Discussion on a previous thread on the Israeli/Gaza conflict can be continued on this one.
Linking again to the latest from Open Democracy, I thought both Paul Rogers on Israel’s exhausted strategic doctrine and Khaled Hroub on whether the Israeli actions have increased support for Hamas worth reading.
It’s probably time to continue the Gaza conversation on another thread. A discussion starter might be to link to some interesting thoughts from Daniel Levy, who for mine is one of the clearest thinkers about the whole morass of Israeli-Palestinian policits.
NB: Discussion on this post has now been closed, and can be continued here.
Published in Blogging,
Crime,
Disasters,
Ethics,
History,
Imperialism,
International,
Law,
Middle East,
Nuclear,
Palestine,
Philosophy,
Politics,
Sociology,
Terrorism and
War .
On the first thread here about the Israeli attacks on Gaza, I was struck by this comment in an article linked by Rob:
Even when development and enlightenment stare them in the face, their instinct is to destroy them pretending to safeguard their honor, the mechanics of which supersede all else including a happy life of fulfillment and accomplishments.
Ostensibly, the writer, Farid Ghatry, is accusing Hamas and Hizbollah of being ruled by “instinct”, but it doesn’t take him long to elide those organisations with “Arabs” collectively:
Their poisonous rhetoric of violence feeding a frenzied mass of ignorant Arabs leaning on their extreme religion to honor their incapacity to compete with the West is destroying future generations of hopeful saviors of our culture and traditions.
I don’t want to discuss the specifics of this conflict in this post – this thread is still open for those wishing to do so. I do want to observe that peace appears to have few champions at the moment. Endless dissections of history and propaganda claims and counter-claims seem to leave debate stuck in the same morass – of friends and enemies, and the only logic of that cycle – on both sides – is a drive to extermination. It seems to me that since the Cold War ended, the peace movement has more or less disappeared from view – at least in this country – and there are very few voices prepared to prioritise humanitarianism and conflict resolution over picking sides.
Continue reading ‘Eyeless in Gaza III’
Recent comments
Saint Furious of Ikea, joe2, Zorronsky, Liam, el oso, Fine [...]
jules, anthony nolan, jules, anthony nolan, Legal Eagle, jules [...]
Sam, Lefty E, Mark, Paul Burns, PinkyOz, Paul Burns [...]
Saint Furious of Ikea, John D, joe2, Jamo
Ville, joe2, Mercurius, Kersebleptes, adrian, Marilyn Shepherd [...]
Darryl Rosin, Sam, Paul Norton, Sam, Paul Norton, anthony nolan [...]
Robert Merkel, Kiashu, Fran Barlow, Robert Merkel, Kiashu, Mervyn Langford [...]
informally yours, Saint Furious of Ikea, informally yours, Chris, informally yours, Saint Furious of Ikea [...]
rumrebellious, RightHandThread, Nabakov, rumrebellious, Nabakov, RightHandThread [...]
Mark, Saint Furious of Ikea, Luke Walladge, Mark, Paul Burns, Bert [...]
Paul Burns, Fran Barlow, CMMC, Gummo Trotsky, Guido, pablo [...]
BilB, Peter, BilB, OldSkeptic, anthony nolan, mitchell porter [...]