Tag Archive for 'rio tinto'

Stern Hu open thread

The obvious point to be made in the case of Stern Hu, the Rio Tinto executive detained in China for alleged bribery and espionage, is that it’s unacceptable for Australian citizens (or anyone else, for that matter) to be locked up indefinitely without a proper legal process. That said, as An Onymous Lefty points out, at least the Australian government has finally raised formal objections, unlike a certain former government when an Australian citizen spent five years in detention without any semblance of due legal process…

Beyond that, it’s hard to figure out what the hell kind of game is being played here. However much Australia, and the developed nations, may “need” China, they “need” us too. And throwing citizens of Western countries into what is going to be perceived as arbitrary detention, which could theoretically go on for years is going to have rather a chilling effect on business ties. That’s in no-one’s interest, least of all the Communist Party leadership’s. So what’s really going on here?

“It’s not like we’re battling it” Part I – EITEs

So Woodside, Rio and Boral have responded to the Australian Conservation Foundation and Australian Climate Justice Program complaint to the ACCC about the yawning gap between the shrillness of public emoting and disclosures to the investment community, which increased even as the emos won greater concessions at each stage of the process. The EITEs have won some $16.4bn of public money in concessions at last count. That is an extraordinary amount of public money being handed over to pad their profitability: about 19 000 new buses, to take the Rooze’s benchmark, or 455 time-wasting, subjectively measured ‘energy savings’ schemes.

Rio Tinto’s response, that they’re not ‘battling’ a global emissions trading scheme, is laughable. How do they honestly expect a national – let alone global – scheme to gain traction if everyone keeps undercutting it? Business commentary, from the most hackneyed pining for a fanciful, counterfactual world free of political machinations (Carbontaxalia?) to more orthodox defences of industry have questioned the EITE concessions. eg. Electricity Supply Industry Apparatchik Keith Orchison has noted that, “… firms are hardly going to play up the negatives to the investment community, particularly as the legislation is still a moving playing field. However, as the analysts all read the papers, surely they must be asking these companies about their public utterances – how one wonders does the rest of that conversation go?”

One does indeed. The cut and thrust of the complaint is that with such a thoroughly impotent carbon price now firmly on the table, companies have an obligation under s52 of the Trade Practices Act to, well, make ‘the rest of that conservation’ redundant. The key issue for the ACCC will be whether the Statements ‘were made in trade or commerce’ or bear such a character. The complaint alleges that the statements were absolutely core to these businesses. Indeed, they were instrumental in delaying the scheme, increasing compensation etc. Continue reading ‘“It’s not like we’re battling it” Part I – EITEs’

So we won’t have to say “BHP Billiton Rio Tinto” then…

BHP Billiton has decided to abandon its plans to buy Rio Tinto. Aside from the antitrust concerns of customers and regulators around the world, a major reason for BHP’s decision involves another acquisition:

A big factor in the decision was the size of Rio’s debt, which blew out to about $US42 billion ($65.8 billion) after the ill-timed acquisition of Canadian aluminium group Alcan last year. BHP carries only $US6 billion in debt. “It is just not the right time to be taking on the debt that is on Rio’s balance sheet,” Mr Kloppers said.

Chinese steel mills, which were concerned that a BHP-Rio combination would be able to control prices for iron ore and other raw materials, were also pleased the offer was dead.

Continue reading ‘So we won’t have to say “BHP Billiton Rio Tinto” then…’