Ken Parish has an excellent post at Club Troppo about the excessive reach of the “anti-bikie” laws recently enacted by several state parliaments. The powers, and the lack of safeguards on using them, provided by the laws are akin to the excesses of the anti-terrorism legislation (incidentally, when is sedition going to be taken off the books, Kevin Rudd?)
Amongst other things, this act permits “eligible judges” (hand-picked by the Attorney-General of the day) to proscribe organizations based on evidence which is not disclosed to either defendants or their lawyers.
I don’t have anything to add other than thanking Ken for drawing this to our attention. Why is it that every time we turn our backs on them, police forces are forever trying to acquire more powers, and supine governments are all too eager to hand such powers to them?

Recent comments
Martin B, Sam, Lefty E, Mark, Paul Burns, PinkyOz [...]
David Irving (no relation), Saint Furious of Ikea, joe2, Zorronsky, Liam, el oso [...]
jules, anthony nolan, jules, anthony nolan, Legal Eagle, jules [...]
Saint Furious of Ikea, John D, joe2, Jamo
Ville, joe2, Mercurius, Kersebleptes, adrian, Marilyn Shepherd [...]
Darryl Rosin, Sam, Paul Norton, Sam, Paul Norton, anthony nolan [...]
Robert Merkel, Kiashu, Fran Barlow, Robert Merkel, Kiashu, Mervyn Langford [...]
informally yours, Saint Furious of Ikea, informally yours, Chris, informally yours, Saint Furious of Ikea [...]
rumrebellious, RightHandThread, Nabakov, rumrebellious, Nabakov, RightHandThread [...]
Mark, Saint Furious of Ikea, Luke Walladge, Mark, Paul Burns, Bert [...]
Paul Burns, Fran Barlow, CMMC, Gummo Trotsky, Guido, pablo [...]
BilB, Peter, BilB, OldSkeptic, anthony nolan, mitchell porter [...]