Melburnians regularly talk about the old days of tram travel.
These were the days before a tram trip could result in having to give your name and address to a “customer relations officer” because you’re either a fare cheat or forgetful*.
While we’ve all had a great time mocking Brendan Nelson’s ridiculous promise of a petrol excise cut, it’s always good to be reminded about what the punters out there think. And, while any tiny movements in the voting intentions are essentially noise, they apparently seem to think that cutting petrol tax is a good idea:
Fifty-six per cent were critical of Mr Rudd’s performance on petrol, with 78% declaring the Government should act. Of those wanting something done, 67% said the Government should cut the fuel tax and only 22% preferred Labor’s controversial proposed price-monitoring FuelWatch scheme.
Dissatisfaction with Mr Rudd’s performance on petrol was highest in Victoria at 60% and lowest in NSW at 53%.
Tim at Blogocracy may well have argued that it’s meaningless, I don’t think it’s quite so meaningless as all that.
THE Federal Government has confirmed it will consider cutting the GST on fuel excise as part of a larger review of petrol taxation, as motoring bodies demanded an overhaul of the entire petrol-pricing system.
Treasurer Wayne Swan revealed at the weekend that he is considering scrapping the GST that applies to the petrol excise as part of a review of the tax system — a move that would save drivers about 3½ cents at the pump.
Taking tax off petrol is a dumb idea, one that Nelson got a well-deserved bollocking for, and one that Labor shouldn’t be thinking about. But this may have a silver lining, if we’re lucky.
If I tried really hard, I could probably think of some bad things about working from home. But today, it was all good. By about 3pm, I’d edited around 18000 words of PhD thesis to my satisfaction, and was on top of teaching and book review editing tasks, so having noticed when I wandered down to the shops earlier for some lunch it was an incredibly beautiful Brisbane autumn day, I decided to go for a gratuitous walk to the city - along the Riverwalk - about 2.2k. With a bit of discussion around the traps about Brisbane transport lately, it’s worth mentioning that Riverwalk, a network of walking and cycling tracks along the river stretching for about 20km, is one of the most visionary projects undertaken in our fine town in recent decades. An initiative of the Jim Soorley Labor Council in the late 90s, it was initially opposed by riverside property owners and the Liberals. But aside from giving New Farm residents the chance to walk or cycle to work, the floating pontoon section which stretches from Merthyr Road along to the Story Bridge and then joins up with the city stretch is just such a wonderful contribution to the city’s amenity. It’s usually jam packed with office workers around 5pm, and a little later on with strollers, joggers and cyclists, but if you can get the chance to do the walk on a week day outside peak hour, you have it almost all to yourself. I seized the chance, really enjoyed the walk, and snapped some photos.
There are more than I’m posting here, and you can see them all at this link. If you want to see a bigger version of any of them, remember to click on the “full view” link once you’re inside the gallery. If you haven’t done the walk, you might be interested by some of the unusual views of the iconic Story Bridge.
One of the big credibility problems The Borg has with his “new face of Queensland” nonsense is that at least on the National Party side of the Pineapple Party benches, he’s surrounded by a bunch of time serving geriatrics. The younger members - including Deputy Leader Fiona Simpson - have hardly made much of an electoral impact either. There’s a risk to running on “age” and “renewal” - Anna Bligh is no John Howard, and she’s not that much older than The Borg himself. Nor has she been in Parliament seemingly forever - “fresh” Lawrence is approaching the 20th anniversary of his election. Sam Clifford from Public Polity takes a look at another big fissure in Lawrence Springborg’s narrative - the fact that the ALP has been renewing itself with some genuine talent.
It looks like some of the Class of ‘89, those ALP MPs who entered politics when the ALP finally defeated the Nationals, are going to step aside for the next election. MPs like Rod Welford, the Education Minister, will be sorely missed but there needs to be renewal in government to maintain strength and contact with the world outside. There are a number of promising young Labor politicians like Ronan Lee, Andrew McNamara, Grace Grace, Stirling Hinchliffe and Andrew Fraser who will form the next generation of Labor’s front bench and will shape the future of the state (much to the ‘Borg’s chagrin).
One common trope amongst people interested in energy efficiency is that the modern car is a terribly inefficient device, using 1500 kilograms of metal to move roughly 75 kilograms of human. It sounds like such a waste, doesn’t it? Surely we can make lighter-bodied cars with modern technology, right? The lighter bodies would require smaller, lighter, engines to push them around. Lighter brakes, lighter suspension…and a positive feedback loop would leave us cars that we can pick up and carry into a parking space if necessary. That’s the key idea of the Hypercar concept that’s been pushed by Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute for many a year now.
However, actual Hypercars, or anything approximating them, have been rather scarce on the ground. There’s good reason for that. For one thing, the whole concept is predicated on the use of lightweight composite materials - the carbon fibre that’s proliferating in high-end tennis racquets, bicycles and the like. But as anybody who’s bought such composite-laden gadgets knows, they’re really, really expensive. But we may see some actual running, production-viable prototypes over the next few years.
Flicking through the Fin Review at lunch today, there was all manner of interesting tidbits about the budget. For instance, the means testing of the baby bonus will scrape back a lot less revenue than the scrapping of an obscure tax exemption on the byproducts from natural gas production - a form of light crude oil called condensate. And disappointingly, the FBT concession for company cars stayed, so we’ll continue to have the spectacle of people driving around in circles, burning fuel and releasing CO2, just to collect a tax rebate.
But there’s one little program that was rumoured to get the axe, but didn’t - the LPG vehicle scheme. This scheme provides a rebate of $2000 to get your car converted to run on LPG, and $1000 if you buy a pre-converted vehicle from a manufacturer. Even without the rebate, if you drive a reasonable-sized car around the average distance, it pays for itself in a couple of years. With the rebate, it seems to be a complete no-brainer - it pays for the remaining cost of the conversion within a year, and saves around $1000 per year, every year after that.
Which brings me to a simple question, which relates to adapting to higher energy prices. If LPG is such a no-brainer - particularly after the government bribe - why isn’t everybody installing it?
In my case, the answer’s simple - I commute on a motor scooter, which not only saves me fuel but even more on parking, and Rex is a high-powered indulgence which gets driven relatively little. But, LP readers, why aren’t you? Do you all drive very little? Worried about the effect on the reliability and resale value of the car? Think that the lower fuel economy will take away all the advantage of the cheaper fuel (from all reports, it does use substantially more fuel, but the costs aren’t that bad). Don’t want to lose any engine power? Or is it simply not worth the hassle of doing the conversion for you?
While everyone’s heard the jokes about the USA being the land of the monster truck, it’s not until you actually go there and wander round a shopping mall carpark that you appreciate just how gargantuan the average American family vehicle is. The typical American car isn’t a car at all, it’s a Ford F-150 SuperCrew, a 2500 kg behemoth. They’re terrible to drive, by all reports, and get about 13mpg - or, if you like, use 18 litres for every 100 kilometres driven. But, since 2001, sales of “light-duty trucks” of this ilk have exceeded total sales of passenger cars in the United States, helped not only by cheap fuel but a collection of tax write-offs that encouraged their purchase. Continue reading ‘Energy roundup - cars vs trucks, better biofuel’
Planning academic Paul Mees has been a tireless advocate for Melbourne’s public transport system for a long time. And, while his views on various topics are often disputed by other experts, they’re always worth a read. Ditto his latest research, which makes the observation that the average fuel economy of the Australian vehicle fleet has essentially stayed the same for 45 years:
In research for the Garnaut Climate Change Review, Melbourne University’s Dr Paul Mees has used Australian Bureau of Statistics figures to show that fuel efficiency has remained practically unchanged since 1963.
In that year — the first date efficiency was recorded by the Federal Government — the average Australian car used 11.4 litres of petrol to travel 100 kilometres.
In 2006, according to the ABS’s Survey of Motor Vehicle Use, it remained identical.
As a follow-up to my post on Melbourne’s transport issues, the Eddington Report has now been released.
As speculated on earlier, there will indeed be a road tunnel, but one with no CBD exits. Furthermore, there’s a massive rail tunnel project as well, linking Footscray in the west to Caulfield in the south-east, providing an alternative to the overcrowded City Loop in the CBD. There’s also a rail link joining Sunshine and Werribee. Total cost - in the order of $18 billion. Oh, and Eddington describes congestion charging for Melbourne as inevitable.
As my friend and urban planner Russ notes, there’s something in there to annoy just about everyone. For instance, Eddington’s view is that land use change, and public transport, is unlikely to make much of a dint in CO2 emissions from vehicles. Anyway, there’s a hell of a lot to chew on in here, both for Melbourne residents like myself and those interested in urban planning issues more generally.
Fisher and Paykel have just announced hundreds of job cuts at their plant in Brisbane. Victa mowers are still made in Australia, but, increasingly, they’re powered by less environmentally destructive four-stroke engines built overseas. The last distinctively Australian personal computer was probably the MicroBee. I believe that the last televisions produced in Australia came out of the Sanyo factory in Wodonga in the late 80s or early 1990s. And Australia has never mass-produced jet airliners, bulk oil tankers, or watches. And, in general, this hasn’t seemed to bother governments or the broader public too much. But the conniptions of the Australian automotive industry have always been a special case.
Well, Mark might not be picking apart the 2020 list, as it’s too obvious, I’m an obvious kind of person…A few hours Googling later, and we have a horribly superficial, uninformed commentary on the 100 (well, 86 actually) listed delegates to the sustainability sub-summit.
Discussion and the annotated, commentated list over the fold.
I was having a chat last night with a friend and colleague about the theme of media decline. He’s a bit sceptical. I’m a tad sceptical about it as well, possibly for different reasons, and I won’t elaborate because I suspect that his ideas will turn up in a post sooner or later, but one thing I think we agreed on was that coverage of Australian politics in the print media is changing - and not for the better - for a number of reasons and in a number of ways. One case in point is the fact that the local media in Brisbane basically didn’t bother to cover our local elections in any depth, and only began covering them at all when the campaign was already well under way.
I’m not sure what the reason was - the fact that the result was regarded as a forgone conclusion may have been one. As it turned out, not only were they missing out on the chance to engage in some “public journalism” and analyse in depth issues that all the opinion research tells us are of great public concern - for instance the transport tangle - but they also missed what in any media terms would be defined as a real story - the swing against Labor in the wards.
The inner north of Melbourne is not a bad place to be a pedestrian or cyclist. There’s any number of shopping and restaurant strips festooned with bicycle hoops, most gradually gentrifying but retaining that slight streak of rebelliousness that distinguishes them from the blue-rinse heartland off to the south-east. Lots of people ride to work along the widely distributed cycle lanes, with artfully placed barriers allowing cycle commuters, but not cars, down wide, flat boulevards like North Carlton’s Canning Street. And there’s a couple of train lines, a profusion of trams, and even a gradually improving bus schedule to get oneself around.
But in amongst this car-haters idyll, there’s one dramatic exception - Alexandra Parade. Despite its pretentious name, it’s a massive traffic sewer that links what used to be the Tullamarine Freeway from the airport, to the Eastern Freeway to the outer-eastern wastelands of Ringwood. And, every weekday morning and evening, the eight lanes of this ugly piece of road are jammed to capacity with cars and trucks; the only people making any progress through it tend to be lane-splitting nutcases on bikes and scooters. Despite the desultory attempts at bicycle lanes, no sane cyclist would go near the smelly particulate-laden air that diffuses from the thousands of commuters, truckies, and courier vans. My own daily commute takes me, briefly, onto the Parade; and while my travelling time hasn’t changed much, the proportion of that time spent weaving through stationary cars and trucks has increased markedly. And, at peak times, the queue of vehicles backed up on the Eastern Freeway trying to enter the inner city can be kilometers long. On occasion, I also take the train to work, from Brunswick into the city, and then out to Hawthorn. As an academic, it doesn’t matter terribly much if I’m in after the 9 o’clock rush, so in the past this usually meant an uncrowded carriage in which I could find out what nonsense Tracee Hutchinson was inflicting on the opinion pages that day. But the squeeze is increasingly on in Melbourne’s rail carriages too; even lunchtime trains into the city are becoming standing room only.
Before getting too up in arms about former National Party leader Mark Vaile moonlighting as a lobbyist - while staying on the public payroll as an MP - let’s look on the bright side and note that he can’t continue to pervert good environmental policy. While in government, the National Party remained the biggest single barrier to fixing the Murray-Darling river system, with their absolute refusal to countenance the idea that governments would have to buy back water allocations.
And now, quietly, without fuss, it’s beginning to happen, as Professor Quiggin discusses approvingly at length:
Three months after the change of government, the seemingly immovable barriers to action have disappeared. The Minister for Water, Penny Wong, has announced a tender to buy water rights back from irrigators willing to sell, allocating $50 million for the current financial year.
Larvatus Prodeo is an Australian group blog which discusses politics, sociology, culture, life, religion and science from a left of centre perspective. more»
Recent comments
Eye, Mark, Eye, Mark, Klaus K, laura [...]
Frank Calabrese, Frank Calabrese, CK, Frank Calabrese, Benedictus, Frank Calabrese [...]
Jacques Chester, Mark, Bingo Bango Boingo, Down and Out of Sài Gòn, Mark, Bingo Bango Boingo
Mark, Leigh, laura, Frank Calabrese, Mark, Mark [...]
Leigh, j_p_z, Nick, joe2, Katz, Mark [...]
Eye, Elizabeth Hart, sandstone, Spiros, Luke, wilful [...]
Mark, Mark Elliott, Mark, Joy, Fine, Ambigulous [...]
Mark, laura, Mark, GM, Mark, Phil [...]
Mark, Jack Strocchi, Jack Strocchi, FDB, Jack Strocchi, steve [...]
Boy from Flynn, Gareth Walton, Brian, Brian, maria macdonald, Hayley [...]
Howard C, Muskiemp, Don Wigan, Alan, professor rat, Howard C [...]
ThirdCat, Phil, Bismarck, Tony, Craig Johnstone, Ramon [...]