<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Larvatus Prodeo &#187; tourist traps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://larvatusprodeo.net/tag/tourist-traps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net</link>
	<description>Life, Culture and Politics from BrisVegas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:09:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>World&#039;s worst tourist traps</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2008/12/01/worlds-worst-tourist-traps/</link>
		<comments>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2008/12/01/worlds-worst-tourist-traps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 02:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Merkel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Levity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lygon st]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tourism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tourist traps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larvatusprodeo.net/2008/12/01/worlds-worst-tourist-traps/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[San Franscisco is indeed truly marvelous city for the visitor. There are innumerable places to eat, drink, look at, and do. But approximately a metric squillion tourists descend on Fisherman&#8217;s Wharf, a truly awful collection of overpriced take-away joints and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>San Franscisco is indeed truly marvelous city for the visitor.  There are innumerable places to eat, drink, look at, and do.  But approximately a metric squillion tourists descend on Fisherman&#8217;s Wharf, a truly awful collection of overpriced take-away joints and T-shirt shops (parts of Height-Ashbury are not much better, to be honest).  I don&#8217;t mind; if they&#8217;re happy to spend time there, it means that there&#8217;s less tourists crowding the interesting spots.  But while I was taken there as part of the conference I attended, I wouldn&#8217;t go there voluntarily without a very large financial incentive.  It is, perhaps, the nastiest tourist trap I have ever visited, its only redeeming feature being that you catch the ferry to Alcatraz there.</p>
<p>Recalling that, I came across this <a HREF="http://www.forbestraveler.com/best-lists/tourist-traps-story.html">list of the world&#8217;s top tourist traps</a>, which features Fisherman&#8217;s Wharf and the Leaning Tower of Pisa amongst a number of others.  For what it&#8217;s worth, I&#8217;m not convinced they distinguish adequately between &#8220;places that are interesting, but have been surrounded by so much tourist crap it&#8217;s offputting&#8221;, and &#8220;places where the main attaction itself isn&#8217;t that great&#8221;.  To take two examples I&#8217;m familiar with, the tourist paraphernalia surrounding the Forbidden City and Niagara Falls are annoying.  But the City, and the Falls, are still great.  Take away the souvenir shops from Fisherman&#8217;s Wharf, by contrast, and there&#8217;s nothing there.</p>
<p>While the parlous state of the Aussie dollar has increased the cost of travel, the way it&#8217;s going the collapse in the oil price and the general malaise around the world economy might just about compensate.  And Australia has its own nasty tourist traps; the southern bit of Lygon St. Carlton, and the entirety of Surfers Paradise come to mind.  I&#8217;m curious: what are the nastiest tourist traps the LP readership has come across?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2008/12/01/worlds-worst-tourist-traps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>119</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

