« profile & posts archive

This author has written 2295 posts for Larvatus Prodeo.

Return to: Homepage | Blog Index

No responses to “Metablogging at Walkley”

  1. tim

    “[LP] now has between 3500 and 5100 unique visitors a day.”

    No, it doesn’t.

  2. Mark

    According to the host’s stats.

    All the different methodologies produce different results. But if we’re going to be picky, the sitemeter counter is regularly going over 3100 now. The “average” shown is since it was installed.

  3. tim

    “The sitemeter counter is regularly going over 3100 now.”

    No, it isn’t. It’s only gone above 3100 twice in the last month.

    “The ‘average’ shown is since it was installed.”

    Incorrect; the average shown by sitemeter refers only to the previous seven days. Your overall average would probably be below 2000.

  4. Mark

    Evidently, I’m not as regular a watcher of it as you are, tim. That was my impression. I don’t check it every day.

    What’s the point? If I installed google analytics, I’d get yet another result. Or the Nielsen counter thingy.

  5. Mark

    Here are the server’s site stats for this month:

    Day Number of visits Pages Hits Bandwidth
    01 Feb 2007 3042 15456 43826 933.98 MB
    02 Feb 2007 4468 20046 52638 1.15 GB
    03 Feb 2007 4051 18329 46325 1.05 GB
    04 Feb 2007 4513 24716 74600 1.50 GB
    05 Feb 2007 5113 26275 72529 1.62 GB
    06 Feb 2007 5419 24430 69175 1.62 GB
    07 Feb 2007 5612 28244 85197 1.86 GB
    08 Feb 2007 5310 26155 73308 1.71 GB
    09 Feb 2007 4454 19061 49452 1.18 GB
    10 Feb 2007 4507 22407 59010 1.35 GB
    11 Feb 2007 5535 26994 85500 1.68 GB
    12 Feb 2007 6444 32457 103212 2.06 GB
    13 Feb 2007 5892 28282 88069 1.79 GB
    14 Feb 2007 5711 25508 78708 1.57 GB
    15 Feb 2007 5399 21698 70290 1.36 GB
    16 Feb 2007 5028 21727 60719 1.24 GB
    17 Feb 2007 4634 18715 51734 1.10 GB
    18 Feb 2007 5723 26250 76837 1.53 GB

  6. Kim

    What’s the point?

    Tim’s hits are bigger than our hits! Probably bigger than my tits! Tim has a big blog! The biggest blog!

    Ok, fine, whatevs, can we actually talk about the issues raised in the piece?

  7. haiku

    But not nearly as nice as your tits, Kimberella. And the latter attract a much more discerning, stylish, polite, and dare I say, lipsnigeringly luscious type of commenter, EIIDSSM.

    If this is a metablogging piece, I guess the field is open to this sort of intervention from timbo. Quick work from 3:39 to 4:15, and still wrong. Hopefully he’ll repeat the error and Tim Lambert can get out the pinata …

  8. Mark

    Update: Gary Sauer-Thompson has a couple of interesting posts on political blogging over at public opinion.

  9. Mark

    EIIDSSM

    ??

  10. haiku

    Even if I do say so myself …

  11. Fiasco da Gama

    Even if he does say so himself, Mark.

  12. Mark

    Innocent Bystander Cab Sav is addling my brain! Apologies…

  13. haiku

    EIFSSAW – Even if Fiasco says so as well

  14. Kim

    EIFTPQRTHITTPDSSAW

  15. Kim

    Translation:

    Even if the Pirate Queen referring to herself in the third person does say so as well…

  16. haiku

    Good name for a wine! Could sit alongside Marilyn Merlot, Cardinal Zin and The Full Montepulciano …

  17. Kim

    Well designed label, too. This is the sangiovese:

    <img src="http://static.flickr.com/41/97454589_046cfa4d2b_m.jpg&quot;

  18. tim

    Kim writes: “Tim’s hits are bigger than our hits! Probably bigger than my tits! Tim has a big blog! The biggest blog!â€?

    Claims such as these are more usually made by Mark Bahnisch, who habitually overstates LP’s readership (for example, once leading Crikey to report that LP was “the country’s best read political blogâ€?).

    Mark is at it again in the Walkley magazine piece, claiming stats that are in some cases nearly double the daily numbers recorded on LP’s public counter. In subsequent comments here he’s claimed an average Sitemeter hit count somewhat in excess of LP’s actual average, and regular above-3100 counts that aren’t regular at all.

    Considering how often Mark mentions LP’s popularity, he might take more care.

  19. Kim

    Yawn, tim.

    I’ve already said your hits are bigger than my tits.

    Mark was going by the host’s stats. What’s your problem with that? Have you done a comparison as to how all the different methods play out? What do your host’s stats say? Is there a reliable method of comparing readership?

    Can we expect a scintillating expose from J F Beck?

  20. Kim

    Anyway, according to the sitemeter thingy, 2837 today. With 10 mins to spare. Of which small t tim is 1.

    Want me to email you the weekly stats report? Just so you don’t inadvertently increase our figures by coming round here to check on them?

  21. Kim

    2844 now. tim is 12246.

    I’m a B Cup.

  22. Mark

    Again. Here are the server’s site stats for this month:

    Day Number of visits Pages Hits Bandwidth
    01 Feb 2007 3042 15456 43826 933.98 MB
    02 Feb 2007 4468 20046 52638 1.15 GB
    03 Feb 2007 4051 18329 46325 1.05 GB
    04 Feb 2007 4513 24716 74600 1.50 GB
    05 Feb 2007 5113 26275 72529 1.62 GB
    06 Feb 2007 5419 24430 69175 1.62 GB
    07 Feb 2007 5612 28244 85197 1.86 GB
    08 Feb 2007 5310 26155 73308 1.71 GB
    09 Feb 2007 4454 19061 49452 1.18 GB
    10 Feb 2007 4507 22407 59010 1.35 GB
    11 Feb 2007 5535 26994 85500 1.68 GB
    12 Feb 2007 6444 32457 103212 2.06 GB
    13 Feb 2007 5892 28282 88069 1.79 GB
    14 Feb 2007 5711 25508 78708 1.57 GB
    15 Feb 2007 5399 21698 70290 1.36 GB
    16 Feb 2007 5028 21727 60719 1.24 GB
    17 Feb 2007 4634 18715 51734 1.10 GB
    18 Feb 2007 5723 26250 76837 1.53 GB

  23. Mark

    Here’s last month’s:

    Day Number of visits Pages Hits Bandwidth
    01 Jan 2007 3735 22532 62776 1.62 GB
    02 Jan 2007 4125 22137 64562 1.44 GB
    03 Jan 2007 4116 21680 65833 1.34 GB
    04 Jan 2007 3973 21682 69244 1.41 GB
    05 Jan 2007 4776 23851 58507 955.35 MB
    06 Jan 2007 5110 22895 51083 938.67 MB
    07 Jan 2007 4206 22851 66693 1.61 GB
    08 Jan 2007 4505 23982 68855 1.70 GB
    09 Jan 2007 4397 21892 62535 1.61 GB
    10 Jan 2007 4542 24908 69731 1.65 GB
    11 Jan 2007 4479 25704 73475 1.97 GB
    12 Jan 2007 3787 19877 52810 1.60 GB
    13 Jan 2007 3555 16253 43921 1.23 GB
    14 Jan 2007 3887 18683 56473 1.30 GB
    15 Jan 2007 4458 26990 75845 1.83 GB
    16 Jan 2007 5158 30950 80376 1.86 GB
    17 Jan 2007 4577 26116 76471 1.89 GB
    18 Jan 2007 4861 27149 85563 2.00 GB
    19 Jan 2007 3935 20974 57451 1.66 GB
    20 Jan 2007 3731 16982 48577 1.27 GB
    21 Jan 2007 4150 20696 66217 1.35 GB
    22 Jan 2007 4642 23647 77240 1.58 GB
    23 Jan 2007 4717 27286 77970 1.81 GB
    24 Jan 2007 4994 28266 85008 1.83 GB
    25 Jan 2007 5183 26461 78925 1.85 GB
    26 Jan 2007 4237 20502 60124 1.48 GB
    27 Jan 2007 4024 20937 52468 1.21 GB
    28 Jan 2007 5130 23466 71357 1.34 GB
    29 Jan 2007 5530 28429 80298 1.69 GB
    30 Jan 2007 5269 28398 78159 1.62 GB
    31 Jan 2007 5048 26560 72524 1.53 GB
    Average 4478.61 23636.65 67453.90 1.55 GB
    Total 138837 732736 2091071 48.14 GB

  24. Tim Lambert

    I think this is a major scandal and I urge Tim B to write fourteen posts on it like he did when Chris Sheil made a speling mistake.

  25. tim

    Kim writes: “Is there a reliable method of comparing readership?”

    Using the same counting method might be a start. But that’s not the issue here, is it? Forget my hits being larger than your tits, Kim; it turns out LP’s bogus hit claims are larger, too.

    LP is the bra-stuffer of Oz blogdom.

  26. tim

    That would be “spelling”, Tim L.

  27. Kim

    Now you’re accusing me of padding my bra, tim?

  28. Kim

    That would be “spellingâ€?, Tim L.

    That would be “irony”, tim b.

  29. Tim Lambert

    It’s like pressing a buton. He can’t help himself…

  30. Kim

    Well, I wonder how many hits he gets from Crete. :)

  31. Bill Posters

    If little tim feels so strongly about it he should contact the mag’s editor and demand a correction.