As a conclusion to his series provoked by The Australian’s “What’s Left” op/ed fest, Guy Rundle has proposed a positive vision of the future from the left. [For my previous LP posts on this theme, see here.]
I’ll post the whole piece over the fold (with permission), but I want to zero in on this point and add a few of my own thoughts:
Clearly many of us have assumed too much in focusing on critical accounts of the contemporary world, and not enough of alternative visions…
Read that together with another observation:
Would a transformed post-capitalist economic and social system abolish money, markets and property? Of course not. These things pre-date capitalism and will continue after it. Capitalism is the system and the era when these things dominate not only the way we produce our lives, but also the way in which we think about ourselves and our world.
It’s precisely, I think, because a certain blockage to thought has now fractured with the Global Financial Crisis’ destruction of the legitimacy of ideological capital (and Slavoj Žižek may be right that this is the second ‘end of history’; the first being the implosion of Soviet Marxism), that we can begin to think a future outside the “no alternatives” terrain of both neo-liberalism and its anodyne Third way echoes. The term “social democracy”, in and of itself, doesn’t imply an economistic orientation, and it should not. What we’re actually seeing, I would argue (and more on this later), is a return of suppressed conceptions of value and values in the popular mind, which create the building blocks on which a vision of the future can be scaffolded, even if the foundation must rest on shards.
In short, and this was a theme of my doctoral thesis, what we need to do – collectively – is to revive our ability to imagine life otherwise. That works better if we allow critique its place – to render what appears natural strange – but also if we ground our thoughts of the future in what we can see around us, and orient our presents to a future hope. A certain utopian sensibility is required – but one which is open to the invention of utopias in a plural and a minor key.
Continue reading ‘Left futures’

Recent comments
David Irving (no relation), Deborah, David Irving (no relation), Pavlov's Cat, Deborah, Pavlov's Cat [...]
John D, HuggyBunny, Chris, Tim Macknay, carbonsink, Elise [...]
desipis, John D, Fran Barlow, paul of albury, j_p_z, Fascinated [...]
Quoll, David Irving (no relation), Wood Duck, David Irving (no relation), Mark, josh [...]
Ginja, GregM, PD41, Enemy Combatant, Matilda, Mercurius [...]
Frankie V., armagny, sg, Robert Merkel, wilful
Helen, Laura, conrad, murph the surf., Chris, conrad [...]
Caroline Church, Fran Barlow, Sam, Jenny, Sam, Kim [...]
Liam, anthony nolan, pablo, Ute Man, Col. Douglas C. Niedermeyer, Mindy [...]
David Irving (no relation), Roger Jones, David Irving (no relation), Elise, Paul Norton, Gummo Trotsky [...]
Kim, paul walter, Saint Furious of Ikea, Jacques de Molay, Fascinated, Deborah [...]
Helen, Kim, Helen, David Irving (no relation), Sam, Helen [...]