<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Larvatus Prodeo &#187; harmonisation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://larvatusprodeo.net/tag/harmonisation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net</link>
	<description>Life, Culture and Politics from BrisVegas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:09:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Harmonisation&quot;?  Or callous restriction?</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/05/31/harmonisation-or-callous-restriction/</link>
		<comments>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/05/31/harmonisation-or-callous-restriction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 14:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tigtog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disabled parking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harmonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/05/31/harmonisation-or-callous-restriction/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My co-blogger at Hoyden About Town, lauredhel, has written a post about the proposed national disabled parking scheme (to have a uniform standard between the states): CALL TO ACTIVISM &#8211; Many people with disabilities to be excluded from accessible parking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My co-blogger at Hoyden About Town, lauredhel, has written a post about the proposed national disabled parking scheme (to have a uniform standard between the states):</p>
<p><a href="http://viv.id.au/blog/20090530.5122/call-to-activism-many-people-with-disabilities-to-be-excluded-from-accessible-parking-under-proposed-scheme/">CALL TO ACTIVISM &#8211; Many people with disabilities to be excluded from accessible parking under proposed scheme</a></p>
<p>For an examination of the details, see her post: the main point is that there is a significant population of legitimately disabled people who don&#8217;t fulfil the suggested major criterion of &#8220;walking without physical assistance from another person&#8221; (sticks/canes will no longer count, apparently).</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Who does this exclude? Everyone who walks, <em>with or without a cane</em>, and who does not require the <em>physical assistance</em> of another person.</p>
<p>Every single independent person with an invisible disability.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>What, it doesn&#8217;t matter how restricted their independent walking distance is by an invisible medical condition?.  Even for the visible disabilities, most amputees (including military veterans) and most stroke victims won&#8217;t qualify under the new rules.</p>
<p> As for the invisible disabilities?<br />
Tough luck for the chronic asthmatics and the emphysematous.<br />
Tough luck for most people undergoing chemotherapy for cancer.<br />
Tough luck for many people with Multiple Sclerosis or Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>These rules will disable me, and many thousands of Australians like me.</p>
<p>These rules will create physical dependence.</strong><br />
 <span id="more-8444"></span></p>
<p>Way to go, Disability Office. “Improving the lives of Australians” by making them more dependent and limiting their opportunities to participate in community life? No thanks.</p>
<p>If anyone can help with drawing up a form letter, please do &#8211; but meanwhile, you can print out the feedback form and fill it in, describing these concerns with the eligibility criteria. <a href="http://www.fahcsia.gov.au/sa/disability/progserv/people/disability_parking_scheme/parking_scheme_discussion_paper/Documents/disability_parking_scheme/parking_scheme_discussion_paper.PDF">Give them your feedback.</a> Right now. Please. If you have the time and spoons, please <a href="http://www.fahcsia.gov.au/sa/disability/progserv/people/disability_parking_scheme/Pages/default.aspx">attend a public information session</a> (RSVP required) and give your feedback.</p>
<p>Independent people with invisible disabilities need to be able to remain independent. We need to fix this.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/05/31/harmonisation-or-callous-restriction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

