Let’s take a little look at how the “political narrative” works.
The beauty of Twitter, for poll watchers, is that a mysterious entity dubbed “Ghost Who Votes” somehow or other tweets the Newspoll figures before they’re released. Tomorrow’s poll, we are told, and the Ghost always speaks true, will show a recovery in Labor’s vote. We’re back at 52-48 in favour of the Coalition. Julia Gillard back in front of T. Abbott, MHR.
Yet, tonight, Lateline is apparently oblivious to the need to recompose the narrative. Labor was brutally defeated in Western Australia (Stephen Smith’s assessment was that the ALP had a good chance to rebuild, and indeed, had been exactly in the position it now is in at the election before Geoff Gallop won). Labor is on the ropes, etc. Brand damaged!
Maybe the Guest Tweeter is not chasing Ghosts.
Now, polls are not Truth. They’re a snapshot of the past, a past take on how a representative sample answered a hypothetical question – posed in terms of how people might vote were an election held today.
But they apparently are the key tropes of the Narrative.
It reminds me of Dark City. We’re all John Murdoch now. (Oh, the irony.)
So, as we launch into election year, let’s talk Narratology. There’s got to be a teleology, hasn’t there? It’s as if the cracks in the story, the switch points where everything might change, are erased before they can signify.
That’s me coming over all Deconstructionist.
Here’s a challenge. How could we tell this story otherwise? And what is the New New Narrative?
The narrative continues through the inclusion of hypothetical questions about what voting intention were Kevin Rudd leader and preferred Labor leader:
https://twitter.com/GhostWhoVotes/status/311100769749307392
Wouldn’t a Narrative be the problem? If I wanted a Narrative, I’d watch WWE wrestling.
Oh, how I agree, Kim. It is hard watch those programmes now because all they do is misinform. You would think they could do better in this digital age! Once again, three cheers for LP.
Thanks, Alison
“We’re back at 52-48 in favour of the Coalition.”
We’ve been back at 52-48 several times before haven’t we. I wouldn’t get too excited.
We need more Nate Silver’s and less confected Narratives from self appointed sages.
If the only displacement for a media narrative is another narrative, how do we supply the drama the media requires? Where’s the story arc going?