Tag Archive for 'Higgins'

Propositions on the Liberal right week of FAIL

Let’s sum up a few things about the CPRS/leadership shenanigans:

(a) It’s been intriguing to see the focus of political discussion narrow to the Parliamentary dramatics. Journalists – and one suspects, many Liberal MPs – appear to have completely lost sight of the effect that Turnbull’s stand might be having on the public. I’d be very surprised if there isn’t a lot of sympathy for him and his position. Yet those normally obsessed with Newspoll now equate politics with a bunch of lunatics gathered in Nick Minchin’s office, rather than even stopping to think about how all this might be playing with voters. I wonder whether Newspoll will be asking questions about the Liberal leadership this weekend – its owners might not like the answers;

(b) The Liberal Right have shown themselves to be completely unelectable crazies. Liberals are not Republicans and Australia is not America. This appears to be news to some, and it’s hard to know why;

(c) Conversely, text messages and phone calls and emails from Liberal party members and Andrew Bolt’s followers do not equate to a shift in public opinion. The Libs’ only chance of being an effective opposition, and gathering votes in the centre, is to go with Turnbull’s position. The much vaunted ‘base’ will not vote Labor in a pink fit, and a stack of Liberal seats would be at risk if a Leader is elected who is a reactionary on Howard era issues such as climate change denialism and industrial relations. That was clear enough from Kevin Andrews’ press conference where most questions were about the past, and his right wing stance. This is John Howard’s poisonous legacy to his party;

(d) Talk of Turnbull’s ‘management style’ is merely code for the Liberal right refusing to be led by one not of their own. ‘Consultation’ means caving in to dinosaurs. Who’s really the arrogant one in this equation? More likely to be Nick Minchin and his mates;

(e) If Turnbull is toppled tomorrow or on Monday, and leaves Parliament, who really believes an Abbott led Liberal Party would retain Wentworth in a by-election? This is the craziness – Members like Michael Johnson in Ryan calling for Turnbull’s ousting while holding a ‘leafy’ and very marginal seat which has many moderate Liberal voters. It’s not the only one. Kelly O’Dwyer in Higgins, for instance, is going to face a lot of pressure to take a stand on climate change and the ETS in the lead up to the by-election for Peter Costello’s former seat. The Liberals’ actual base is multiple and plural, and they can’t hold it by playing only to the revanchists.

Update: Turnbull’s press conference is now on YouTube.

Elsewhere: Politically Homeless.

Elsewhere: Club Troppo, The Stump.

Update: Fresh post – Abbott will stand for the leadership on Monday.

Green on The Greens in Higgins II

My previous post on Clive Hamilton’s selection as The Greens’ candidate in the Higgins by-election has sparked a thread largely devoted to Hamilton’s views and suitability as a candidate, rather than the party’s electoral chances, or indeed, the strategy of using the by-election to highlight climate change as an issue. That sorta proves my point about the lack of wisdom – whatever one thinks of Hamilton – in selecting a controversial, high profile candidate (… though presumably, it will enable The Greens to make an argument that national or global issues trumped local issues – should he do well, that is).

While Possum appeared to believe that The Greens had a shot at Higgins (and blew it with the preselection of Hamilton), Antony Green is much more sceptical. In a new post on his election blog, Green highlights historical data demonstrating that the margin in Higgins somewhat belies how safe the seat probably is in reality. He also argues, on the basis of a number of federal and state by-elections, that a prominent local may well have been a better pick, a point I also made in my post.

In both Cunningham and Fremantle, the Greens ran candidates with local credentials who could concentrate on local issues, classic think global act local politics. Yet in Higgins the Greens have done the reverse, choosing a candidate who lives in Canberra and has no links to the electorate, and is running on a climate change agenda that can only be described as act global politics. It is the exact opposite of a previously successful Green strategy.

Clive Hamilton and Higgins

The Greens are running Clive Hamilton in Higgins.

As Andrew Norton observes, Hamilton criticising seems to be a politically ecumenical practice in the blogosphere.

Guy Rundle puts a contrary view.

I’m by no means enamoured of some of the ideas Hamilton has put forward over the years, but I don’t know that judging him on that basis is necessarily the most appropriate mode of evaluating his prospects as a political representative. I was also struck by Guy Beres‘ comment:

It’s all a bit incestuous when you think about it. The Greens famously courted Peter Garrett on numerous occasions before his controversial decision during the (pre-explosion) Latham era to join the Labor Party. In years past, high-profile players within the Labor Party organisation seriously entertained the idea of Malcolm Turnbull joining the ALP’s ranks. One does wonder whether Clive Hamilton would be considered an asset as a candidate by the Labor Party. Clearly his strong views on the nature of modern capitalism, climate change and stringent opposition to nuclear power paint him as more of a natural Greens candidate. Leaving aside the much debated travails of Peter Garrett for a moment, just what sort of impact could a few high-profile leftish intellectuals have on the parliamentary Labor party?

My other observation would be that I’m not sure that high profile candidates necessarily fare better in by-elections, where the name of the game isn’t really to attract national media attention, but grass roots campaigning on the ground. I have no knowledge of the degree to which Hamilton has or has not been involved in community politics and campaigning on a local level in the suburbs encompassed by Higgins, but my general view would be that such a candidate would be a good bet for an increased vote. In light of the commentary around the Higgins by-election as a barometer on climate change policy, The Greens might have been thinking that’s the better tack to take.

It’s going to be an interesting contest, whichever way it pans out.

Previously on LP: A couple of earlier posts on the Higgins contest.

Update: Legal Eagle.

Update: Hamilton on Hamilton.

Update: En Passant.

Update: Since this post has largely focused on Hamilton rather than electoral strategy and the likely outcomes in Higgins, I’ve put up a new one on that topic, linking to a recent analysis from Antony Green.

Green on The Greens and Higgins

ABC election analyst Antony Green has a very interesting and comprehensive post up on the Higgins (and Bradfield) by-elections.

Among his observations:

Safe Liberal seats in Melbourne have never been as safe as the safest Liberal seats in Sydney. In Sydney the price of desirable land with trees and a view plays an important part in sieving people by class. Without the complex geography of hills, plains and harbour shores, Melbourne’s suburbs have always showed more class mixing than Sydney.

Green doesn’t believe Labor will run a candidate. I think he’s probably right, and the clue as to why is disclosed in another of his comments:

The Greens will nominate and poll well in the absence of a Labor candidate. The problem for the Liberal Party in both Bradfield and Higgins is to try and avoid an adverse swing. The Greens will campaign on the need for climate change action, so a swing to the Greens at either by-election would raise pressure on the Liberal Party during Senate debate on the government’s emission trading legislation.

Any swing would allow the Greens to argue the public wants more action on emissions than the government is offering. But it would also allow the government to argue the Liberal Party should at least back the government’s legislation.

Go; and smirk no more

A long serving Liberal party backbencher indicated today that he will not be renominating for the next Parliament.

A very Costello Christmas

It’s started again.

“The business community in Melbourne has been hugely disappointed by Turnbull’s performance to date,” said a senior Melbourne business source.

“His failure to develop any sort of consistent message has to be addressed quickly.”

The unspoken view at the function was that Mr Costello must wait around for a time when Mr Turnbull’s leadership falls.

The source said the atmosphere among Liberals in Victoria resembled that in July or August this year, when Brendan Nelson’s leadership was in a terminal state, and Mr Costello was under pressure to stay on to lead the party.

However, Mr Costello — whose office declined to comment — has not told even close supporters what his intentions are.