Tag Archive for 'free speech'

Australian sitting in Thai jail for writing novel

From what I’ve heard, the reverence that Thais feel for their monarch is genuine and heartfelt in the vast majority of cases. But it’s also protected by a draconian law of lese majeste; as the Wikipedia explains, the crime of insulting the king has been used against several politicians and human rights activists. Now, an Australian has been caught by the law:

The family of an Australian writer facing 15 years in jail for allegedly defaming Thailand’s crown prince have appealed to Canberra to intercede after he was refused bail for a second time, his lawyer said. Mark Dean, a Melbourne-based lawyer for 41-year-old Harry Nicolaides, said judges at Bangkok’s Criminal Court deemed it to be a “very serious offence” and regarded him as a flight risk. “His family is very concerned about his welfare,” Mr Dean said.

His relatives had written to Thailand’s royal household, Mr Dean said, apologising for any offence caused by his 2005 novel Verisimilitude, billed on the phuket-info.com website as an “uncompromising assault on the patrician values of the monarchy”.

Continue reading ‘Australian sitting in Thai jail for writing novel’

Possum fights back

Possum isn’t going to take being dissed by Christian Kerr and the “balance and fact” crew at The Australian lying down:

Update [by Mark]: Jason Wilson at Gatewatching espies a tipping point in the Australian political blogosphere.

Christian Kerr troll blogging at The Australian

Yep, Christian Kerr is talking about us. Among others. Guess what, we’re smug, ill informed, prone to conspiracy theories, full of hatred for the noble profession of journalism, divorced from the real world, an echo chamber, too academic, etc, etc. But he couldn’t possibly tell his readers which “certain blog” he’s talking about. Lord no. Even though there is a direct quote from a post at LP. People might come here and make up their own mind. So the impression is left that bloggers are bad and as far as Kerr is concerned, that’s all anyone needs to know. Yet he provides “balance and fact”. Obviously. Btw, you can’t comment on his article. And if you disagree with him here, you just go into the “ill informed” pile, I guess. The irony that he’s ostensibly writing about free speech seems to have escaped him.

Anyway, he was baiting for a link. He’s got one. I hope he’s happy now.

Update: [by Kim] More from tigtog at Hoyden.

Is criticism of World Youth Day automatically Catholic bashing?

It’s no secret that “the sectarian strand” is one of the less attractive aspects of Australian history, and interestingly, probably not one featured highly either in the so-called “black armband” or triumphalist narratives so beloved of our home grown Antipodean culture warriors. That may be because the deep cleavages - overlapping but not identical to class and ethnicity - around Catholicism and Protestantism needed to be elided and to be buried in order to construct the “Anglo-Celtic” identity which came into its own at the same time that the state aid controversy was settled into its grave and multiculturalism launched on its career. And not coincidentally. “Anglos” and “Celts” were on different sides of the political and cultural coin in the Great Southern Land of the Holy Spirit for most of its whitefella history. In a way, Gough Whitlam is probably the progenitor of the “mainstream” Anglo-Celtic Australian. But sectarianism typically rears its head as a defensive accusation whenever the Catholic Church is particularly prominent in public debate, and whenever criticism is directed at the Church’s institutional power.

In the context of World Youth Day in Sydney this week, this accusation has been levelled both with regard to criticism of the extraordinary powers granted to police by Greg Craven and with regard to the ABC’s highlighting of Cardinal George Pell’s ethically very questionable handling of clergy sexual abuse complaints by Andrew Bolt. More broadly, the media sponsors of World Youth Day at News Limited have worked themselves into a lather of holy righteousness, denouncing “aggressive secularism” and lauding all the Popey goodness they’re sponsoring - without disclosing that sponsorship in their journalistic or opinion pieces.

It may well be that a residue of sectarian anti-Catholicism might be in play on the margins of all this, but one of the big ironies is that while Tony Abbott and others speculated that Pope Benedict’s message might not be communicated effectively, the Pope himself has seemingly become a football to be kicked around by the usual suspects in distinctly Australian culture wars which often have only a tenuous connection with his concerns. But are there not genuine issues - of public interest - that can and should be raised at a time when Catholicism is top of the pops in the media stakes?

Continue reading ‘Is criticism of World Youth Day automatically Catholic bashing?’