As Kevin Rudd joined Gordon Brown in decrying “the false god” of “unfettered free markets” in London’s St Paul’s Cathedral, Janet Albrechtsen got her apoplexy in early, lamenting the fact that Kevin Rudd doesn’t read Hayek (apparently Ayaan Hirsi Ali has offered to tutor the Prime Minister in the guru of “economics and the rule of law”).
Albrechtsen tied herself in a series of knots trying to find the “gotcha” moment in Rudd’s ideological discourse. In point of fact, it’s quite possible to reconcile fiscal conservatism with being a social democrat, but the Hayek worshippers seem stuck in an age when there was supposedly a slippery slope between any view that markets are social institutions and socialism itself.
Here, it’s perhaps interesting that Gordon Brown chose to invoke Adam Smith on several occasions, a thinker to whom the authors of Hayekian dribble pay only occasional and meaningless obeisance:
Now, let me put markets in context. They can create unrivalled widening of choices and chances, harnessing self-interest to produce results transcending self-interest. When they work, they will fulfil the promise of Adam Smith that individual gain leads to collective gain, that even when people are pursuing private interests and private wishes they can nevertheless deliver public good.
But as we are discovering to our considerable cost, the problem is that, without transparent rules to guide them, free markets can reduce all relationships to transactions, all motivations to self-interest; as Jonathan Sacks has said, they can reduce all sense of value to consumer choice, all sense of worth to a price tag. So, unbridled and untrammelled, they can become the enemy of the good society.
And we can now see also that markets cannot self-regulate, but they can self-destruct and, again, if untrammelled and unbridled, they can become not just the enemy of the good society; they can become the enemy of the good economy. Markets are in the public interest but they are not synonymous with it.
Gordon Brown, a former university lecturer with a History PhD from Edinburgh, perhaps has a better claim to public intellectual status than Kevin Rudd. His whole speech is worth a read, and the full text is here (as is Rudd’s). Continue reading ‘Kevin Rudd, Gordon Brown, Adam Smith and free markets’

Recent comments
Ootz, desipis, John D, Fran Barlow, paul of albury, j_p_z [...]
David Irving (no relation), Deborah, David Irving (no relation), Pavlov's Cat, Deborah, Pavlov's Cat [...]
John D, HuggyBunny, Chris, Tim Macknay, carbonsink, Elise [...]
Quoll, David Irving (no relation), Wood Duck, David Irving (no relation), Mark, josh [...]
Ginja, GregM, PD41, Enemy Combatant, Matilda, Mercurius [...]
Frankie V., armagny, sg, Robert Merkel, wilful
Helen, Laura, conrad, murph the surf., Chris, conrad [...]
Caroline Church, Fran Barlow, Sam, Jenny, Sam, Kim [...]
Liam, anthony nolan, pablo, Ute Man, Col. Douglas C. Niedermeyer, Mindy [...]
David Irving (no relation), Roger Jones, David Irving (no relation), Elise, Paul Norton, Gummo Trotsky [...]
Kim, paul walter, Saint Furious of Ikea, Jacques de Molay, Fascinated, Deborah [...]
Helen, Kim, Helen, David Irving (no relation), Sam, Helen [...]