« profile & posts archive

This author has written 366 posts for Larvatus Prodeo.

Return to: Homepage | Blog Index

10 responses to “Guest post by Andrew Crook: The Grattan Institute – Centre for Ruddist Thinking”

  1. Nana Levu

    I thought Demos people became PerCapita?

  2. Nickws

    A horrified John Roskam of the right-leaning Institute for Public Affairs said last month that he’d be “absolutely amazed if it [Grattan] could accommodate an opinion critical of a Labor government.” He has every reason to be concerned — the IPA, and its ideological bedfellows at the Centre for Independent Studies and Gerard Henderson’s Sydney Institute have been effectively frozen out of the national debate. The idea of Rudd launching a major policy initiative alongside someone like Henderson, as John Howard did with the Intervention, is all but unthinkable

    Before we start congratulating ourselves in the inevitable thirdway-intellectuals-bad, third-way-intellectuals-steal-Labor’s-soul circle jerk, can we at least congratulate the Pseud-in-Chief for making Liberal candidate Roskam and his fellow wingnut welfare recipients feel horrified even as the unions’ think tank bloke expresses hope?

  3. Nickws

    “Can we at least also congratulate the Pseud…” or perhaps, “Can we at least acknowledge the Pseud…”

  4. David Rubie

    Somehow I’m not comforted by the idea of battling the wingnut noise factory/opinion farm/cash for comment collective represented by the IPA with…

    A differently biased noise factory/opinion farm/cash for comment crew.

    I’d be much happier if the government simply donated money to a project like SourceWatch and left it at that. Government departments are supposed to do the heavy lifting of formulating efficient policy to the aims of the current administration, aren’t they? Why else would we have them?

  5. Paul Burns

    Centre-left?

  6. David Rubie

    “Centre-left” is code Paul, for saying “I solemnly promise not to formulate any policies that might be even slightly seen as socialist, please don’t feed me to Piers Akerman, he looks hungry again”.

  7. Paul Burns

    Ah! But they are feeding the poor. Sort of. :)

  8. Mercurius

    Ooh, ooh, does every columnist get a think-tank named after them?

    Here are the latest fact-related issues being investigated at…

    The Bolt Institute – Mock indignation: Best laid on with a trowel or a shovel?

    The Blair Initiative – The effects of placing one hand under opposite armpit and making rapid chicken-wing movements with said arm.

    The Akerman Foundation – Marginal effectiveness of checking under the bed twice a day vs. three times.

    The Milne Project – Optimum number of hands required to locate backside.

    The Shanahan Centre – 50 different ways with irrelevance.

  9. Leon

    as if facts are ideologically neutral

    Though their selection from among other facts might not be, facts are — or at least, if your ideology is in good order, should be — ideologically neutral.

  10. Dave Bath

    For those who don’t know, Melbourne University is on Grattan Street.

    It’s probable that the institute’s publications will be less perceptive than Michelle’s. They’ll certainly be less amusing!