They’re at it again:
Members of the Liberal Party have been creating a minor storm about the matter of Indigenous recognition. In statements made to the Adelaide Advertiser yesterday, Opposition Leader Tony Abbott implied that formal recognition of traditional owners at the beginning of significant events is superficial and unnecessary. ‘I guess this is the kind of genuflection to political correctness that [Labor ministers] feel they have to make’ he said. ‘Sometimes it’s appropriate to do those things, but certainly I think in many contexts it seems like out-of-place tokenism.’ Liberal backbencher Wilson Tuckey weighed in a few hours later, claiming such recognition was a ‘farce’, while Senator Eric Abetz called it ‘outdated’ and a ‘fad’.
One of the more eye-opening things to come out of this, for me, was learning on Q&A that the soporific Peter Dutton had actually offered his resignation to Brendan Nelson, so strong did he feel about not attending the Apology.
These sorts of culture war debates are, of course, plagued by false dichotomies. They’re also plagued by sneaky elisions of meaning – if something is ’superficial’, that doesn’t imply that it is ‘unnecessary’, but rather that the meaning embodied in the words should provoke thought, stimulate reflection, change minds, incite action. To that degree, there’s a sort of validity in the criticism, as Stephanie Convery says, but not of the sort that Abbott and co. think:
But the problem is not in the act of formal recognition but in the assumption that lip service is all there is to it. The truth is, there is a disconnect between political symbolism and action on Indigenous issues in Australia. The recognition of traditional owners, the welcome to country, is essential if only because it draws attention to this disconnect. It reminds the non-Indigenous listener of the fact of their colonial heritage, of the continued existence of Indigenous people and culture, and their direct relationship to everyone who calls themselves Australian. Or at least, it should.
Continue reading ‘Acknowledgement of country ‘culture wars’’

Recent comments
Nabakov, Nabakov, Nabakov, Nabakov, Paul Burns, Paul Burns [...]
SJ, Nickws, Down and Out of Sài Gòn, Zorronsky, Enemy Combatant, SJ [...]
Idiot/Savant, Lefty E, Andrew Bartlett, Razor, Andrew Bartlett, Lefty E [...]
Nabakov, Danny, Fran Barlow, Jacques Chester, John D, HuggyBunny [...]
Fine, Nabakov, Snorky, Gummo Trotsky, Ville, joe2 [...]
Saint Furious of Ikea, Nabakov, Nabakov, Pavlov's Cat, Luke Walladge, Luke Walladge [...]
Nabakov, anthony nolan, jules, anthony nolan, jules, anthony nolan [...]
Andyc, David Irving (no relation), Saint Furious of Ikea, joe2, Zorronsky, Liam [...]
Fran Barlow, Darryl Rosin, Sam, Paul Norton, Sam, Paul Norton [...]
Martin B, Sam, Lefty E, Mark, Paul Burns, PinkyOz [...]
Robert Merkel, Kiashu, Fran Barlow, Robert Merkel, Kiashu, Mervyn Langford [...]
informally yours, Saint Furious of Ikea, informally yours, Chris, informally yours, Saint Furious of Ikea [...]