This (long) post is inspired by the tapes of self-styled seduction guru Dimitri The Lover (AKA James Sears) that are being discussed on blogs all over at the moment (or at least linked to with a LOLOLOL!!1!), and the arguments as to whether they are genuine recordings of a creep or performance art from a guy engaging in viral marketing for a movie. I’ll get to them later, but first a little about the background of the “seduction community”, because Sears claims to be a different kind of seduction guru.
There’s been a lot written about the seduction community (AKA players/PUAs (Pick Up Artists)) in the last few years, and it’s worth emphasising here that most men join these (largely online) communities because they are simply looking to gain more confidence when interacting with women, that there’s nothing wrong in principle with seeking sex without commitment for either men or women as long as everybody’s being emotionally honest and physically safe/sane, and that most of these men probably do ultimately want a committed relationship one day. These points are usually clouded by the best-known Community gurus emphasising cynical bedpost-notching above all (and making a lot of money talking about the ways that their special techniques allegedly make women powerless to resist them).
One of the aims of the Community is to correct a common problem for inexperienced men – an overly romantic view of women as sweet, pure and sexually demure that makes these men overly hesitant and overly eager to please. The Community doesn’t tend to mention that this package usually includes a belief that sex is inherently dirty, resulting in a side-serve of self-loathing for their desire to defile women, which is the part of their attitude that is most offputting, rather than the common plaint that the men are just “being too nice”.
There’s absolutely nothing wrong with correcting the pernicious stereotype that sex sullies women and that men must supplicate and compensate women for their dirty male desires. Done properly it can lead to a more realistic, relaxed and confident style of social interaction that both sexes can appreciate. Unfortunately, instead of moving away from gender-stereotypes to view women as people with highly individual wants and needs (that often do actually include sex for fun with the right person at the right time), what tends to happen in the Community is that one gender-stereotype is replaced with another: women as fickle, emotional, selfish and easily manipulated. The idea that sex demeans women remains, but is recast as sluts deserve to be demeaned. Then the Community wonders why folks (not just feminists) find fault with their collective wisdom. Continue reading ‘Cognitive dissonance in the Seduction Community’

Recent comments
joe2, joe2, Mercurius, Razor, Mark, Razor [...]
Helen, Mercurius, Razor, Razor, sg, zoot [...]
Mark, joe2, anthony nolan, joe2, anthony nolan, Mercurius [...]
Chav, Chav, Liam, Paul Norton, Fran Barlow, Paul Norton [...]
Lefty E, Laura, Pavlov's Cat, Laura, Anna Winter, skepticlawyer [...]
David Irving (no relation), Elise, Fran Barlow, Chris, Huggybunny, Chris [...]
nasking, Gummo Trotsky, ewe2, Elise, Mercurius, nasking [...]
Gummo Trotsky, CMMC, Spana, Terry, Paul Norton, Ginja [...]
Caroline Church, Caroline Church, Paul Norton, Caroline Church, Fran Barlow, Andrew Reynolds [...]
Elise, David Irving (no relation), Sam, David Irving (no relation), Terry, Sam [...]
David Irving (no relation), Sam, Pavlov's Cat, Paul Norton, Sam, Chris [...]
Mark, Brett, Geoff Robinson, David Irving (no relation), Elise, David Irving (no relation) [...]