We’ve heard all this before. Remember when Kevin Rudd won, and we were told his election was a victory for John Howard?
Right wing commentators couldn’t have been quicker out of the starting blocks to proclaim “America is still a Centre Right nation”. In fact they were at it before the votes were counted – Bill Bennett’s lugubrations on CNN is one example folks here might have seen in watching the election coverage. The memes abound. McCain still got 46%! Obama’s win wasn’t big enough!
Such exciteable commentary doesn’t stop to consider, of course, that in a two party system, without the presence of a strong third party challenger, landslides aren’t that common. Ronald Reagan in 1980 received 50.1% of the popular vote, in an election which everyone agrees ushered in an “Era”. Barack Obama did somewhat better than that. And John McCain still pulled in a significant number of independent voters – it’s not too difficult to imagine how wrong the claims that a more conservative candidate would have run better are. Let’s not forget that McCain continually sounded the note that he was someone who often differed from his own party.
Let’s make a couple of quick points here. Most of this speculation – and the accompanying predictions that Obama may be a steady as she goes moderate – is just that. It’s basically worthless, except for what it reveals about the politics of those doing the predicting. We don’t know exactly how Obama will govern. We do know that he’s stated that big challenges will require bold measures. And we do know that an agenda of de facto universal healthcare, economic revival and redressing the plight of middle and working class voters is what he won on. That’s surprisingly radical in the American context. And this election saw a lot of the anti-government rhetoric Reagan ran into town with finally kicked to the curb.
Secondly, let’s consider the fact that the “liberal” scare didn’t work (and the sorts of voters who were ready to believe Obama to be a “socialist” were always going to be in the GOP tent):
Perhaps the most revealing post-election data on that question came from within the defeated McCain campaign. In an interview with Roger Simon of Politico, the Republican candidate’s speechwriter and friend, Mark Salter, disclosed that in the campaign’s own internal polling data, 60 percent of Americans regarded Obama as “liberal.” The campaign thought that would be enough to defeat him, which is why it hammered on the “left-wing” themes.
Baiting the liberals didn’t work this year. Disgusted with the Republican right, voters wanted something different and weren’t afraid to look leftward. That is what “realignment” means.
Continue reading ‘Obama: The predictability of right wing predictions?’
Recent comments
Jane, andyc, Paul Burns, joe2, Paul Burns, Ootz [...]
Flynnboy, terangeree, Corin, Spana, Mervyn Langford, John D [...]
Jacques Chester, wilful, feral sparrowhawk, Katz, Fran Barlow, Jacques Chester [...]
Patricia WA, Paul Burns, andyc, joe2, Paul Burns, Fran Barlow [...]
Katz, Katz, derrida derider, anthony nolan, Mervyn Langford, David Irving (no relation) [...]
Fran Barlow, BilB, Fran Barlow, BilB, Fran Barlow, Fran Barlow [...]
Paul Burns, joe2, Jacques de Molay, Daniel, Paul of Berwick, Paul Burns [...]
Helen, feral sparrowhawk, myriad74, joe2, myriad74, joe2 [...]
Fran Barlow, Fran Barlow, Tim Dymond, Ken Miles, THR, Sarah [...]
David Irving (no relation), desipis, billie, Angharad, Drscroogemcduck, desipis [...]
wilful, Andyc, Paul Burns, joe2, Mercurius, anthony nolan [...]
Katz, Paul Burns, Katz, Paul Burns, anthony nolan, anthony nolan [...]