Archive for the 'Blogging' Category

Beyond the red state-blue state dichotomy

I’ve been reading Jerry F. Hough’s Changing Party Coalitions: The Mystery of the Red State-Blue State Alignment on and off over the weekend, after it arrived from Amazon on Friday. I’d been wanting to have a read for a while - after I saw this review. Part of what Hough - a long time Sovietologist and comparative politics scholar - is trying to do is to expose some of the myths that we tend to create about past political patterns and partisan alignments - based on our present understanding of voter motivation and party image. He makes the point - not in itself an unusual one but rarely developed to its full analytical potential - that the Democrats and Republicans have effectively swapped ideological sides several times, though his analysis of the Jacksonian-Jeffersonian mythos of the Democratic Party suggests that the Donkeys were never actually to the left of the GOP before FDR. It’s also highly relevant to note that Adlai Stevenson was the first “New Democrat” - adopting a “suburban strategy” that effectively turned its back on the New Deal’s economic agenda, and that JFK, although his ideas on foreign policy were quite distinct from Adlai’s, shared his economic conservatism and was effectively a do-nothing President in the domestic policy field. The fact that “left” and “right” or “liberal” and conservative” have shifted ground from the New Deal party system to a cultural focus, and that McGovernite cultural liberalism was a big part of that shift, obscures for instance the truth that Richard Nixon was arguably a moderate liberal domestically, while McGovern’s economics had more in common with Goldwater than Johnson.

Hough’s also fascinating on the contingency of racial and national identity, and although some of his own commitments are shaped by a relatively conservative developmentalist political science ideology of modernisation, his injection of a long historical perspective and a sociological toolkit into political analysis of the American scene is a very valuable contribution. Changing Party Coalitions was written in 2005, but his discussion of the dynamics of the recent “Red State-Blue State Alignment” is quite prescient - and very useful for thinking about what Barack Obama’s biggest political challenge might be, and why Hillary Clinton was able to do well as a very unlikely standard bearer of the white working class.

Continue reading ‘Beyond the red state-blue state dichotomy’

Conferencing and blogging

I spent the latter part of last week attending the Creating Value: Between Commons and Commerce conference organised by the ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation. The CCi conference was here in Brisbane - at the Convention Centre over at Southbank - but it was evidently a bumper week for conferences and fora related to blogging - with Canberra hosting a Microsoft Politics & Technology Forum and PDF2008 (”Personal Democracy Forum”) taking place in New York.

I’ll be writing something up later in the week on what I gleaned from the CCi conference, but in the meantime, for anyone interested in the interfaces between citizen journalism, blogging, new media and online technologies and platforms, there is, of course, a lot of reading material available on the web. The Microsoft thing seems the least blogged - and perhaps that’s because rather oddly, political bloggers were largely left off the invite list - though I did hear that Annabel Crabb launched a memorable attack on us in absentia. Unfortunately there were no “sketch writers” present to record it. But Axel Bruns at Snurb has posted a comprehensive coverage of many of the key sessions of CCi, and Terry Flew and Jason Wilson also provide some information and commentary. Over in the Big Apple, Tim Watts from Tree of Knowledge has done a sterling job reflecting on some of the sessions he attended at PDF2008.

A bientot!

I’m feeling a bit burnt out as a blogger, so I’m taking a bit of a break for a while. Apologies if I’ve been a bit over the top at times - I do feel passionately about a lot of what I write about, but maybe I need some time out to get it all in a bit of a broader perspective. There’s a sense in which this blogosphere thing becomes a bit of an entity in itself and has its own dynamics which can be quite negative and can sweep you away if you’re not taking sufficient care. Maybe some times I’ve been a little personal when I shouldn’t have been and I’m sorry for that… Anyway, love youse all!

Now that Pamela Bone is dead…

Yeah, you might have noticed already. I’m in a Truthiness mood tonight, as Stephen Colbert might say. Remember all the loud denunciations I copped from Harry Clarke, Tim Blair et al et al etc. - all the feminists of total convenience - for not denouncing the female genital mutilation loudly enough? Coz it’s all about teh Islam and threats to Western Civ, etc., and that mob are all on the side of women’s rights, and that manly man of steel John Howard is taking us to war to free Afghani women from burqas. And George W. Bush is going to hunt those Al-Qaeda evildoers down. (And Islam is not a race, and some of my best friends… oops, hang on?) While Laura and Condi look after the oppressed women. Or something… Oh yeah, it isn’t 2003 any more… Remember that word fistula - you might not have read that on teh Blair blog - being a word of three syllables and all. And in Latin.

But I talked about it at the time. Now that Pamela Bone is dead (and God rest her soul, may she be blessed with eternal rest, and may perpetual light shine upon her), where are the voices with the loud condemn? What’s with that Australian crusade for women’s rights in benighted Islamic Middle Eastern countries? After all, we - Dolly Downer and John Howard and Tim Blair and Andrew Bolt and Planet Janet told us so - are all (post?) feminists now. It’s on the citizenship test, dude - and dudette a la 50s pinup style no doubt. (Ps - don’t use that politically correct, activist judge f-word though…)

Well, never mind. Here’s a post from The Global Sociology Blog for the benefit of anyone who wanted to continue highlighting the horrors perpetrated on women in the developing world even if there’s not a convenient culture wars damn the left angle in it. (And that’s not to say that women in the developed world don’t still cop a lot - but there’s something to celebrate about a very large majority of Australians agreeing - at least in theory when asked by pollsters - that women have rights over their own choices and bodies - even if that masks continued gender inequality in oh, so many ways…).

You can donate to Medicins San Frontieres here.

And you might be interested in the fact that rape has finally been recognised by the UN as a war crime, something I wrote about last year, but something the keyboard warriors seem to… well, gloss over is far too kind. Because the fact that women are overwhelmingly the victims of war seems to be recognised neither by the pro-war Right nor the “humanitarian intervention” so-called Left. Continue reading ‘Now that Pamela Bone is dead…’

Read it and weep

Crikey editorialises:

Beyond the continuing drama of Belinda Neal’s Night of the Iguanas, one other story has hogged the talkback airwaves and tabloid pages this week:

The woman, 28, who moved from Geelong to Adelaide three months ago, was refused bail in the Elizabeth Magistrates Court. She was charged with five counts of criminal neglect, two of acting to endanger life and three of acting in a way likely to cause harm.

The alleged offences took place between February 1 and Monday, when police raided two houses in Adelaide and found up to 21 children living in filth and squalor.

You know the one we mean.

Yeah, it’s all about the kiddies. Mal Brough emotes. And Brendan Nelson’s veins are popping. Crikey tries to take the high moral ground and claim this story - which punches all the buttons (TM !!!!) about the neglect of the children - is more worthy of loud denunciation or on the other hand, more… tabloid crud, but what’s their point? Why are the kiddies neglected? Why isn’t there an intervention into ADELAIDE? Etc. We all know that’s where the weird murders are. Bleh blah. Lordy, let’s not have any actual structural analysis of why such situations might arise. It’s all the individual pathology, stupid. Raise your eyes - just for a second - don’t blink too hard - from the important issue of why Belinda Neal hasn’t yet been burnt as a witch.

There might be a view that we - in the independent blogosphere - might be able to do a little better than this (without the huge financial and human resources that the MSM can leverage) but - based on some hard facts - you - the ejumacated readership of teh independent blogs would rather read about and comment on the SERIOUS ISSUES OF THE DAY. As stipulated by the said MSM. Maybe I’m wrong? (I’m not actually, and I could cite stat after stat to show that)… but….

You tell us. Continue reading ‘Read it and weep’

Poliblogger no more

Senator Andrew Bartlett gives his final speech around 6pm tonight. You should be able to catch it on NewsRadio, or streaming on the Parliament House website.

The silver lining is that he intends to keep blogging. While the Australian Senate will lack the benefit of his insights, the Ozplogosphere doesn’t have to. I look forward to his continued blogging contributions, and any other contributions he plans to make to Australian public life.

Leadership and voting in Australian elections

This post is something of an addendum to my previous one on AES data on issue salience in the 2007 Australian federal elections. As I argued then, what good social science research shows about the influences on voting paints a very different picture from either the day to day commentary in the media or, for that matter, even longer length and more reflective journalism. Perhaps one reason why there’s little appreciation of some basic patterns - some of which are quite distinct to this country - which shape voting intention and voting is the fact that academic research is often hidden by pay for view firewalls - though fortunately some universities (and I’m happy to say QUT is taking a lead by requiring all academics to publish their research as e-prints under Creative Commons licences) are trying to recover the function of the dissemination of knowledge from the commercial rapacity of academic publishers.

Anyway, having given up on what was perhaps a naive hope that the mainstream media might learn something from getting things so wrong last year, I think it’s time that we took a lead in disseminating insights from academic research - something I think can be another string in the blogosphere’s bow to add to the talents and insights of the pseph bloggers. So, as part of that, and happily I can provide a link because Taylor & Francis do publish some of the content of the Australian Journal of Political Science for free (I’m not entirely sure whether you have to register to get through to the link, but if you do it’s not a particularly intrusive or onerous process), here’s some research from Phillip Senior and Peter Van Onselen on leadership effects in Australian elections.

Continue reading ‘Leadership and voting in Australian elections’

Trolling, not just for the intertubes any more

Jason Wilson picks up on the Burchell attack piece on bloggers I wrote about earlier today, and asks some pertinent questions. He also points to comments at Public Opinion:

He’s just trolling on an op-ed page.

Posted by: dj | June 23, 2008 10:33 AM

“He’s just trolling on an op-ed page.”

True. Baiting bloggers is the new tactic for attention seekers.

Posted by: Lyn | June 23, 2008 10:45 AM

Coincidentally, there’s a new post by danah boyd at apophenia about the diffusion of troll-like behaviour outside the intertubes:

Continue reading ‘Trolling, not just for the intertubes any more’

David Burchell and the dark side

As the Murdoch press descends to ever greater heights of triviality in its campaign against the Rudd government’s “media management” (Oh noes! Not only won’t Kevin Rudd go on Insiders, he also “snubbed” a Japanese tv station - Japanese diplomats are angry!), humanities academic David Burchell from the University of Western Sydney, perhaps the last commentator from the not very lamented Whitlam Institute left standing, weighs in with an attack on the blogosphere. Gary Sauer-Thompson’s summary tells us all we need to know:

He says that we should leave the splenetically challenged Western bloggers to mud-wrestle among themselves, since their aspiration for freedom is just a pose or a lifestyle choice. Western bloggers would include Australian ones.

Note what is going on here. There is no attempt by Burchell to engage with any Australian political blogger. All are condemned and tossed into the waste bin without any argument. Burchell’s position is one in which the reasoned arguments of Australian political bloggers on public issues is characterised by pseudo-expertise and vituperation whilst the rants and raves of the News tabloid bloggers is marked by expertise and reason.

Burchell, in so reversing the actual state of affairs, has shown himself to be a Murdoch hack running the Australian’s party line against the independent media. Their credibility must be destroyed to save that of the journalists at News Ltd.

…like the journo at the centre of the incredible weekend anti-Rudd tirade, no doubt. Crikey has some interesting background on John Lyons.

Elsewhere: More from Tim Lambert, who detects some payback from David Burchell.

AP: That’ll be $2.50 a word for copy-paste, thanks

This guest post is from Lauredhel, crossposted from Hoyden About Town

The blogosphere is starting to buzz. What’s the buzz? AP has kicked up about bloggers posting short, linked excerpts without paying.

Out-law.com says that the Associated Press issued Rogers Cadenhead (of the Drudge Retort) a series of takedown notices under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). The stories contained excerpts from 33 to 79 words long of AP stories, with links to the original articles.

The Drudge Retort defends these excerpts as fair use.

Wired reports that the AP has been a little rocked by the blogosphere’s defiant response:

“We need to take a step back. It doesn’t mean we’re going to try to define a legal standard for fair use. All we’re saying, we’re going to figure out how the bloggers can use our content in a way we feel gives them a lot of leeway but still protects us,” Jim Kennedy, an AP vice-president, told Threat Level in an interview.

Kennedy added: “Do we really want to take this fight into the blogosphere? I think the answer to that question is, ‘no we don’t.’ Bloggers are different. That distinction was not being made. To that extent, this has been a helpful episode.”[1]

Continue reading ‘AP: That’ll be $2.50 a word for copy-paste, thanks’

Poll position

I’ve come to the firm conclusion that the “honeymoon is over” proclamation issued by the media en masse a few weeks ago with reference to the Rudd government and Kevin Rudd himself means nothing more than the media decided to report everything the government did with some spin about “symbolism over substance” and “lacking a narrative” - most recently exemplified in another complete waste of newsprint from Glenn Milne whose Sunday column this week lacks anything but rumour, gossip and speculation to support a series of fanciful contentions. Milne does include the most bizarre bit of all this verbiage - praise for the unlikely figure of Martin Ferguson as representing some sort of policy rigour, something we’ve had a bit to say about here at LP. In the wake of all this, we’ve got yet another poll today - on petrol and the Liberal leadership - which as Tim Dunlop points out at Blogocracy, is basically meaningless, but has enabled Emo Man Brendan Nelson to get some traction and air time to repeat his constant catchcry for a petrol excise cut.

Continue reading ‘Poll position’

LP virtual soapbox

On another thread, gandhi drew our attention to Possum’s idea about hosting posts people might like to submit from other blogs at his joint. On the principle that the intertubes encourage the theft imitation dissemination of good ideas (in a nice Creative Commons type way of course), we’ve been invited to consider doing the same thing. So we’re gonna have a go at it - maybe once a week for starters. Open to suggestions for a better feature thread title, and also open to suggestions as to how it should work. But, for starters, how about you post a link and a summary of any recent blog post you’ve written or read that you think might deserve highlighting. Comments could also be made, I guess, a la Troppo’s Missing Link, on the substance of the posts themselves. And any input as to whether this is a good idea and whether we should do it regularly, and how we could do it imaginatively are most welcome.

Please note that we’re also always open to guest posts. Please email us via this link if you’re interested.

Is Larvatus Prodeo Australia’s most influential political blog?

We’re a bit late to this party, for a number of reasons (no doubt including modesty, but more of that later). Trevor Cook reported last month on some research conducted by Dr Colin McLeod and presented to the MEAA’s Public Affairs Convention. The answer, according to McLeod, is yes. Over at gatewatching, Jason Wilson linked to Cook’s post with this commentary:

I seem to recall that last year that we copped a bit of stick for suggesting that Larvatus Prodeo was an influential blog. This was, of course, partly premised on Axel’s issuecrawler analysis of issue networks in the Australian blogosphere. The value of this analysis was disputed at the time, by other influential bloggers.

We’re certainly not universally popular in the blogosphere as this post indicates. But to forestall the anticipated flood of loud condemnations, it’s worth pausing to examine the nature of the claim being made in McLeod’s and Axel Bruns’ research, and what sort of “influence” they’re measuring, which I’ll do over the fold. I imagine that won’t actually forefend the loud condemnations, because there are a few folks out there who are obsessed with their big swinging hits. No names, no packdrill. They can out themselves by linking here.

I’ll also take the chance to update folks on our advertising performance and site stats for May, which was something of a bumper month for both.

Continue reading ‘Is Larvatus Prodeo Australia’s most influential political blog?’

The Netroots wars

There’s an interesting piece by Dana Goldstein in The New Republic on the fractures in the American “A-List” Democratic blogosphere around the primaries. I very rarely read Kos or MyDD, and this seems to me to express why:

The Netroots has always had a hostile streak, and it’s natural that as the Democratic Party and the Netroots themselves began to wield more power, some of that hostility would be directed inwards. Its denizens are also a relatively homogeneous bunch–largely male, middle-aged, college-educated, and upper middle class. The Democratic Party is a diverse coalition reliant on African Americans, single women, union members, and Latinos. Compound that demographic gap with the impersonality and frequent anonymity of the online world, and it seems inevitable that feelings would be hurt, and that some progressives would feel unwelcome in the clubhouse.

Inaugural Down Under Feminists’ Carnival

… has been posted at Hoyden.