<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Larvatus Prodeo &#187; The Howard Years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://larvatusprodeo.net/tag/the-howard-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net</link>
	<description>Life, Culture and Politics from BrisVegas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:27:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Will &quot;Liberal Rule&quot; improve on &quot;The Howard Years&quot;?</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/07/21/will-liberal-rule-improve-on-the-howard-years/</link>
		<comments>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/07/21/will-liberal-rule-improve-on-the-howard-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Merkel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howardia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Howard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Howard Years]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/?p=9095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In between the incessant ads for bicycles (amusingly, an ad featuring Lance Armstrong only claims that &#8220;we believe&#8221; his sponsor makes the &#8220;world&#8217;s best bikes&#8221; &#8211; which must be the first time ever Armstrong wasn&#8217;t sure about anything) , SBS&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In between the incessant ads for bicycles (amusingly, an ad featuring Lance Armstrong only claims that &#8220;we believe&#8221; his sponsor makes the &#8220;world&#8217;s best bikes&#8221; &#8211; which must be the first time ever Armstrong wasn&#8217;t sure about anything) , SBS&#8217;s tour coverage has featured a fair bit of promotion for a new documentary series &#8211; <em>Liberal Rule</em>.  According to their program guide:</p>
<blockquote><p>The 1996-2007 Howard government made the most determined attempt to change Australian society since the brief and revolutionary Whitlam era of the early 1970s. Was it successful? SBS presents a provocative consideration of how this country changed as a result of one man&#8217;s determination to make his particular mark.</p></blockquote>
<p>The teaser preview (viewable on SBS&#8217;s website under &#8220;sneak peek TV&#8221;, though there&#8217;s no convenient direct link) suggests that this version will at least attempt some critical analysis, rather than just serving as a piece of extended stenography as <em>The Howard Years</em> did.  The massive handwave about the sale of Telstra in the teaser doesn&#8217;t bode well, though.</p>
<p><b>ELSEWHERE:</b> Joni at Blogocrats (and others in comments) have  <a HREF="http://blogocrats.wordpress.com/2009/07/21/liberals-rule-ok/">noted</a> Gerard Henderson&#8217;s <a HREF="http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/liberal-history-ambushed-by-leftwing-pundits-20090720-dqq8.html?page=-1">spray</a> on the program, which he describes as a &#8220;shocker and a disgrace&#8221;.  It sounds better already&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/07/21/will-liberal-rule-improve-on-the-howard-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>118</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Howard&#039;s back!</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2008/11/17/howards-back/</link>
		<comments>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2008/11/17/howards-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film, TV, Video etc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howardia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Howard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subprime mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Howard Years]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2008/11/17/howards-back/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost a year after the former Dear Leader lost the election and his seat of Bennelong, the ABC is &#8220;heavily promoting&#8221; (something of an understatement) The Howard Years. Will we never be quit of this man? Personally, I intend to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost a year after the former Dear Leader lost the election and his seat of Bennelong, the ABC is &#8220;heavily promoting&#8221; (something of an understatement) <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/tv/comingsoon.htm#?vid=PRM0065982howard">The Howard Years</a>. Will we never be quit of this man? Personally, I intend to watch Good News Week. I&#8217;m sure this historical record will mainly be emblematic of the deep sense of self-satisfaction the various interviewees have, and their propensity to knife each other &#8211; all the froth and bubble that went on beneath the iron grip that Howard had on all of them. Does anyone care all that much now that it&#8217;s history? You tell me.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the man himself is running out of places to hide. The US no longer offers such a congenial political climate for John Howard, although there&#8217;s still Fox News for him to appear on.</p>
<p><span id="more-7531"></span>It&#8217;s interesting how times change. The &#8220;big government conservative&#8221; is now gettin&#8217; some lovin&#8217; from <a href="http://www.catallaxyfiles.com/blog/?p=3820">the Catallaxy crew</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Also, former PM Howard weighs into the financial crisis debate and takes the side of the Austrian libertarian interepretation. [sic]</p></blockquote>
<p>That would be the claim that the subprime mess, and therefore presumably the global financial crisis, is all the fault of those poor people who wanted to own homes. How this squares with Howard&#8217;s own role in promoting aspirationalism and the housing bubble is anyone&#8217;s guess. But then truth-telling, and indeed consistency, were never his strong suits. It&#8217;s a rather horrendous thing to contemplate as to what sort of approach he&#8217;d have taken if he&#8217;d been re-elected and the current economic conniptions were occurring on his watch.</p>
<p><b>Elsewhere</b>: <a href="http://guyberes.com/2008/11/17/the-howard-years-part-one/">Guy Beres</a>, <a href="http://www.sauer-thompson.com/archives/opinion/2008/11/the-howard-year.php">Public Opinion</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2008/11/17/howards-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>167</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

