Other aspects of World Youth Day 2008 have been discussed in previous posts which can be accessed here. In this post, I’d like to concentrate on why it is being held in Sydney at all.
Dr Paul Collins is probably one of the best known commentators on Catholic affairs in Australia. A former priest, he had his own run in with Cardinal Ratzinger and the Sacred Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith a few years ago, which didn’t stop him from writing a rather upbeat assessment of the prospects of Pope Benedict XVI’s papacy in God’s New Man. Some of the hopes he had in 2005 have now dissipated and he takes a rather jaundiced view of the Church’s prospects in his new book - Believers: Does Australian Catholicism Have a Future?
Collins is on the “progressive” wing of the Church, and to pose the question in the terms he does implies a view that Catholicism in Australia is in crisis. But it’s worth noting that view is firmly shared by the conservatives, and in fact World Youth Day’s Australian sojourn is supposed to be a big part of the cure for the faith’s ills.
Continue reading ‘What is the purpose of World Youth Day?’
Cross-posted at Terry Flew’s blog.
Most attention in the U.S. Presidential elections has been given to the Democratic Party, and the wide schism revealed in its support base between supporters of Hillary Clinton (majority of women, Latinos, older voters, lower income, lower average levels of education) and Barack Obama (majority of African-Americans, younger voters, higher income, tertiary educated). It has been cast as “a standoff between the Dukes of Hazzard and the Huxtables”, but its fault lines are pretty clear. This cannot be said for the Republican Party going into the 2008 elections.
John McCain does not bring a strong hand to the election, although the ongoing saga of the Democrat nominee has helped somewhat. There is usually a change in the governing party after eight years of one President holding office. While this was not true in 1988, George Bush gained the presidency with Ronald Reagan having a personal approval rating of about 60%. George W. Bush has a personal approval rating below 30%, and sinking. Even if his approval figures were better, this would be no guarantee against change. Bill Clinton left office with personal approval ratings over 60%, but his Vice-President Al Gore could not defeat the Republicans in 2000.
The position of the Republicans as a party is far worse than that of John McCain as its presumptive Presidential nominee. Continue reading ‘John McCain and the future of the Republicans’
Recent comments
Nick, Wayne Thompson, Frank Calabrese, Anna Winter, Russell, Frank Calabrese [...]
Kim, Bingo Bango Boingo
Nick, Ag, Postglobalism, Mark, Kim, Adrien [...]
Darryl Rosin, Kim, Ben Raue, SJ, SJ, Kim [...]
Mark, Bingo Bango Boingo, Mark
Alastair, Kim, patrickg, pablo, Adrien, adrian [...]
Brian, joe2, joe2, laura, Mindy, Robert Merkel [...]
NicM, Graeme, Adrien, tigtog, laura, Liam [...]
Brian, professor rat, myriad, Kim, Liam, Bismarck [...]
Mark, Brian, David, danny, Mark, danny [...]
simply Nepaling, Emma in grade 12 english class, Li Kao, Katz, FDB, murph the surf [...]
Adrien, mitchell porter, wilful, David, wilful, David [...]