Tag Archive for 'Pope Benedict XVI'

Pope Benedict XVI apologises to victims of sexual abuse in Australia

The text of the papal apology, delivered this morning at a Mass in St Mary’s Cathedral, can be read here.

The symbolism of the setting for the apology - a mass for seminarians and members of religious orders and the consecration of a new altar for the Cathedral - was no doubt intended by the Vatican to signal that the Pope was speaking sternly to those at the centre of the institution. But it’s also deeply problematic - as it suggests that the problem is only one for the church, excluding the victims who were left outside while the pomp and panoply of the liturgy took place for the exclusive benefit of the hierarchy.

Continue reading ‘Pope Benedict XVI apologises to victims of sexual abuse in Australia’

What Pope Benedict XVI actually said at World Youth Day

We’ve done our best to provide a reasonably comprehensive coverage of World Youth Day here at LP, in part because the News Limited papers, being major sponsors of the Pope fest, have studiously ignored most of the actual hard news, except to cast stones at those criticising the Church’s conduct on several justifiable grounds, in favour of happy-clappy stories about the happy-clappy pilgrims and general hagiography. As I commented earlier, the irony is that B16 himself is treated more like a pop star than a Pontiff on a mission, so in the interests of balance and fairness, if anyone’s actually interested in the full text of what the Pope had to say, you can read it here. As journalist and veteran Vatican watcher John L. Allen jr. observes, it’s classic Ratzinger.

World Youth Day: The dark side of the force?

Elliott Bledsoe reminds us not to take men wearing robes all that seriously. Make sure you look at this photo very carefully indeed.

Note: If you don’t like what you see - tough - it’s now legal to be annoyed.

Continue reading ‘World Youth Day: The dark side of the force?’

Emma Foster: In memoriam

I hope that Anthony Foster and his family, who intend to confront Pope Benedict XVI and Cardinal George Pell in Sydney this week over the Catholic Church’s treatment of their late daughter, Emma Foster, who took her own life in January and her sister Katie, both of whom were raped as primary school children by Father Kevin O’Donnell, aren’t dismissed as “Catholic bashing” and raining on the World Youth Day parade or subjected to victim blaming as Anthony Jones was. Foster told the tragic tale of his daughters’ abuse and how it marked their lives horrendously for the worse, and probably brought Emma’s life to a close, on Lateline tonight.

Continue reading ‘Emma Foster: In memoriam’

What is the purpose of World Youth Day?

Other aspects of World Youth Day 2008 have been discussed in previous posts which can be accessed here. In this post, I’d like to concentrate on why it is being held in Sydney at all.

Dr Paul Collins is probably one of the best known commentators on Catholic affairs in Australia. A former priest, he had his own run in with Cardinal Ratzinger and the Sacred Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith a few years ago, which didn’t stop him from writing a rather upbeat assessment of the prospects of Pope Benedict XVI’s papacy in God’s New Man. Some of the hopes he had in 2005 have now dissipated and he takes a rather jaundiced view of the Church’s prospects in his new book - Believers: Does Australian Catholicism Have a Future?

Collins is on the “progressive” wing of the Church, and to pose the question in the terms he does implies a view that Catholicism in Australia is in crisis. But it’s worth noting that view is firmly shared by the conservatives, and in fact World Youth Day’s Australian sojourn is supposed to be a big part of the cure for the faith’s ills.

Continue reading ‘What is the purpose of World Youth Day?’

Is criticism of World Youth Day automatically Catholic bashing?

It’s no secret that “the sectarian strand” is one of the less attractive aspects of Australian history, and interestingly, probably not one featured highly either in the so-called “black armband” or triumphalist narratives so beloved of our home grown Antipodean culture warriors. That may be because the deep cleavages - overlapping but not identical to class and ethnicity - around Catholicism and Protestantism needed to be elided and to be buried in order to construct the “Anglo-Celtic” identity which came into its own at the same time that the state aid controversy was settled into its grave and multiculturalism launched on its career. And not coincidentally. “Anglos” and “Celts” were on different sides of the political and cultural coin in the Great Southern Land of the Holy Spirit for most of its whitefella history. In a way, Gough Whitlam is probably the progenitor of the “mainstream” Anglo-Celtic Australian. But sectarianism typically rears its head as a defensive accusation whenever the Catholic Church is particularly prominent in public debate, and whenever criticism is directed at the Church’s institutional power.

In the context of World Youth Day in Sydney this week, this accusation has been levelled both with regard to criticism of the extraordinary powers granted to police by Greg Craven and with regard to the ABC’s highlighting of Cardinal George Pell’s ethically very questionable handling of clergy sexual abuse complaints by Andrew Bolt. More broadly, the media sponsors of World Youth Day at News Limited have worked themselves into a lather of holy righteousness, denouncing “aggressive secularism” and lauding all the Popey goodness they’re sponsoring - without disclosing that sponsorship in their journalistic or opinion pieces.

It may well be that a residue of sectarian anti-Catholicism might be in play on the margins of all this, but one of the big ironies is that while Tony Abbott and others speculated that Pope Benedict’s message might not be communicated effectively, the Pope himself has seemingly become a football to be kicked around by the usual suspects in distinctly Australian culture wars which often have only a tenuous connection with his concerns. But are there not genuine issues - of public interest - that can and should be raised at a time when Catholicism is top of the pops in the media stakes?

Continue reading ‘Is criticism of World Youth Day automatically Catholic bashing?’

Annoyed! II

This sort of thing was probably always going to surface in the media just before Pope Benedict XVI came to Sydney for World Youth Day, but I’m sure Cardinal Pell is annoyed that he’s been accused of lying to a victim of clerical sexual abuse in order to protect a priest who was later convicted. He might also be annoyed that there are documents obtained through legal action and given to Lateline which make a pretty convincing case that the allegations may have merit. When he was Archbishop of Melbourne, Pell was accused of offering victims hush money not to speak out (an accusation he denied), something that is now expressly prohibited by the Catholic Church’s protocol - Towards Healing - on dealing with clergy abuse victims. Broken Rites, a support and advocacy group, has criticised the Church’s protocols. It’s noteworthy here that the Archdiocese of Melbourne has a separate set of protocols, a legacy from the time when Dr Pell was Archbishop and his opposition (alone among all the Catholic Church’s Australian bishops) to the national standards regulating church responses.

Continue reading ‘Annoyed! II’

Annoyed!

To be fair to Morris Iemma and his bunch of clowns masquerading as a government, New South Wales isn’t alone in imposing risible and over the top security regulations for major “public events”. We’ve seen similar things in finance talkfests with Melbourne and CHOGM in Queensland saw Peter Beattie invent preventive detention for “known public nuisances”, as well as going to ludicrous lengths to prevent protest. But Iemma’s mob seem to have made it an art form, perhaps because as I’ve speculated before, their sense of authoritarianism compensates for their total ineffectuality in governing just about anything else than public events. (Compare - “public services”.) But the latest bunch of regulations for the Pope Fest really take the cake. It’s more or less private governance. Where’s the public benefit in preventing pilgrims attending World Youth Day in Sydney this month from being annoyed? Will their world really come to an end if someone hands them a condom or wears a t-shirt with an anti-homophobia message? What possible public justification does the NSW government have for denying basic rights to freedom of expression at the instance of the fragile petals in Cardinal Pell’s hierarchy?

Continue reading ‘Annoyed!’

Papal apology?

The Pope had a lot to say about sexual abuse when he was in America recently. It’s now being reported that there’s “pressure” on him to repeat his apology to victims specifically in the Australian context, when he’s out here for World Youth Day. I have no doubt Benedict will, and I suspect the pressure in this instance isn’t needed. While an apology promotes healing for individuals directly damaged by clerical sexual abuse, it doesn’t address the broader problem, and nor do the protocols the church now has in place for dealing with complaints and reparations, welcome as they are. What should be quite familiar to Benedict is the concept of “structural sin” - something originating in liberation theology which he in his incarnation as Cardinal Ratzinger acknowledged as a valid manifestation of human evil and wickedness, even as he disagreed with the political and some of the theological overtones of liberation theology as theorised and practiced in Latin America (and in - significantly - Germany).

The Pope would also know very well that in Catholic sacramental and moral theology, an act of contrition and indeed an act of reparation are worthless without an awareness of the fault that led to a sin, and a genuine intention to “go and sin no more”, as Someone or other put it rather pithily. All this raises the question of whether the conditions of possibility of sexual abuse are genuinely being addressed.

Continue reading ‘Papal apology?’

Pope Benedict, global warming and the Oz media

On a few occasions I have commented on LP contrasting Pope Benedict’s strong engagement with the issue of global warming with the statements of George Pell and others on the Catholic Right in Australia.

Yesterday I attempt to do the same thing via the Sydney Morning Herald letters column in response to Gerard Henderson’s defence of Pell’s intervention in the stem cell debate. I specifically pointed out that Pell and other Catholic conservatives were running a line on global warming which seems to be all about political solidarity with their denialist co-thinkers of other faiths (or none), and out of step with the current Pope’s position.

My letter was not published in today’s SMH, but other letters were, letters which could be construed as condemning the Catholic Church per se rather than particular individuals who were out of step with the Pope.

I have since googled the search terms “global warming” “Pope Benedict” on both the Net overall, and Australian sites specifically. What is striking is that the Pope’s engagement with global warming has been picked up by left-liberal MSM outlets overseas such as the UK Guardian, but not by the Australian MSM. What reporting there has been in Australia seems to be confined to progressive Catholic sites.
Continue reading ‘Pope Benedict, global warming and the Oz media’

Hell ain’t a bad place to be

Hell does exist according to Pope Benedict. Not so much fire and brimstone and demons with hot pokers (as erronously reported in the media) but a place of torment for those that reject God. Not that it will sway those infidels already with a season ticket on a one way ride.

Indeed in modern times, visions of Hell have moved away from Jean-Paul Sartre stated that hell is other people. Gary Larson had all sorts of visions of hell usually involving banjos, accordions and other instruments of torture.

So dear reader, you have been livin’ easy, living’ free. You are going down so what do you expect Hell to be like?

As for me, Hell would be reliving the ‘98 and 2005 rugby league preliminary finals as well as the 2001 grand final over and over again. Or being stuck in, say the Reverend Fred Nile’s vision of heaven.
Continue reading ‘Hell ain’t a bad place to be’

Sheiken not stirred

Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali and his frequently embarrassing and sometimes offensive comments seem to open some strange fracture lines on the right of politics, if Catholic blogger John Heard’s op/ed in The Australian today is anything to go by. Heard makes two substantive points which are worth underlining:

But whether or not the man should be allowed to say the things he does - or be deported or jailed for them, as some have suggested - is not the kind of discussion a mature democracy should indulge with a serious hearing.

If all we have to fear from Muslims in Australia is the immediately offensive and sometimes remarkably incisive opinions of an ageing sheik, then we are doing better than Indonesia, Britain, Spain, Somalia, France, the US and The Philippines.

But perhaps part of the motivation for these sentiments, as implied by Heard’s characterisation of the Sheik’s remarks on dress as “remarkably incisive” and his suggestion that al-Hilali may be an “Aussie larrikin”, is that Heard also supports some of the Sheik’s views.

Certainly, anyone who has witnessed the mutton parading as lamb that descends on Flemington and, later, central Melbourne during the spring racing carnival knows what “uncovered meat” looks like.

More serious watchers noted that, despite his irresponsible observations about a gang-rape conviction, al-Hilali’s comments might have actually expressed a more humane approach to women’s dress than the one usually on offer. Surely something is seriously wrong with a society that teaches its young women that to be accepted or prized they must conform to almost pornographic dress codes.

What kind of feminism results in eight-year-old girls in boob tubes?

[To answer the question, look to marketing’s discovery of “tweens” rather than feminism, but anyway…]

Continue reading ‘Sheiken not stirred’

Historicising the rectification of names

This post is a bit of a history of my holiday reading - which has all been what Norman Davies describes as big books of history, and all by historians who are conservative in one way or another - Davies himself, originally a Polish specialist, and no lover of Marxist historiography, Niall Ferguson, whose suggestion to the Americans was that they should try to do Empire properly, and the crusty Catholic Michael Burleigh, whose writing has a lot in common with Benedict(XVI)ine writers like George Weigel. All have fascinated me, and taught me something new about European history, though Burleigh annoyed me a lot too.

Continue reading ‘Historicising the rectification of names’

Pope Benedict Beer

From the Curt Jester.

Iraq’s unmentionable religious conflict

From today’s Crikey email.

As debate over Iraq erupts again in the Australian parliament, there’s one aspect of the seemingly intractable conflict which doesn’t appear to have been mentioned in the domestic stoushing, even after Kevin Rudd made a prominent case in The Monthly for the compatibility of Christianity and an anti-war stance. Yet to filter into either the Australian media or political discussion is the appalling situation of Iraqi Christians.

The New York Times carried a report yesterday on the murder of priests, the attacks on Christians’ property and churches, the many kidnappings and the flight of perhaps half of the Christian population from “democratic” Iraq.

Pope Benedict’s ill-chosen remarks in his Regensburg address are now being seized upon by Iraqi factions to threaten Christians with individual and collective retribution.

There are several ironies here.

Continue reading ‘Iraq’s unmentionable religious conflict’