Even if you’re not a local, you might have noticed that it’s been raining in Brisbane a lot recently. Anna Bligh’s taken advantage of fuller dams to execute a backflip on recycled water and to delay the Traveston Dam. These were two issues that the LNP had been making some running on lately, in the first instance aided and abetted by a quite disgraceful campaign about the supposed dangers of water recycling in the pages of, you guessed it, The Australian.
I think the first is bad policy - and it doesn’t give us much hope that Bligh is capable of either holding her nerve in the face of political shenanigans or of practising what she preaches about infrastructure and long term planning. It’s certainly not difficult to envisage the dam levels dropping back down in a few years time, and the whole point of this plan was to ensure continuity of water supply in such an eventuality. The work that has already been done has effectively been wasted.
Traveston is a different kettle of fish. In my view, it was always ill thought out and I’ve long thought it was mainly there to serve as a wedge between Brisbane voters and the Nationals before the 2006 election. I was surprised that Beattie ever went ahead with it after it had played its political purpose. In theory, the change to the scheduling of environmental mitigation measures is a good thing, but environmental concerns as well as its dubious contribution to water supply should actually have seen it canned rather than delayed.
Writing in Crikey today, Richard Farmer appears to think Bligh has executed a cunning political maneouvre. I can’t see it. Continue reading ‘Bligh’s big water backdown’
The Poll Bludger has the numbers on the latest Nielsen poll for Victoria. Labor leads on the 2PP 55-45.
The Age trumpets this result as Victorian Labor “defying the national trend”. No doubt other papers are saying the same - I haven’t looked.
I’ve been arguing for a while that there is insufficient evidence to conclude that there is a national trend against Labor, and that in fact thinking about disparate polls in seven different jurisdictions with differing political histories, cultures and current circumstances as constituting a trend makes little sense. My contention for a long time has been that elections are unrepeatable and singular events and that epistemologically we can know much less about electoral behaviour and find grounds for prediction with much less certainty than we think. Political behaviour follows few laws and a lot of conclusions reached after the fact are questionable.
But there is a sort of reflexivity feedback loop built into the way we think about politics and the way polls are reported. Particularly at state level - where polls are few and far between - one poll which struggles to form a series can have a large impact on perceptions, and thus the interpretations of the public and the press and the morale of politicians and “momentum”.
Continue reading ‘The truth of polls and the epistemology of politics’
This morning the Queensland Liberal-National Party’s latest television advertisement hit the airwaves, jostling for our attention with Amber Higlett’s early news show on Channel Nine. The ad can also be viewed here.
The ad features Laurence Springborg declaring his pride in presiding over the formation of “the LNP” as the first step towards “change in Queensland”. Said change will include things to do with schools, employment, housing and hospitals, and also making Queensland a place “where roads are planned for future growth”.
Two interesting things strike me about the advertisement.
Continue reading ‘Don’t mention the Nationals (or the Liberals, or the environment)’
Daylight saving has begun in some Southern states, but here in sunny Queensland, our political masters have decreed that we’re having none of it, despite government commissioned research which shows 60% in favour and 69% in the South East Corner.
When Anna Bligh became premier, she was quick to rule out daylight saving - a decision which was supposed to symbolise, well, decisiveness and a desire to govern for the cows and the blinds that might fade as well as for pesky urbanites.
It’s not looking like such a good call now. LNP members were instructed by the Borg’s office to avoid the subject when questioned, and flicking the switch to daylight saving would be a deft wedge to expose divisions between the Nats and the Libs in the LNP, as well as to highlight the lack of Brisbane representation on the LNP front bench.
As noted here and here in comments, there’s an extremely interesting development in Queensland state politics today - Indooroopilly MP Ronan Lee has defected from the ALP to join The Greens.
Lee has been something of a maverick during his time in Parliament, causing both Peter Beattie and Anna Bligh a few headaches, and having switched factional allegiance from one right wing faction - the Old Guard (”Labor Unity”) to the other - the AWU (”Labor Forum”). He might have expected ministerial promotion, particularly if Anna Bligh had had the determination and the support to put the broom through Cabinet that is needed - rather than just talking about “renewal” - but has had to content himself with the position of Parliamentary Secretary to the Attorney-General. Lee has been a very active local member, as his website demonstrates, and a position of some independence with regard to his party (Lee’s election paraphernalia and office signage have radically downplayed his ALP affiliation) must have assisted him in retaining a very marginal seat in traditional Western Suburbs leafy Liberal heartland he first won in 2001. Lee has also been outspoken on environmental and transport issues, and recently took a swipe at Anna Bligh for not being serious about green issues.
Lee’s defection is not necessarily unexpected, and as Dennis Atkins notes at Party Games, may not be unrelated to the difficulty of holding Indooroopilly if the LNP vote does improve in Brisbane. Continue reading ‘Indooroopilly Labor MP Ronan Lee joins Greens’
The other day I pointed to ludicrously misreported Galaxy polling showing federal Labor improving its vote in Queensland. Yesterday, the other bit of the Galaxy Poll was published in the Courier-Mail showing state Labor going backwards in Queensland. (Although actually, it only shows this if the comparison is with February - the last three polls show the 2PP bouncing around 52% for Labor and the margin of error isn’t stated. But as usual all the focus is on preferred Premier - where, of course, Anna Bligh is still ahead - but not by so much.)
Richard Farmer has pinged what the national News Limited polling pundits haven’t noticed - the movement in inconsistent directions (although the trend in both cases is weak) shows that their current narrative of “balancing” Labor’s federal dominance by turning on state Labor.
Incidentally, Lawrence Springborg shouldn’t get cocky (heh! bad pun!) about all the good news from the meejah. Continue reading ‘Left right hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing’
The Courier-Mail trumpets a Galaxy poll of Queenslanders on federal voting intentions:
Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull a hit in Queensland
If you look at the tables, Labor is in a (slightly) better position on the two party preferred than it was in the federal election, on 51-49 in the state (the ALP’s 2PP in Queensland in November was 50.4%). And the Coalition’s primary vote has fallen by .5%.
But:
The fact that Labor’s advantage in the home state of Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and Treasurer Wayne Swan could be eroded so quickly is likely to send shockwaves through the Federal Government.
Hardly.
All this is based on some improvement in the ratings on economic management (but with the Coalition still behind Labor). Last year, the Coalition had better poll numbers on economic management - and lost the election.
[Via Oz Politics]
I’m planning at some stage in the reasonably near future to write a longish post about Anna Bligh’s prospects (and I wouldn’t comment on Mike Rann’s, not being a resident of South Australia, and thus I don’t think able to assess them with any authority). But there’s a bit of an indicator of the trend from Newspoll which finds a dead heat in South Australia (50-50 down from 54-46 in the last quarterly poll) and only a slight advantage to Labor in Queensland (51-49 down from 55-45).
However, I don’t buy the whole “balancing state and federal governments” argument. States have political cycles of their own which are substantially independent of federal swings of the pendulum. In Queensland, changes of government are very rare, with only six since 1915. That might give you some idea of why Peter Beattie hung on in 2006 when by rights (and he knew it) he should have lost. And the LNP is still looking quite messy. Aside from the internal shenanigans associated with the Nats takeover, Lawrence Springborg has made a couple of big mistakes by not following up on his teaser campaign with any substantial policy in areas such as infrastructure, health and education and by going relatively silent since his great conservative union was kinda consummated. The Borg is now back in a no policy, carping oppo leader zone - with internal rumblings. So I think 2009 in Queensland is still Labor’s to lose.
Continue reading ‘Labor takes a hit in the polls in Queensland and South Australia’
Published in Activism,
Australiana,
Authoritarianism,
Books, Writers & Writing,
Brisbane,
Culture,
History,
Life,
Media,
Photography,
Queensland and
Urbanism .
Photo credit: me. A larger version of the image can be seen here by clicking on full view once inside the gallery.
The latest issue of Griffith REVIEW - Hidden Queensland - touches on a number of subjects close to my heart. In framing the issue, editor Julianne Schultz opens her introduction with a quote from a “well-connected insider” who expressed puzzlement in the lead up to the 2007 federal election - what did he know of Kevin Rudd and the rest of the crew from the North who might soon be moving into the Canberra corridors of power? Had they been from Melbourne, Sydney or “even Adelaide”, they’d have been on the radar. But what had been happening to transform a bastion of illiberality into the new centre of the “reforming Centre” in the two decades when he hadn’t been looking?
Continue reading ‘Hidden Queensland: Griffith REVIEW’
Denying former Liberal leader Bruce Flegg the shadow treasury spot as payback for his opposition to the amalgamation wasn’t a good start for Lawrence Springborg’s vision of the LNP as one happy Pineapple Party. Now it’s being revealed that some moderate Liberals are urging others to stay within the tent only for time being, while in some federal electorates in Brisbane - particularly Rankin - almost all members of the former Liberal Party have refused to join the LNP. If The Borg can’t convince his own ostensible troops in the capital of his bona fides, it suggests his chances of picking up the metropolitan seats he needs for victory rely only on his own charisma and pr efforts. Perhaps the rebranding of portfolios such as “food security” and “housing accessibility” demonstrates his (so far empty) vision for the future? And didn’t he mean “housing affordability”?
But it’s not all happy campers on the Labor side of the aisle either. Anna Bligh’s own left faction has chafed at her call to re-endorse Police Minister Judy Spence, whose seat of Mount Gravatt was abolished in the recent redistribution. The left’s Ros Mclennan, an independent teachers’ union official, has put her hand up for pre-selection.
From my point of view I’d be glad to see Spence go. She’s a “law and order” Minister of the most egregious kind, and as far as most people can tell, her agenda and the Police Union’s can’t be distinguished in any meaningful sense.
So Anna Bligh’s own faction has challenged her to make her rhetoric of renewal a reality, and to clear the frontbenches of non performers. The fact that this is being aired in public, and that it’s happening at all, is not a good sign. Continue reading ‘Liberals find Pineapple Party prickly, while Labor factions are on the move’
I note that Brian Costar has been thinking along similar lines to me and Andrew Bartlett on the subject of the formation of the Liberal National Party. He’s put his finger on the key challenge for the Borg and his crew, who haven’t had any amalgamation bounce if today’s Galaxy Poll is to be believed:
The new party is almost certainly to be more conservative than the pre-existing Liberal party – especially on social issues – and this might not prove attractive to the urban middle classes, who are certainly more numerous in Queensland than when Bjelke-Petersen mis-governed the state. Unless the party can harvest Brisbane seats from Labor it will not win government.
Continue reading ‘Queenslandism II’
Nelson gives hope and comfort to Mal Brough:
Dr Nelson - who supported a merger, but wanted voters to see a Liberal as president if the Nationals’ Lawrence Springborg was to be leader - yesterday defended Mr Brough. “I do believe Mal Brough has a future in politics if that is what he chooses to pursue,” Dr Nelson said.
Nice to see Brendan, in a spirit of solidarity, indicating that bumbling incompetence is no barrier to high office in the Liberal Party. But Mal’s problem is that he’s president of a party that doesn’t exist, but might still want a career in politics, but refuses to join the LNP. Continue reading ‘Brendan Nelson’s intervention’
Monash academics Nick Dyrenrfurth and Paul Strangio in retelling the story of the “fusion” of the non-Labor parties at the end of the first decade of federation make an explicit comparison with the formation of the Liberal National Party in Queensland a hundred years later.
The Deakinite Liberals of 1909 entered into fusion in a spirit of sorrow rather than enthusiasm. One declared: “I feel very strongly that we are about to make a mistake and yet, I am sorry to say, I see no possible way of preventing it.” The Age, self-appointed guardian of Liberal-Protectionist faith, was dismayed by coalescence: “Fusion is not a political blend in which liberalism and conservatism give and take, fusion is a sort of political boa constrictor (that) has swallowed liberalism whole.”
Writing in Crikey on Friday, Richard Farmer believed he had cut to the heart of the reasons why the foundation of the Pineapple Party has been accompanied by so many alarums and such bitterness:
Underlying the problem is clearly the impossibility of combining liberal thought, free market believers, Neanderthal agrarian socialism and intolerant social conservatives.
Incidentally, one might note that exactly the same problem has been evident in the post-Howardian Liberal Party, absent the dead hand of Howard himself and the glue of office.
In Queensland, of course, the political traditions and electoral and social geography of the state make both the free market strand and the social liberals very much minority constituencies, and there’s no doubt they will now be swamped by the social conservatives and the agrarian socialists within the LNP. This, of course, raises the question of whether ideology matters, a question posed by Andrew Bartlett in commentary on the contemporary Queensland fusion. Continue reading ‘Queenslandism’
The Liberal National Party process is in all sorts of trouble, with Queensland Liberal President Mal Brough obtaining a resolution from his State Council last night to delay the Liberal convention which was called to anoint the deal tomorrow. State Liberal leader Mark McCardle, along with two other of the party’s eight MPs, has cosied up with the Nats this morning, and threats of legal action and calls to proceed anyway with the convention are resounding through the airwaves.
As noted at LP in earlier posts, the turbulence in the incipient Pineapple Party comes from the spillover of the poisonous factional politics of the Queensland Libs. What’s happening now appears to be a split driven by the actions of the Santo Santoro forces, who are quite prepared to enter the new entity to try to exert the influence they’d been losing. Graham Young has a lot more detail on all the machinations - and motivations the media aren’t picking up - over at Ambit Gambit. It’s hard to disagree with his conclusion that Anna Bligh’s government is potentially beatable, but that the huge levels of disunity on display at the foundation of a “united conservative party” make the Libs and the Nats their own worst enemies.
Bernard Keane has a pretty good take on the latest machinations on the Pineapple Party, where The Borg has resolutely refused to allow any compromise on the presidency issue, leading some Liberals feeling (correctly) that the whole thing is just a Nationals takeover. He’s also right to highlight the influence of the Santo Santoro faction, who have now transferred their machinations to the Liberal National Party, since they were unable to achieve their aims in the Liberals. That’s very bad news potentially for the merged entity, because that mob are masters of the art of sacrificing electability for self-serving power grabs.
Where Keane’s article isn’t quite so astute is the claim that:
At this point, they may be relying on Nationals intransigence to wreck the deal.
Continue reading ‘Pineapple Party latest’
Recent comments
rosieblue, Lefty E, wankaroo, What me banal?, FDB, Eye'm A Love Man, Ooh Baby, Eye'm A Love Man [...]
Michael Sutcliffe, Mark, Tyro Rex, Adrien, Posey, Nabakov [...]
hannah's dad, Benedictus, Benedictus, Mary Jenkins, hannah's dad, JohnL [...]
Bingo Bango Boingo, Mark, Bingo Bango Boingo, wbb, Youie, CountArach
Lefty E, Tyro Rex, All Mi T
Lefty E, Nabakov, Lefty E, joe2, Mark, Fine [...]
wbb, via collins, via collins, Lefty E, GregM, Posey [...]
via collins, MikeM, glen, Deborah, zorronsky, Darlene [...]
RobWindt, Pappinbarra Fox, Ai! Que Dolor!, Patrick B, peter jones, Paul Burns [...]
Dave Bath, Bilko, Nabakov, Adrien, Richard Green, FDB [...]
Mark, Adrien, Adrien, Kim, Adrien, smiley [...]
Adrien, adrian, Audio Nerd, Pavlov's Cat, Katz, Lefty E [...]