Tag Archive for 'Natasha Stott-Despoja'

Progressing the Senate

There’s a greater focus on the role of the Senate since the Howard Government gained control of both Houses. That’s a very good thing, and let’s hope it continues.

Most of the Senate focus has been on the importance of minor parties who will keep the majors honest. This argument often assumes that a vote for the major parties is a second-best option. But as with everything in politics, there are pros and cons to every decision, and there are some very good reasons for supporting the Labor party in the Senate, too – or more importantly, there are very good reasons for voting more progressive Labor MPs into the Caucus. So here’s why I’m going to be voting Labor in the Senate in WA, and why I think you should too.

Continue reading ‘Progressing the Senate’

A great woman

South Australian Liberal Senator Jeannie Ferris has died in a Canberra hospital after a battle with cancer.

Senator Ferris was diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2005 and had been receiving treatment at the Canberra Hospital for the past several weeks.

(…)

Democrats Senator Natasha Stott-Despoja says Senator Ferris will be greatly missed in the halls of parliament and beyond.

“For many of us we’ve lost a dear, dear friend and colleague.

“Her work particularly in recent times on cross-party women’s work, her establishment of an ovarian cancer research facility, her work on stem cells, her work as whip, all of these are part of her proud legacy.”

Senator Ferris was indeed a great friend to women, and was very involved in all of the most prominent examples of cross-party co-operation over the last couple of years. She genuinely cared about these issues, and fought hard for them - even against the anti-women and anti-science forces in her own party in a government-controlled Senate.

Vale, Jeannie Ferris.

Democrats on the comeback trail?

From today’s Crikey email:

One aspect of the Victorian result that hasn’t attracted any comment is the implications for the Democrats federally. Except in the blogosphere. Graham Young at Ambit Gambit believes that the Greens failed to capture the protest vote to the greatest extent possible, and that their static vote might presage better things for the Democrats in the federal poll next year than pundits are crediting.

Analysis of the minor parties vote in the Victorian election has been muddied by spin. Family First and the Greens are both keen to claim that the results prove they’ve either consolidated their position or arrived on the scene as a force to be reckoned with.

While the Democrats ran candidates, unlike in the Queensland election, they effectively ran dead. They’re harnessing their remaining enthusiasm and resources for the fight to re-elect their Senators next year.

Long term governments, such as Bracks’s in Victoria and Beattie’s in Queensland, inevitably disappoint some of their own supporters. In the context of a lacklustre opposition, not only disillusioned Labor voters but also swinging voters who have no time for the alternative government look for a vehicle for protest.

Continue reading ‘Democrats on the comeback trail?’

Political links post

A quick couple of links to online articles covering issues also discussed on LP recently.

Andrew Norton turns a sceptical eye on the methodology of polls on the Victorian election, while Russ Degnan deconstructs Bracks’ policies on water.

Over at Online Opinion, Andrew Bartlett argues against the contention that Natasha Stott-Despoja’s departure is the last “nail in the coffin” for the Democrats.

Update: Jason writes about the latest career move of erstwhile blogger and legal academic James McConvill at Catallaxy.

Whither the Senate?

Natasha Stott-Despoja has announced that she won’t be re-nominating for election for another term. Senator Stott-Despoya has recently suffered an ectopic pregnancy, and has taken the time to reassess her priorities.

I doubt I’m the only person of my age who has viewed Senator Stott-Despoja as an inspiration, but I am sure that whatever she chooses to do, she will do it very well. If she is successful in achieving changes to stem-cell research laws, then this will be a lasting legacy that she should be extremely proud of.

For politics-watchers, though, I think the biggest question is what this will do for the Democrats vote. She is certainly their most high profile member (although arguably within the blogosphere this honour goes to Senator Bartlett…) and without her, the fight to retain Federal Democrat Senators is going to be even tougher than they imagined.

While my politics are to the left, I just cannot see the Greens taking on the role that was played so well by the Democrats at their best. The role of “keeping the bastards honest” is increasingly falling to backbenchers from the two major parties, while the final seats in each state look like becoming a battle of the ideologues at both ends of the spectrum.

Update: Alexander Downer on the announcement:

“It probably marks an end of an era. The Australian Democrats will have two book-ends,” he said.

“Don Chipp at the front and Natasha Stott-Despoja at the back.”

I certainly don’t enjoy agreeing with Alexander “things that batter” Downer, but unfortunately he may be right on this one.

Even More Reason From the Liberals

Liberal Senator Judith Adams is supporting Natasha Stott-Despoja’s Bill to prohibit federally funded counselling services from engaging in deceptive advertising which would lead people to think they provide all options.

Marie Claire magazine is also doing its bit for this worthy cause.

Update (by AW): The Committee’s Report has been tabled.

Update (by PN): The hasty stroke oft goes amiss! My original description of the Bill’s purpose was incorrect. Thanks to commenters for the correction.

Come back, Natasha Stott-Despoja!

One of the less profound books on Australian politics to be published over the last few years (and there’ve been a few) is Alison Rogers’ The Natasha Factor. Nevertheless, Rogers was Stott-Despoja’s press secretary and many of her insights are of interest. One that I remembered from my reading of the book last year was that Matt Price was one of the few journos Natasha felt gave her a good run. Price is now a columnist at The Australian, and because he has the “political humour” spot that George Megalogenis used to have, can get away with saying something interesting, unlike most of the highly predictable inhouse and op/ed Murdoch flagship columnists.

Interestingly, in light of recent prognostications at Troppo about the strange death of the Australian Democrats, Matt Price’s weekend column for The Oz might almost read as if it’s the first shot in Natasha’s campaign to take the leadership back:

Common sense tells you what should happen with the Democrats. Whatever her flaws, Stott Despoja is patently the best leadership option of the four surviving Mouseketeers. When irrelevance strikes on July 1, the depleted Democrats’ alleged legislative skills become essentially redundant. Any slim chance of survival depends on selling themselves in a cutthroat, competitive political marketplace.

Bob Brown provides the template for minor party success; the Greens have benefited enormously from the Tasmanian senator’s thick-skinned opportunism, relentless idealism and shameless media savvy. Allison may be a dedicated, hardworking parliamentarian, but her chances of rekindling the Democrats’ flame from the ashes of near extinction are remote.

My guess is that from July 1 the Mickey Mouseketeers will act as four independents. The Government fancies Murray as a kindred spirit and will court him for tight votes. Bartlett will champion refugees rights and environmental issues. Allison will try to cobble together some kind of united front.

Leaving Stott Despoja to tend to neo-Conrad-ical, indulge in her own political interests and ponder the senselessness of her demise … while trying hard not to laugh at her husband’s jokes.

Price’s references to the nicknames Stott-Despoja and her husband have given their young son, and his general “Natasha’s over the bitterness of her loss of the leadership but would accept a call to return” jive suggest, when read together with the statements about the close relationship between the journo and the pollie that Rogers makes, that Price’s column is based on conversations with either Stott-Despoja or a source close to her.

Andrew Bartlett did a good job restoring some unity to the fractured Demos, and maintained a reasonable public profile in his time as leader. But Lyn Allison is a zero as a leader in an age where the Democrats need to market their message through a crowded media.

Natasha Stott-Despoja is both a principled politician and an excellent communicator, and is tragically wasted languishing in effect on the backbenches of the Senate.

In the spirit of my previous campaign at Troppo for Gilly to lead the ALP, I’m going to take up the gauntlet Matt Price throws down, and launch the LP campaign to bring back Nat! The Democrats occupy a necessary political space in Australian politics, but as well as refining their message and philosophy, need a big L Leader to get it across to have any chance of surviving. Much as it goes against the grain of their participative, member-centred ethos, their only hope is to return to Natasha.