; about the  Oceanic Viking &#8220;deal&#8221;, it certainly was not as &#8220;black and white&#8221; as he claimed. </p>
<p>And bugger me, by midday today, Chrissie Pyne had popped up to say, on the ABC, that it is certainly not as &#8220;black and white&#8221; as Mr Rudd claims, etc. Well done ABC, inventing those effective little phrases that cut through for the Opposition in the media cycle&#8230;</p>
<p>Incidentally, who is actually running this country? Just thought I would ask, while listening to the Opposition telling us how their legislative amendments must be accepted in their entirety before the country is allowed to function. And even then, they might not pass them, just to be spiteful, or something..I thought they lost the last election?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Irving (no relation)</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/11/16/the-future-of-the-abc-and-of-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-837474</link>
		<dc:creator>David Irving (no relation)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10907#comment-837474</guid>
		<description>I think the sycophants are the ones doing the wine-pouring and grape-popping, Paul.

Where do I get a gig as a sybarite, just out of curiosity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the sycophants are the ones doing the wine-pouring and grape-popping, Paul.</p>
<p>Where do I get a gig as a sybarite, just out of curiosity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adrian</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/11/16/the-future-of-the-abc-and-of-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-837456</link>
		<dc:creator>adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10907#comment-837456</guid>
		<description>I thing being &#039;presumptuous&#039; isn&#039;t bad either, although I prefer sycophant.

But who is Marni Cordell, and why is she writing crap such as this:

“The ABC news rooms across the country do a great job of providing fair and balanced daily news. No serious commentator could question their commitment to this or the fact that they do it, in the most part, very well.”

Really it is not so much the inaccuracy of this statement that is quite breathtaking, but the &#039;No serious commentator...&#039; line, that I thought was the preserve of people like Miranda Devine. Why doens&#039;t she just come out and say anybody who disagrees with my assessment is not a serious commentator! 
Such specious arguments!!

And the ABC does NOT provide fair and balanced news. Everyday as I walk to work, I listen to Sydney local radio 9.00am news, and virtually every day it leads its political coverage with a sound bite from an opposition spokesperson, and for the last 4 weeks it has been one topic and one topic only. The government barely gets a look in. Today they even trotted out the ghost of Phillip Ruddock for heaven&#039;s sake! I guess Turnball and Stone were unavailable.

This is consistent, deliberate and unacceptably partial news reporting and if replicated in their other news outlets (it certainly is on-line) grounds for serious action from the government.  

I know Mark Scott is an ex-Liberal Party member and the board is stacked to the hilt with hard right idealogues, but really this is getting beyond a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thing being &#8216;presumptuous&#8217; isn&#8217;t bad either, although I prefer sycophant.</p>
<p>But who is Marni Cordell, and why is she writing crap such as this:</p>
<p>“The ABC news rooms across the country do a great job of providing fair and balanced daily news. No serious commentator could question their commitment to this or the fact that they do it, in the most part, very well.”</p>
<p>Really it is not so much the inaccuracy of this statement that is quite breathtaking, but the &#8216;No serious commentator&#8230;&#8217; line, that I thought was the preserve of people like Miranda Devine. Why doens&#8217;t she just come out and say anybody who disagrees with my assessment is not a serious commentator!<br />
Such specious arguments!!</p>
<p>And the ABC does NOT provide fair and balanced news. Everyday as I walk to work, I listen to Sydney local radio 9.00am news, and virtually every day it leads its political coverage with a sound bite from an opposition spokesperson, and for the last 4 weeks it has been one topic and one topic only. The government barely gets a look in. Today they even trotted out the ghost of Phillip Ruddock for heaven&#8217;s sake! I guess Turnball and Stone were unavailable.</p>
<p>This is consistent, deliberate and unacceptably partial news reporting and if replicated in their other news outlets (it certainly is on-line) grounds for serious action from the government.  </p>
<p>I know Mark Scott is an ex-Liberal Party member and the board is stacked to the hilt with hard right idealogues, but really this is getting beyond a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe2</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/11/16/the-future-of-the-abc-and-of-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-837421</link>
		<dc:creator>joe2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10907#comment-837421</guid>
		<description>Whatever it is, I will go for it, Paul, with bells on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever it is, I will go for it, Paul, with bells on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Burns</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/11/16/the-future-of-the-abc-and-of-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-837420</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10907#comment-837420</guid>
		<description>I thought if you were a sycophant you&#039;d have people what danced around you while you lay back on an opulent Roman purple or bright red couch in a toga, with ruby rings on yer fingers, and a gold band in yer hair, and scented pomades in yer beard, while people poured sweet Mediterranean wines down yer gob and popped juicy grapes in yer mouth, etc, etc. 
Oh, hang on  - that&#039;s a sybarite. Well, I can&#039;t get everything right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought if you were a sycophant you&#8217;d have people what danced around you while you lay back on an opulent Roman purple or bright red couch in a toga, with ruby rings on yer fingers, and a gold band in yer hair, and scented pomades in yer beard, while people poured sweet Mediterranean wines down yer gob and popped juicy grapes in yer mouth, etc, etc.<br />
Oh, hang on  &#8211; that&#8217;s a sybarite. Well, I can&#8217;t get everything right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe2</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/11/16/the-future-of-the-abc-and-of-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-837396</link>
		<dc:creator>joe2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10907#comment-837396</guid>
		<description>You are welcome, Mark. You should have a go at the job left open at Crikey. 
Now will Veronica call me a &quot;sycophant&quot;? I love the word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are welcome, Mark. You should have a go at the job left open at Crikey.<br />
Now will Veronica call me a &#8220;sycophant&#8221;? I love the word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/11/16/the-future-of-the-abc-and-of-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-837368</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10907#comment-837368</guid>
		<description>Thanks, joe2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, joe2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe2</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/11/16/the-future-of-the-abc-and-of-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-837366</link>
		<dc:creator>joe2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10907#comment-837366</guid>
		<description>God knows how you &quot;demean yourself&quot; by declaring an interest in a matter you post on.

And I think we all need to know a lot more about how Aunty is making appointments and that they be made, at least, fairly and transparently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God knows how you &#8220;demean yourself&#8221; by declaring an interest in a matter you post on.</p>
<p>And I think we all need to know a lot more about how Aunty is making appointments and that they be made, at least, fairly and transparently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/11/16/the-future-of-the-abc-and-of-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-837360</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10907#comment-837360</guid>
		<description>And I&#039;ve added a link to your post. It&#039;s good to get a historical dimension, and to remind ourselves exactly what the implications of the corporatised structure of the ABC are. Appreciate reading your well considered thoughts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I&#8217;ve added a link to your post. It&#8217;s good to get a historical dimension, and to remind ourselves exactly what the implications of the corporatised structure of the ABC are. Appreciate reading your well considered thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/11/16/the-future-of-the-abc-and-of-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-837359</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=10907#comment-837359</guid>
		<description>Oh for sure, David_H, I wouldn&#039;t expect to have got the gig when JG had his hat in the ring. No contest! :) Anyway, you&#039;ve just made me &quot;go on about it&quot; again! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh for sure, David_H, I wouldn&#8217;t expect to have got the gig when JG had his hat in the ring. No contest! <img src='http://larvatusprodeo.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Anyway, you&#8217;ve just made me &#8220;go on about it&#8221; again! <img src='http://larvatusprodeo.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
