[Insert joke about Family First's alleged approach to the Sex Party here]
By tigtog on July 28, 2010
[Insert joke about Family First's alleged approach to the Sex Party here]
Posted in federal election 2010, Levity | Tagged gobsmacked | 10 Responses
This author has written 618 posts for Larvatus Prodeo.
Larvatus Prodeo was an Australian group blog which discussed politics, sociology, culture, life, religion and science from a left of centre perspective. more»
Copyright © 2005-2012 Larvatus Prodeo.
Powered by WordPress and Hybrid LPNews. Hosted by Ozblogistan. Customised by VIVidWeb.
Don’t need to make to make a joke.
According to the News Ltd site (yes, I know),
“I suppose an uncivil union after a back room preference deal is out of the question then?”
“Yes it is. We won’t play second preference to anyone”.
And Xenophon again:
Like climate change Sen Field’s approach to the sex party is his need to see both sides front and back before expressing a preference.
I think Tones and Mrs Tones should get a piece of this action.
Seems Fielding has put himself in a contraceptionary position.
Makes perfect sense. Aren’t they both for net censorship?
Is this is a fiskal policy or a physical policy?
I can just imagine Family Fist sidling up to the Sex Party … hoping for an invitation …
Seems this arose out of Fielding wanring to know who The Sex Party were preferencing so he could put them last on his Senate ticket, really. The Earthworm Strikes Again!